Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics.

The practice of digital radiographic imaging is poised to undergo dramatic change in the very near future owing to a rapid proliferation of electronically readable x-ray detectors. Although self-scanning, direct-readout digital detectors have been in use since the introduction of the charged-coupled device (CCD) almost 30 years ago, recent advances in manufacturing technology have made possible a new generation of large-area, flat-panel detectors with integrated, thin-film transistor readout mechanisms. The excitement surrounding this new technology is based on two factors—the promise of very rapid access to digital images wherever radiography with stationary x-ray equipment is performed and the anticipation of image quality that exceeds that of both screen-film receptors and photostimulable storage phosphor computed radiographic systems because of improvements in x-ray detector technology. As digital radiography continues this rapid evolution, it is likely that radiologists will be inundated with information concerning a wide variety of large-area, flat-panel electronic detectors. Unfortunately, it is also likely that there will be a tendency to think of these devices as equivalent, interchangeable commodities because they will be similar in physical size, appearance, and targeted applications. It must be emphasized, however, that important differences exist among these detectors, and differences in digital image quality among the various systems are inevitable and may be quite large. To minimize confusion, therefore, it is important that radiologists have a working understanding of this emerging technology. In this report, we provide an overview of digital electronic x-ray detectors, including two broad classes of detectors based on thin-film transistor arrays and the older, CCD-based designs. Computed radiographic systems based on photostimulable storage phosphors are omitted from this report because they do not contain integrated readout mechanisms (1). Our goal is to provide a brief review of the basic methods, designs, and materials used in direct-readout radiographic systems and to emphasize important characteristics that may affect system performance and image quality. The advantages and disadvantages of the different detectors, as well as the important factors that should be considered when performing a critical analysis of these new digital imaging systems, are discussed.

[1]  U Neitzel,et al.  Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector. , 1994, Medical physics.

[2]  Cornelis H. Slump,et al.  Real-time diagnostic imaging with a novel x-ray detector with multiple screen-CCD sensors , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[3]  Paulus Dd Xeroradiography--an in-depth review. , 1980 .

[4]  S. Kasap,et al.  X-ray induced hole trapping in electroradiographic plates , 1991 .

[5]  I. Blevis,et al.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: construction and evaluation of a prototype real-time detector. , 1997, Medical physics.

[6]  J. W. Boag,et al.  REVIEW ARTICLE: Xeroradiography , 1973 .

[7]  Manabu Tanaka,et al.  Development of a selenium-based flat-panel detector for real-time radiography and fluoroscopy , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[8]  J T Dobbins,et al.  Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems. , 1995, Medical physics.

[9]  Phillip C. Bunch Performance characteristics of asymmetric zero-crossover screen-film systems , 1992, Medical Imaging.

[10]  C. Floyd,et al.  Memory artifact related to selenium-based digital radiography systems. , 1997, Radiology.

[11]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography. , 1997, Radiology.

[12]  D. Paulus Xeroradiography--an in-depth review. , 1980, CRC critical reviews in diagnostic imaging.

[13]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging with amorphous selenium: detective quantum efficiency of photoconductive receptors for digital mammography. , 1995, Medical physics.

[14]  H. Blume,et al.  DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices. , 1995, Medical physics.

[15]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency. , 1997, Medical physics.

[16]  C E Ravin,et al.  Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Peking Xeroradiography , 2020, Definitions.

[18]  Thierry Ducourant,et al.  Amorphous silicon x-ray image sensor , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[19]  M. Sonoda,et al.  Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. , 1983, Radiology.

[20]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: inherent spatial resolution. , 1995, Medical physics.

[21]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Flat panel detector for digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[22]  J Yorkston,et al.  Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology. , 1997, Medical physics.

[23]  P J Papin,et al.  A prototype amorphous selenium imaging plate system for digital radiography. , 1987, Medical physics.