A high throughput screening system of coils for ELF magnetic fields experiments: proof of concept on the proliferation of cancer cell lines

BackgroundIt has been demonstrated that relatively small variations of the parameters of exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) can change significantly the outcome of experiments. Hence, either in trying to elucidate if these fields are carcinogenic, or in exploring their possible therapeutic use, it is desirable to screen through as many different exposures as possible. The purpose of this work is to provide a proof of concept of how a recently reported system of coils allows testing different field exposures, in a single experiment.MethodsUsing a novel exposure system, we subjected a glioblastoma cancer cell line (U251) to three different time modulations of an ELF-MF at 60 different combinations of the alternated current (AC) and direct current (DC) components of the field. One of those three time modulations was also tested on another cell line, MDA-MB-231 (breast cancer). After exposure, proliferation was assessed by colorimetric assays.ResultsFor the U251 cells, a total of 180 different exposures were tested in three different experiments. Depending on exposure modulation and AC field intensity (but, remarkably, not on DC intensity), we found the three possible outcomes: increase (14.3% above control, p < 0.01), decrease (16.6% below control, p < 0.001), and also no-effect on proliferation with respect to control. Only the time modulation that inhibited proliferation of U251 was also tested on MDA-MB-231 cells which, in contrast, showed no alteration of their proliferation on any of the 60 AC/DC field combinations tested.ConclusionsWe demonstrated, for the first time, the use of a novel system of coils for magnetobiology research, which allowed us to find that differences of only a few μT resulted in statistically different results. Not only does our study demonstrate the relevance of the time modulation and the importance of finely sweeping through the AC and DC amplitudes, but also, and most importantly, provides a proof of concept of a system that sensibly reduces the time and costs of screening.

[1]  L. Verschaeve,et al.  Effect of coexposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields and an aneugen on human lymphocytes, determined by the cytokinesis block micronucleus assay , 2003, Bioelectromagnetics.

[2]  V. V. Novikov,et al.  Effect of weak combined static and extremely low‐frequency alternating magnetic fields on tumor growth in mice inoculated with the Ehrlich ascites carcinoma , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[3]  M Feychting,et al.  A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  M. Trillo,et al.  Retinoic acid inhibits the cytoproliferative response to weak 50-Hz magnetic fields in neuroblastoma cells , 2012, Oncology reports.

[5]  Naohito Yamaguchi,et al.  Childhood leukemia and magnetic fields in Japan: A case‐control study of childhood leukemia and residential power‐frequency magnetic fields in Japan , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[6]  M. Markov,et al.  Magnetic Field Therapy: A Review , 2007, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[7]  K. Varani,et al.  The Anti-Tumor Effect of A3 Adenosine Receptors Is Potentiated by Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields in Cultured Neural Cancer Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  Richard H W Funk,et al.  Electromagnetic effects - From cell biology to medicine. , 2009, Progress in histochemistry and cytochemistry.

[9]  J. Schüz.  Exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and the risk of childhood cancer: update of the epidemiological evidence. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[10]  Christopher C Davis,et al.  Effect of magnetic fields on tumor growth and viability. , 2011, Comparative medicine.

[11]  Husheng Zhang,et al.  EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCY (ELF) PULSED‐GRADIENT MAGNETIC FIELDS INHIBIT MALIGNANT TUMOUR GROWTH AT DIFFERENT BIOLOGICAL LEVELS , 2002, Cell biology international.

[12]  I. Belyaev,et al.  Exposure to ELF magnetic field tuned to Zn inhibits growth of cancer cells , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[13]  R. Lafrenie,et al.  Inhibition of Cancer Cell Growth by Exposure to a Specific Time-Varying Electromagnetic Field Involves T-Type Calcium Channels , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  I. Belyaev,et al.  Effect of static magnetic field on E. coli cells and individual rotations of ion-protein complexes. , 2001, Bioelectromagnetics.

[15]  Catrin Bauréus Koch,et al.  Interaction between weak low frequency magnetic fields and cell membranes , 2003, Bioelectromagnetics.

[16]  G. Gervino,et al.  Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields affect proliferation and mitochondrial activity of human cancer cell lines , 2015, International journal of radiation biology.

[17]  I. Belyaev,et al.  EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses , 2016, Reviews on environmental health.

[18]  Nenad Filipovic,et al.  Electromagnetic field investigation on different cancer cell lines , 2014, Cancer Cell International.

[19]  Jianhua Li,et al.  Natural static magnetic field-induced apoptosis in liver cancer cell , 2014, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[20]  M. Trillo,et al.  Influence of a 50 Hz magnetic field and of all-trans‑retinol on the proliferation of human cancer cell lines. , 2012, International journal of oncology.

[21]  I. Cosic,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) on survival of the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus , 2013 .

[22]  Myrtill Simkó,et al.  Cell type specific redox status is responsible for diverse electromagnetic field effects. , 2007, Current medicinal chemistry.

[23]  A. Liboff,et al.  Bioelectromagnetic medicine: The role of resonance signaling , 2013, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[24]  R. Lafrenie,et al.  Growth of injected melanoma cells is suppressed by whole body exposure to specific spatial-temporal configurations of weak intensity magnetic fields , 2010, International journal of radiation biology.

[25]  P. Liu,et al.  Zanthoxylum usambarense (Engl.) Kokwaro (Rutaceae) Extracts Inhibit the Growth of the Breast Cancer Cell Lines MDA‐MB‐231 and MCF‐7, But Not the Brain Tumour Cell Line U251 In Vitro , 2013, Phytotherapy research : PTR.

[26]  N. Cherry.  Schumann Resonances, a plausible biophysical mechanism for the human health effects of Solar , 2002 .

[27]  Giulia Grisolia,et al.  An engineering thermodynamic approach to select the electromagnetic wave effective on cell growth. , 2017, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  Y. Mou,et al.  Effect of low frequency magnetic fields on melanoma: tumor inhibition and immune modulation , 2013, BMC Cancer.

[29]  R. Lafrenie,et al.  The effects of electromagnetic fields on B16‐BL6 cells are dependent on their spatial and temporal character , 2017, Bioelectromagnetics.

[30]  E. A. Navarro,et al.  Solar storm effects during Saint Patrick's Days in 2013 and 2015 on the Schumann resonances measured by the ELF station at Sierra Nevada (Spain) , 2016 .

[31]  M. Rycroft,et al.  Solar and geomagnetic activity, extremely low frequency magnetic and electric fields and human health at the Earth’s surface , 2006 .

[32]  Ferdinando Bersani,et al.  Effect of extremely low frequency magnetic field exposure on DNA transposition in relation to frequency, wave shape and exposure time , 2011, International journal of radiation biology.

[33]  N. Kuster,et al.  DNA fragmentation in human fibroblasts under extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure. , 2010, Mutation research.

[34]  L. Makinistian.  A novel system of coils for magnetobiology research. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[35]  Nicola Pasquino,et al.  Exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic field raises the levels of the anti‐apoptotic protein BAG3 in melanoma cells , 2011, Journal of cellular physiology.

[36]  D. House,et al.  Effect of ac and dc magnetic field orientation on nerve cells. , 1996, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[37]  I. Belyaev,et al.  Effects of Weak ELF on E. Coli Cells and Human Lymphocytes: Role of Genetic, Physiological, and Physical Parameters , 1999 .

[38]  F S Prato,et al.  Behavioural evidence that magnetic field effects in the land snail, Cepaea nemoralis, might not depend on magnetite or induced electric currents. , 1996, Bioelectromagnetics.

[39]  I. Belyaev,et al.  Frequency-dependent effects of ELF magnetic field on chromatin conformation in Escherichia coli cells and human lymphocytes. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[40]  J. Elder,et al.  Double blind test of magnetic field effects on neurite outgrowth. , 1998, Bioelectromagnetics.

[41]  D. Savitz,et al.  INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON NON-IONIZING RADIATION PROTECTION , 2011 .

[42]  I. Belyaev,et al.  Fifty hertz magnetic fields individually affect chromatin conformation in human lymphocytes: Dependence on amplitude, temperature, and initial chromatin state , 2011, Bioelectromagnetics.

[43]  E. A. Flinn,et al.  Effects of low-frequency magnetic fields on bacterial growth rate. , 1981, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  N. Soda,et al.  Effects of combined DC and AC magnetic fields on germination of hornwort seeds , 2004, Bioelectromagnetics.

[45]  D. House,et al.  The influence of 1.2 microT, 60 Hz magnetic fields on melatonin- and tamoxifen-induced inhibition of MCF-7 cell growth. , 2001, Bioelectromagnetics.

[46]  I. Belyaev,et al.  Magnetic field inhomogeneities due to CO2 incubator shelves: a source of experimental confounding and variability? , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[47]  L. Dini,et al.  Effects of extremely low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (ELF-PEMFs) on glioblastoma cells (U87) , 2017, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[48]  H. Berg,et al.  Bioelectromagnetic Field Effects on Cancer Cells and Mice Tumors , 2010, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[49]  Mark E. Anderson,et al.  Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter Activity Is Dispensable for MDA-MB-231 Breast Carcinoma Cell Survival , 2014, PloS one.

[50]  K. Jokela,et al.  ICNIRP Guidelines GUIDELINES FOR LIMITING EXPOSURE TO TIME-VARYING , 1998 .

[51]  I. Belyaev,et al.  ELF magnetic field affects proliferation of SPD8/V79 Chinese hamster cells but does not interact with intrachromosomal recombination. , 2001, Mutation research.

[52]  Alexander Pilger,et al.  Induction of DNA strand breaks by intermittent exposure to extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields in human diploid fibroblasts. , 2002, Mutation research.

[53]  I. Belyaev,et al.  Cell density dependent response of E. Coli cells to weak ELF magnetic fields , 1998 .

[54]  Vladimir N. Binhi,et al.  Magnetobiology: Underlying Physical Problems , 2002 .

[55]  E. A. Flinn,et al.  Magnetic fields affect the lac operon system. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[56]  M. Balser,et al.  Observations of Earth–Ionosphere Cavity Resonances , 1960, Nature.

[57]  S. Grimaldi,et al.  New Perspectives of Bioelectromagnetics in Biology and in Medicine: DNA Spectra for Diagnostic Purposes , 2011 .

[58]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.