Justification and Interlaced Knowledge at ATLAS, CERN

We report on a longitudinal study of the emergence of the ATLAS detector, a complex technological system developed at CERN, Geneva. Our data show that the coordination of initial architectural choices was driven by cycles of contestation and justification that resulted in the creation of what we term interlaced knowledge-pockets of shared knowledge interwoven within and across subsystem communities at ATLAS. We also found that these justifications were possible because of the presence of a boundary infrastructure that served as a common substrate of knowledge for all ATLAS participants. Together, the boundary infrastructure and interlaced knowledge enabled participants to make co-oriented technological choices, address latent interdependencies, and minimize the incidence and severity of glitches when integrating the various subsystems.

[1]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[2]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Coordination Through Committees and Markets , 1987 .

[3]  Øystein D. Fjeldstad,et al.  The architecture of collaboration , 2012 .

[4]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  10 Coordination in Organizations: An Integrative Perspective , 2009 .

[5]  R. Garud,et al.  From transaction to transformation costs: The case of Polaroid's SX-70 camera , 2008 .

[6]  Thorbjørn Knudsen,et al.  Organization Design: The Epistemic Interdependence Perspective , 2010 .

[7]  Raghu Garud,et al.  A Socio-Cognitive Model of Technology Evolution: The Case of Cochlear Implants , 2015 .

[8]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[9]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Perspective - Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[10]  R. Garud,et al.  Using the Brain as a Metaphor to Model Flexible Production Systems , 1994 .

[11]  Thomas Clarke,et al.  The Governance of Globalization , 2006 .

[12]  Steven Postrel,et al.  Shared knowledge, “glitches,” and product development performance , 1999 .

[13]  Charles Heckscher,et al.  Professional Work: The Emergence of Collaborative Community , 2009 .

[14]  Michael McGill,et al.  Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval , 1983 .

[15]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[16]  S. Stapnes.  Detector challenges at the LHC , 2007, Nature.

[17]  B. Latour.  Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern , 2004, Critical Inquiry.

[18]  Phanish Puranam,et al.  Integrating Acquired Capabilities: When Structural Integration is (Un)Necessary , 2005 .

[19]  Beth A. Bechky.  Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[20]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Quantifying social group evolution , 2007, Nature.

[21]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[22]  M. Tushman,et al.  On the Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Towards a Sociology of Technological Evolution , 1992 .

[23]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[24]  Timothy S. Simcoe.  Standard Setting Committees: Consensus Governance for Shared Technology Platforms , 2010 .

[25]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[26]  Steven Postrel,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Islands of Shared Knowledge: Specialization and Mutual Understanding in Problem-Solving Teams , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Thinking along: a process for tapping into knowledge across boundaries , 2011, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[28]  Johann Peter Murmann,et al.  Dominant Designs, Technological Cycles and Organizational Outcomes , 2002 .

[29]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[30]  Martin F. Porter,et al.  An algorithm for suffix stripping , 1997, Program.

[31]  Philipp Genschel.  How Fragmentation Can Improve Co-ordination: Setting Standards in International Telecommunications , 1997 .

[32]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[33]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Interfirm Modularity and Its Implications for Product Development , 2005 .

[34]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[35]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  The Coevolution of Community Networks and Technology: Lessons from the Flight Simulation Industry , 1998 .

[36]  Z. Zhao,et al.  Beyond boundary spanners: The ‘collective bridge’ as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge , 2013 .

[37]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the dynamics of science and technology : sociology of science in the real world , 1988 .

[38]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[39]  B. Kogut,et al.  Open-source Software Development and Distributed Innovation , 2001 .

[40]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[41]  Karin D. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  How Superorganisms Change: Consensus Formation and the Social Ontology of High-Energy Physics Experiments , 1995 .

[42]  W. Starbuck.  Organizations as Action Generators , 1983 .

[43]  M. Hobday.  Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation , 1998 .

[44]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[45]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[46]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[47]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[48]  A. V. D. Ven.  SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDYING STRATEGY PROCESS: A RESEARCH NOTE , 1992 .

[49]  R. Gulati,et al.  The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[50]  A. Pickering.  The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[52]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  An introduction to latent semantic analysis , 1998 .

[53]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[54]  Suresh Kotha,et al.  Managing a Global Partnership Model: Lessons from the Boeing 787 'Dreamliner' Program , 2012 .

[55]  John Stone,et al.  Handbook of Science and Technology Studies , 2007 .

[56]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[57]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[58]  Charles Heckscher,et al.  Perspective - Professional Work: The Emergence of Collaborative Community , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[59]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and Exceptions , 2016 .

[60]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[61]  J. Mitchell,et al.  The Concept and Use of Social Networks , 1969 .

[62]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[63]  Yue Maggie Zhou,et al.  Designing for Complexity: Using Divisions and Hierarchy to Manage Complex Tasks , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[64]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[65]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[66]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[67]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community , 2007 .

[68]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[69]  Elaine K. Yakura,et al.  Charting Time: Timelines as Temporal Boundary Objects , 2002 .

[70]  J. Cook,et al.  Climate Change Denial , 2011 .

[71]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[72]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[73]  Varghese P. George,et al.  From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance Formation , 2001 .

[74]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Coordination, Organizational Boundaries and Fads in Business Practices , 1996 .

[75]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[76]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[77]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1 , 1999 .

[78]  M. Callon.  Four Models for the Dynamics of Science , 1995 .

[79]  R. Garud,et al.  Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[80]  H. M. Collins,et al.  The Third Wave of Science Studies , 2002, Science, Technology, and Society.

[81]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[82]  Christopher Alexander.  Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[83]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[84]  W. Trochim.  Outcome pattern matching and program theory , 1989 .

[85]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[86]  Thomas A. Schwandt,et al.  Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation , 2007 .

[87]  John Cook,et al.  Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand , 2011 .

[88]  P. Puranam,et al.  Integrating Distributed Work: Comparing Task Design, Communication and Tacit Coordination Mechanisms , 2008 .

[89]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[90]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[91]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[92]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[93]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  A Theory of Collective Induction , 1995 .

[94]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[95]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology , 1986 .

[96]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. , 1986 .

[97]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. , 2001 .

[98]  S. E. Green,et al.  A Rhetorical Theory of Diffusion , 2004 .

[99]  Claus Rerup,et al.  Going Mobile: Aesthetic Design Considerations from Calder and the Constructivists , 2006 .

[100]  Sanjay Jain,et al.  Incomplete by Design and Designing for Incompleteness , 2008 .

[101]  K. Weick,et al.  Unobtrusive Measures in Organizational Theory: A Reminder. , 1979 .

[102]  K. Lakhani,et al.  The Principles of Distributed Innovation , 2007, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[103]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution * , 2003 .

[104]  T. Landauer,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990 .

[105]  R. Garud,et al.  Perspectives on Innovation Processes , 2013 .