An approximate stance map of the spring mass hopper with gravity correction for nonsymmetric locomotions

The Spring-Loaded Inverted Pendulum (SLIP) model has long been established as an effective and accurate descriptive model for running animals of widely differing sizes and morphologies, while also serving as a basis for several hopping robot designs. Further research on this model led to the discovery of several analytic approximations to its normally nonintegrable dynamics. However, these approximations mostly focus on steady-state running with symmetric trajectories due to their linearization of gravitational effects, an assumption that is quickly violated for locomotion on more complex terrain wherein transient, non-symmetric trajectories dominate. In this paper, we introduce a novel gravity correction scheme that extends on one of the more recent analytic approximations to the SLIP dynamics and achieves good accuracy even for highly non-symmetric trajectories. Our approach is based on incorporating the total effect of gravity on the angular momentum throughout a single stance phase and allows us to preserve the analytic simplicity of the approximation to support our longer term research on reactive footstep planning for dynamic legged locomotion. We compare the performance of our method in simulation to two other existing analytic approximations and show that it outperforms them for most physically realistic non-symmetric SLIP trajectories while maintaining the same accuracy for symmetric trajectories.

[1]  Marc H. Raibert,et al.  Legged Robots That Balance , 1986, IEEE Expert.

[2]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Similarity in multilegged locomotion: Bouncing like a monopode , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  A. Arampatzis,et al.  The effect of speed on leg stiffness and joint kinetics in human running. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  P. Holmes Poincaré, celestial mechanics, dynamical-systems theory and “chaos” , 1990 .

[5]  R J Full,et al.  Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  10 Biomechanics of Walking and Running: Center of Mass Movements to Muscle Action , 1998, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[7]  R. McN. Alexander,et al.  Three Uses for Springs in Legged Locomotion , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  Garth Zeglin,et al.  The bow leg hopping robot , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[9]  Joel E. Chestnutt,et al.  Design and Philosophy of the BiMASC, a Highly Dynamic Biped , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  H. Benjamin Brown,et al.  Evidence for Spring Loaded Inverted Pendulum Running in a Hexapod Robot , 2000, ISER.

[11]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Spring loaded inverted pendulum running: a plant model , 1998 .

[12]  John Guckenheimer,et al.  Control of a spring-mass hopper , 2003 .

[13]  R. Alexander,et al.  Vertical movements in walking and running , 2009 .

[14]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Spring-mass running: simple approximate solution and application to gait stability. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Sequential Composition of Dynamically Dexterous Robot Behaviors , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Template based control of hexapedal running , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[17]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Approximating the Stance Map of a 2-DOF Monoped Runner , 2000, J. Nonlinear Sci..

[18]  Martin Buehler,et al.  Design, control, and energetics of an electrically actuated legged robot , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.