User Empowerment and Audience Commodification in a Commercial Television Context

This paper aims to provide insights into the concept of ‘user empowerment’ in current –digital and connected- media industries. We start by defining empowerment as a concept rooted in certain research traditions that focus on user behaviour and capabilities in dealing with digital and connected technologies and the production, aggregation, distribution and consumption of content. We then oppose ‘user empowerment’ to ‘audience commodification’, a concept that highlights how the audience and its members are exploited by the media industry through their usage of digital and connected technologies. This research tradition typically looks at the meso-level of media usage and how it is embedded in the media industries. In light of this paper on media innovations, we then argue that the concepts of ‘empowerment’ and ‘commodification’ are strongly embedded in the underlying social imaginaries. This helps us to redefine ‘user empowerment’ and ‘audience commodification’ as interactive processes underlying innovation within the (commercial) media industry. We use the case of Flemish commercial television to demonstrate this hypothesis.

[1]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  Opportunities and Thresholds for Advertising on Interactive Digital TV , 2006 .

[2]  D. Smythe.  Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism , 1977 .

[3]  R. Mansell.  From Digital Divides to Digital Entitlements in Knowledge Societies , 2002 .

[4]  Wendy Van den Broeck,et al.  The promises of iDTV: Between push marketing and consumer needs , 2011, Telematics Informatics.

[5]  M. Castells.  Communication Power: Mass Communication, Mass Self-Communication and Power Relationships in the Network Society , 2009, Media and Society.

[6]  Jo Pierson,et al.  Online Privacy in Social Media: A Conceptual Exploration of Empowerment and Vulnerability , 2012 .

[7]  William S. Harvey.  Strategies for conducting elite interviews , 2011 .

[8]  Fernando Bermejo,et al.  Audience manufacture in historical perspective: from broadcasting to Google , 2009, New Media Soc..

[9]  Göran Bolin.  THE LABOUR OF MEDIA USE , 2012 .

[10]  C. Fuchs.  Dallas Smythe Today - The Audience Commodity, the Digital Labour Debate, Marxist Political Economy and Critical Theory. Prolegomena to a Digital Labour Theory of Value. , 2012 .

[11]  Matt Carlson,et al.  Tapping into TiVo , 2006, New Media Soc..

[12]  Mijke Slot,et al.  Changing user roles in ICT developments; the case of digital television , 2007, Telematics Informatics.

[13]  Göran Bolin.  The Labour of Media Use : The Two Active Audiences , 2011 .

[14]  Melanie Grunwald,et al.  Convergence Culture Where Old And New Media Collide , 2016 .

[15]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[16]  M. Andrejevic.  The work of being watched: interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure , 2002 .

[17]  M. Michalis.  Imagining the Internet: Communication, Innovation, and Governance , 2013 .

[18]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as freedom , 1999 .

[19]  J. Rappaport.  Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology , 1987, American journal of community psychology.

[20]  Wendy Van den Broeck,et al.  The promises of iDTV: between push marketing and consumer needs , 2009, EuroITV '09.

[21]  Pyungho Kim,et al.  A machine-like new medium - theoretical examination of interactive TV , 2002 .

[22]  Philip M. Napoli.  Audience Economics: Media Institutions and the Audience Marketplace , 2003 .

[23]  T. Chambers.  Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences , 2011 .