An optimal number of molecules for signal amplification and discrimination in a chemical cascade.

Understanding the information processing ability of signal transduction pathways is of great importance because of their crucial roles in triggering various cellular responses. Despite continuing theoretical investigation, some important aspects of signal transduction such as a transient response and its connection to stochasticity originating from a small number of molecules have not yet been well understood. It is, however, through these aspects that unexpected and nontrivial properties of the information processing emerge. In this article, we analyze the transient behavior of a simple signaling cascade by taking into account the stochasticity originating from the small number of molecules. We identify several properties of the signaling cascade that emerge as a result of the interplay between the stochasticity and transient dynamics of the cascade. We specifically demonstrate that each step of the cascade has an optimal number of signaling molecules at which the average signal amplitude becomes maximal. We further investigate the connection between a finite number of molecules and the ability of the cascade to discriminate between true and error signals, which cannot be inferred from deterministic descriptions. The implications of our results are discussed from both biological and mathematical viewpoints.

[1]  D. Siegmund,et al.  Stochastic model of protein-protein interaction: why signaling proteins need to be colocalized. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  P. Swain,et al.  The role of proofreading in signal transduction specificity. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[4]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  W. S. Hlavacek,et al.  Mathematical and computational models of immune-receptor signalling , 2004, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[6]  R. Davis,et al.  Structural organization of MAP-kinase signaling modules by scaffold proteins in yeast and mammals. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[7]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Prediction and measurement of an autoregulatory genetic module , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Andrew D McCulloch,et al.  Mechanistic systems models of cell signaling networks: a case study of myocyte adrenergic regulation. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[9]  J. Massagué,et al.  How cells read TGF-β signals , 2000, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[10]  Peipei Ping,et al.  Scaffold proteins and assembly of multiprotein signaling complexes. , 2004, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[11]  Kevin Burrage,et al.  Stochastic approaches for modelling in vivo reactions , 2004, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[12]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Evaluation of the performance of mechanisms for noise attenuation in a single-gene expression. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[14]  Alexander Scheeline,et al.  HOW CELLS AVOID ERRORS IN METABOLIC AND SIGNALING NETWORKS , 2003 .

[15]  B. Séraphin,et al.  Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[16]  J. Ferrell Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[17]  D. Gillespie A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[18]  B. Müller-Hill The lac Operon: A Short History of a Genetic Paradigm , 1996 .

[19]  R. Iyengar,et al.  Modeling cell signaling networks. , 2004, Biology of the cell.

[20]  K. Fujimoto,et al.  Noisy signal amplification in ultrasensitive signal transduction. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Fluctuations and quality of control in biological cells: zero-order ultrasensitivity reinvestigated. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[22]  U. Bhalla Signaling in small subcellular volumes. II. Stochastic and diffusion effects on synaptic network properties. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[23]  William S. Hlavacek,et al.  Modeling the early signaling events mediated by FcepsilonRI. , 2002, Molecular immunology.

[24]  C. Rao,et al.  Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise , 2002, Nature.

[25]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Optimal phosphorylation step number of intracellular signal-transduction pathway. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  Jehoshua Bruck,et al.  Scaffold proteins may biphasically affect the levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and reduce its threshold properties. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  G. Shivashankar,et al.  Tracking operator state fluctuations in gene expression in single cells. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Noise-reduction through interaction in gene expression and biochemical reaction processes. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[30]  John D. Scott,et al.  Signaling Complexes: Junctions on the Intracellular Information Super Highway , 2002, Current Biology.

[31]  H. Qian Amplifying signal transduction specificity without multiple phosphorylation. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Jesper Tegnér,et al.  Systems biology is taking off. , 2003, Genome research.

[33]  T. Ideker,et al.  A new approach to decoding life: systems biology. , 2001, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[34]  Mark Goulian,et al.  Robust control in bacterial regulatory circuits. , 2004, Current opinion in microbiology.

[35]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic amplification and signaling in enzymatic futile cycles through noise-induced bistability with oscillations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  K. Yoshioka,et al.  Scaffold proteins in mammalian MAP kinase cascades. , 2004, Journal of biochemistry.

[37]  J. Raser,et al.  Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[38]  Anirvan M. Sengupta,et al.  Engineering aspects of enzymatic signal transduction: photoreceptors in the retina. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[39]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Optimal Length and Signal Amplification in Weakly Activated Signal Transduction Cascades , 2003, math/0311357.

[40]  J. Ross,et al.  Signal Processing by Simple Chemical Systems , 2002 .

[41]  Masaru Tomita,et al.  Space in systems biology of signaling pathways – towards intracellular molecular crowding in silico , 2005, FEBS letters.

[42]  S. Leibler,et al.  Biological rhythms: Circadian clocks limited by noise , 2000, Nature.

[43]  R. Weiss,et al.  Ultrasensitivity and noise propagation in a synthetic transcriptional cascade. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  J. Paulsson Summing up the noise in gene networks , 2004, Nature.

[45]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Random signal fluctuations can reduce random fluctuations in regulated components of chemical regulatory networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[46]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[47]  S. Leibler,et al.  DNA looping and physical constraints on transcription regulation. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  H. Kitano Systems Biology: A Brief Overview , 2002, Science.

[49]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Multivariate analysis of noise in genetic regulatory networks. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[50]  Muffy Calder,et al.  When kinases meet mathematics: the systems biology of MAPK signalling , 2005, FEBS letters.

[51]  L. Serrano,et al.  Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation , 2000, Nature.

[52]  Hong Qian,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity amplification in signal transduction , 2003, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[53]  A. Arkin,et al.  It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[54]  M. Thattai,et al.  Attenuation of noise in ultrasensitive signaling cascades. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[55]  D. Koshland,et al.  Ultrasensitivity in biochemical systems controlled by covalent modification. Interplay between zero-order and multistep effects. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[56]  H. Wiley,et al.  An integrated model of epidermal growth factor receptor trafficking and signal transduction. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[57]  Boris N Kholodenko,et al.  MAP kinase cascade signaling and endocytic trafficking: a marriage of convenience? , 2002, Trends in cell biology.

[58]  Elizabeth Pennisi,et al.  Tracing Life's Circuitry , 2003, Science.

[59]  K. Kaneko,et al.  Transitions induced by the discreteness of molecules in a small autocatalytic system. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[60]  Jan Lankelma,et al.  Principles behind the multifarious control of signal transduction , 2004, The FEBS journal.

[61]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[62]  Joan Massagu,et al.  How cells read TGF-|[beta]| signals , 2000 .

[63]  Luis Serrano,et al.  Space as the final frontier in stochastic simulations of biological systems , 2005, FEBS letters.

[64]  U. Bhalla Signaling in small subcellular volumes. I. Stochastic and diffusion effects on individual pathways. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[65]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[66]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  Mathematical models of protein kinase signal transduction. , 2002, Molecular cell.