Antenna Matching for Capacity Maximization in Compact MIMO Systems

As MIMO technology slowly matures, it is finding its way into more wireless applications. However, some important applications, including mobile communications, require compact implementations. One important challenge in miniaturizing MIMO systems for compact terminals is to overcome capacity performance degradation resulting from mutual coupling among closely separated antennas. In this contribution, we begin with a review of the state-of-the-art, with particular emphasis on impedance matching and its impact on capacity. Whereas it has been shown that a multiport extension of the conjugate match is optimum in a reference environment with uniform 3D angular power spectrum, its bandwidth is severely reduced by decreasing antenna separation. On the other hand, noncoupled, individual port matching is inherently simpler to implement and broader in bandwidth, but offers a smaller capacity. Here, we demonstrate that mean capacity can be easily maximized with respect to individual port matching in a given random field. The extent of capacity gains provided by the optimized matching network over existing individual port matching networks strongly depends on the propagation environment.

[1]  Hüseyin Arslan,et al.  Dynamics of spatial correlation and implications on MIMO systems , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Preben E. Mogensen,et al.  A stochastic MIMO radio channel model with experimental validation , 2002, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[3]  Rodney G. Vaughan,et al.  Channels, Propagation and Antennas for Mobile Communications , 2003 .

[4]  Suhas N. Diggavi,et al.  Great expectations: the value of spatial diversity in wireless networks , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  A.F. Molisch,et al.  Capacity analysis for compact MIMO systems , 2005, 2005 IEEE 61st Vehicular Technology Conference.

[6]  B.D. Van Veen,et al.  Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering , 1988, IEEE ASSP Magazine.

[7]  Jan Carlsson,et al.  Maximizing the effective diversity gain of two parallel dipoles by optimizing the source impedances , 2006 .

[8]  Roger F. Harrington,et al.  Antenna excitation for maximum gain , 1965 .

[9]  A. Nix,et al.  Mutual coupling in multi-element array antennas and its influence on MIMO channel capacity , 2003 .

[10]  Heinz J. Chaloupka,et al.  Novel approach for diversity and MIMO antennas at small mobile platforms , 2004, 2004 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8754).

[11]  Karl J. Molnar,et al.  Adaptive antennas for GSM and TDMA systems , 1999, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[12]  Buon Kiong Lau,et al.  On Closely Coupled Dipoles with Load Matching in a Random Field , 2006, 2006 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[13]  Sergey N. Makarov,et al.  Antenna and EM Modeling with MATLAB , 2002 .

[14]  M. J. Gans,et al.  On Limits of Wireless Communications in a Fading Environment when Using Multiple Antennas , 1998, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[15]  Buon Kiong Lau,et al.  Impact of Matching Network on Bandwidth of Compact Antenna Arrays , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[16]  David Gesbert,et al.  From theory to practice: an overview of MIMO space-time coded wireless systems , 2003, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[17]  J.B. Andersen,et al.  On closely coupled dipoles in a random field , 2006, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[18]  John S. Thompson,et al.  Experiments of closely coupled monopoles with load matching in a random field , 2006, 2006 First European Conference on Antennas and Propagation.

[19]  M.A. Jensen,et al.  Termination-dependent diversity performance of coupled antennas: network theory analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[20]  Jack H. Winters,et al.  On the Capacity of Radio Communication Systems with Diversity in a Rayleigh Fading Environment , 1987, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[21]  Buon Kiong Lau,et al.  Impact of matching network on the capacity of compact MIMO systems , 2006 .

[22]  P. Kildal,et al.  Electromagnetic analysis of effective and apparent diversity gain of two parallel dipoles , 2003, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[23]  Emre Telatar,et al.  Capacity of Multi-antenna Gaussian Channels , 1999, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[24]  Rodney G. Vaughan,et al.  Closely spaced monopoles for mobile communications , 1993 .

[25]  R.G. Vaughan,et al.  Antenna diversity in mobile communications , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[26]  Luc Vandendorpe,et al.  Mutual coupling effects on the channel capacity and the space-time processing of MIMO communication systems , 2003, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003. ICC '03..

[27]  Andreas F. Molisch,et al.  Wireless Communications , 2005 .

[28]  Thomas Svantesson,et al.  Mutual coupling effects on the capacity of multielement antenna systems , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221).

[29]  Michael A. Jensen,et al.  Mutual coupling in MIMO wireless systems: a rigorous network theory analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[30]  J. Romeu,et al.  Optimum antenna matching to minimise signal correlation on a two-port antenna diversity system , 2004 .

[31]  Volker Jungnickel,et al.  Capacity of MIMO systems with closely spaced antennas , 2003, IEEE Communications Letters.

[32]  R. Janaswamy Effect of element mutual coupling on the capacity of fixed length linear arrays , 2002, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[33]  Christian Waldschmidt,et al.  Complete RF system model for analysis of compact MIMO arrays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[34]  S. Verdú,et al.  Capacity of MIMO channels with one-sided correlation , 2004, Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications - Programme and Book of Abstracts (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8738).