Study on Reactive Power Compensation Strategies for Long Distance Submarine Cables Considering Electrothermal Coordination

Long-distance high voltage alternating current (AC) submarine cables are widely used to connect offshore wind farms and land power grids. However, the transmission capacity of the submarine cable is limited by the capacitive charging current. This paper analyzes the impacts of reactive power compensation in different positions on the current distribution on long-distance submarine cable transmission lines, and tests the rationality of the existing reactive power compensation schemes based on electrothermal coordination (ETC). Research shows that compensation at the sending end has obvious impacts on current distribution along the cable, and the maximum current occurs at the sending or receiving end. Moreover, the reactive power compensation at sending end will reduce the current at receiving end of the line. On the contrary, it will increase the current at sending end. Compared with the directly buried laying method of the submarine cable in the landing section, the cable trench laying method can increase the cable ampacity of the landing section and reduce the reactive power compensation capacity at the sending end. The ampacity is the current representation of the thermal limits of the cable. ETC exploits the cable ampacity to coordinate current distribution on transmission lines under existing reactive power compensation schemes, thus optimizing the reactive power compensation schemes and avoiding the bottleneck point of cable ampacity.

[1]  Prasanth Thummala,et al.  Subsea power transmission cable modelling: Reactive power compensation and transient response studies , 2016, 2016 IEEE 17th Workshop on Control and Modeling for Power Electronics (COMPEL).

[2]  Grain Philip Adam,et al.  HVDC Transmission: Technology Review, Market Trends and Future Outlook , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[3]  Ola Carlson,et al.  Factors Influencing Design of Dynamic Reactive Power Compensation for an Offshore Wind Farm , 2009 .

[4]  Jiasheng Huang,et al.  Investigation on Cable Rejuvenation by Simulating Cable Operation , 2020, IEEE Access.

[5]  Zhu Guiping,et al.  Optimisation of reactive power compensation of HVAC cable in off-shore wind power plant , 2015 .

[6]  Satish Gunturi,et al.  Power transfer capability of HVAC cables for subsea transmission and distribution systems , 2013 .

[7]  Joachim Holboell,et al.  Electrothermal Coordination in Cable Based Transmission Grids , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Marco Marelli,et al.  Core laying pitch-long 3D finite element model of an AC three-core armoured submarine cable with a length of 3 metres , 2017 .

[9]  F.D. Galiana,et al.  Electrothermal coordination part I: theory and implementation schemes , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Hui Ma,et al.  Thermal rating of offshore wind farm cables installed in ventilated J-tubes , 2018 .

[11]  Salvy Bourguet,et al.  Modeling of a wave farm export cable for electro-thermal sizing studies , 2020 .

[12]  Ronan Meere,et al.  Low Frequency AC transmission as an alternative to VSC-HVDC for grid interconnection of offshore wind , 2015, 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech.

[13]  Emanuel P. P. Soares-Ramos,et al.  Current status and future trends of offshore wind power in Europe , 2020 .

[14]  Alberto Geri,et al.  Steady-state operating conditions of very long EHVAC cable lines: Two case studies , 2012 .

[15]  M. Trovato,et al.  Control strategy for regulating reactive power exchange in offshore wind farm , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[16]  Justin K. Dix,et al.  Effect of Sediment Properties on the Thermal Performance of Submarine HV Cables , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[17]  Roberto Benato,et al.  Operating capability of long AC EHV transmission cables , 2005 .

[18]  Alberto Geri,et al.  Steady-state operating conditions of very long EHVAC cable lines , 2011 .

[19]  Bjørn Gustavsen,et al.  Variable Transmission Voltage for Loss Minimization in Long Offshore Wind Farm AC Export Cables , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[20]  C. S. Schifreen,et al.  Charging Current Limitations in Operation or High-Voltage Cable Lines [includes discussion] , 1956, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers Part III Power Apparatus and Systems.

[21]  M. Savaghebi,et al.  Dynamic Rating of Three-Core XLPE Submarine Cables for Offshore Wind Farms , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[22]  J. R. Carson Wave propagation in overhead wires with ground return , 1926 .

[23]  K. F. Goddard,et al.  Analytical Thermal Rating Method for Cables Installed in J-Tubes , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[24]  Gang Liu,et al.  Dynamic Thermal Analysis of High-Voltage Power Cable Insulation for Cable Dynamic Thermal Rating , 2019, IEEE Access.