Depressed trajectory SLBMs: A technical evaluation and arms control possibilities

SLBMs (sea-launched ballistic missiles) flown on depressed trajectories would have short flight times, comparable to escape times of bombers and launch times of ICBMs, thus raising the possibility of short time-of-flight (STOF) nuclear attacks. We assess the depressed trajectory (DT) capability of existing SLBMs by calculating the flight times, atmospheric loading on the booster, reentry heating on the reentry vehicle (RV), and degradation of accuracy for a DT SLBM. We find that current US and CIS SLBMs flown on depressed trajectories would have the capability to attack bomber bases at ranges of up to about 2,000 kilometers, and possibly at ranges up to 3,000 kilometers. To target bombers based furthest inland, a new high-velocity booster might be required, and attacking hardened targets would require a maneuvering RV (MaRV). We conclude that DT capabilities could be effectively controlled by the combination of an apogee restriction on the flight testing of existing SLBMs and bans on the development of high-velocity boosters and MaRVs, and that, in view of their inherent STOF capabilities, deep cuts in the number of SLBMs or their elimination might be desirable for an optimal minimum-deterrent force structure.

[1]  J. J. Pettus,et al.  A phenomenological framework for re-entry dispersion source modeling , 1977 .

[2]  S. Rounds,et al.  Stellar-inertial guidance capabilities for advanced ICBM , 1983 .

[3]  Jinshi Cai On Rolling Resonance and Slightly Asymmetrical Aerodynamic Force of the Reentry Body , 1986 .

[4]  C Norman House Votes Ban on Low-Flying Missiles: A little-noticed amendment would bar work on nuclear missiles designed to hit targets quickly; measure gains broad support. , 1988, Science.

[5]  DAVID C. WRIGHT,et al.  Underflying Brilliant Pebbles , 1991, Nature.

[6]  Matthew G. Bunn The next nuclear offensive , 1988 .

[7]  Paul Zarchan,et al.  Tactical and strategic missile guidance , 1990 .

[8]  Dietrich Schroeer Science, technology, and the nuclear arms race , 1984 .

[9]  P. Dolan,et al.  The Effects of Nuclear Weapons. Third edition , 1977 .

[10]  W J Burns Abres flight test evaluation of RV accuracy , 1974 .

[11]  Gregory F. Treverton,et al.  Space and National Security , 1987 .

[12]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .

[13]  L S Glover,et al.  The Motion of Ballistic Missiles , 1971 .

[14]  Thomas B. Cochran,et al.  Soviet Nuclear Weapons , 1989 .

[15]  Robert Clifton Duncan Dynamics of atmospheric entry , 1962 .

[16]  Ashton B. Carter Directed energy missile defense in space , 1984 .

[17]  Frank J. Regan Re-entry vehicle dynamics , 1984 .

[18]  Samuel Glasstone,et al.  The Effects of Nuclear Weapons , 1952 .

[19]  H. King,et al.  Ballistic missile re-entry dispersion , 1980 .

[20]  Michael E. Brown The U.S. Manned Bomber and Strategic Deterrence in the 1990s , 1989 .

[21]  G. Spinardi Why the U.S. Navy Went for Hard-target Counterforce in Trident II: (And Why It Didn't Get There Sooner) , 1990 .

[22]  F. von Hippel,et al.  Beyond START: How to Make Much Deeper Cuts , 1990 .

[23]  H. P. Liepman Analysis of Boundary Layer Transition Effects on Ballistic Reentry Vehicle Impact Dispersion and Comparison with Other Dispersion Factors , 1975 .

[24]  I. Tani,et al.  Boundary-Layer Transition , 1969 .

[25]  William M. Arkin Sleight of hand with Trident II , 1984 .

[26]  The Science and Technology of Directed-Energy Weapons , 1989 .