Dimensions of Learner Control A Reappraisal for Interactive Multimedia Instruction

The potential benefits of technology for education have frequently been technology driven,. No more so than with the current developments in multimedia which integrated text, graphics, video and audio to provide a comprehensive representation of a content domain on a single display monitor. In this environment, developers are producing applications which reflect significant changes in the way in which information is presented, delivered and accessed. Consequently, new and different problems are emerging in the way in which learners develop an understanding or mental model of both the content and structure of the instructional software being used. With the challenge to facilitate the rapid formation of accurate mental models, this paper reviews the paradigm shifts which have occurred in the critical areas of instructional strategy, learning theory, interaction and interface design and introduces a reappraisal of learner control research in terms of a set of dimensions required for effective multimedia instruction. A new approach to design at both the interface and instructional level is required to take full advantage of both the technology and learner requirements.

[1]  Michael D. Williams,et al.  A Comprehensive Review of Learner-Control: The Role of Learner Characteristics. , 1993 .

[2]  John C. Belland,et al.  Is the self-paced instructional program, via microcomputer-based instruction, the most effective method of addressing individual learning differences? , 1985 .

[3]  M. David Merrill,et al.  The new Component Design Theory: instructional design for courseware authoring , 1987 .

[4]  Diane P. Janes.  A review of Computer-Based Instruction: Methods and Development (2nd Edition) , 1991 .

[5]  W. Milheim,et al.  Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: Three different perspectives. , 1991 .

[6]  Training problem-solving skills part 2: Design guidelines based on cognitive psychology , 1992 .

[7]  M. David Merrill,et al.  Instructional Design Theory , 1971 .

[8]  William D. Milheim,et al.  The Effects of Pacing and Sequence Control in an Interactive Video Lesson. , 1990 .

[9]  Roy B. Clariana,et al.  The Motivational Effect of Advisement on Attendance and Achievement in Computer-Based Instruction. , 1993 .

[10]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[11]  Philippe C. Duchastel.  Display and interaction features of instructional texts and computers , 1988 .

[12]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Pseudoscience in Computer-Based Instruction: The Case of Learner Control Research. , 1993 .

[13]  Susan H. Gray,et al.  The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning , 1987 .

[14]  Richard A. Schwier,et al.  Interactive Multimedia Instruction , 1993 .

[15]  Marilyn P. Arnone,et al.  Curiosity as a personality variable influencing learning in a learner controlled lesson with and without advisement , 1994 .

[16]  Richard A. Schwier.  A Taxonomy of Interaction for Instructional Multimedia. , 1992 .

[17]  Susan H. Gray.  Sequence control menus and CAI: a follow-up study , 1988 .

[18]  Samuel Hicken,et al.  Learner control modes and incentive variations in computer-delivered instruction , 1992 .

[19]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Mental models: A research focus for interactive learning systems , 1992 .