A review on policy instruments for sustainable food consumption

[1]  J. von Braun,et al.  True cost of food and land degradation , 2022, Russian Journal of Economics.

[2]  Bernadette Sütterlin,et al.  Consumers’ knowledge gain through a cross-category environmental label , 2021 .

[3]  J. Boer,et al.  Climate change and species decline: Distinct sources of European consumer concern supporting more sustainable diets , 2021 .

[4]  Jessica A. Gephart,et al.  Viewpoint: Rigorous monitoring is necessary to guide food system transformation in the countdown to the 2030 global goals , 2021, Food Policy.

[5]  Anna H. Grummon,et al.  Testing front-of-package warnings to discourage red meat consumption: a randomized experiment with US meat consumers , 2021, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[6]  H. Hsu,et al.  Cross-Cultural Comparison of Sustainable Agro-Food Consumption from Consumers’ Perspectives: Cases from Taiwan and France , 2021, Sustainability.

[7]  Yixing Tian,et al.  Who responds to health, environmental, and economic information about local food? Evidence from Connecticut seafood consumers , 2021, Aquaculture Economics & Management.

[8]  Anja Weber.  Mobile apps as a sustainable shopping guide: The effect of eco-score rankings on sustainable food choice , 2021, Appetite.

[9]  C. Díaz‐Caro,et al.  Understanding consumer attitudes towards ecolabeled food products: A latent class analysis regarding their purchasing motivations , 2021, Agribusiness.

[10]  A. Kusá,et al.  Testing of Standardized Advertising Slogans Within the Marketing Communication of Sustainable and Local Foods in Order to Reveal Consumer Preferences , 2021, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems.

[11]  Natalia Maehle,et al.  Developing Sustainable Food Systems in Europe: National Policies and Stakeholder Perspectives in a Four-Country Analysis , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[12]  Amanda J. Lee,et al.  Affordability of current, and healthy, more equitable, sustainable diets by area of socioeconomic disadvantage and remoteness in Queensland: insights into food choice , 2021, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[13]  S. Yeğenoğlu,et al.  Innovative approaches to healthy nutrition and sustainable food matters by concerned parties: Insights from the INPROFOOD project (case study: Turkey) Turkey's outputs from INPROFOOD , 2021 .

[14]  Vranken Liesbet,et al.  A combined Nutri-Score and ‘Eco-Score’ approach for more nutritious and more environmentally friendly food choices? Evidence from a consumer experiment in Belgium , 2021 .

[15]  C. Sunstein,et al.  What Do People Want to Know? Information Avoidance and Food Policy Implications , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  C. Lagerkvist,et al.  Is food labelling effective in reducing climate impact by encouraging the substitution of protein sources? , 2021 .

[17]  Jantsje M. Mol,et al.  Changing Diets – Testing the Impact of Knowledge and Information Nudges on Sustainable Dietary Choices , 2021, Journal of Environmental Psychology.

[18]  Priyanko Guchait,et al.  When normative framing saves Mr. Nature: Role of consumer efficacy in proenvironmental adoption , 2021 .

[19]  Xiang Li,et al.  Less Is Better: How Nutrition and Low-Carbon Labels Jointly Backfire on the Evaluation of Food Products , 2021, Nutrients.

[20]  Nicolas Treich,et al.  Is Meat Too Cheap? Towards Optimal Meat Taxation , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[21]  Z. Hendrickson,et al.  Community engagement and the promotion of sustainable diets: Lessons from a grassroots meat reduction campaign , 2021 .

[22]  J. Geleijnse,et al.  Paying the price for environmentally sustainable and healthy EU diets , 2021, Global Food Security.

[23]  Fei Han,et al.  Consumers’ preferences for health-related and low-carbon attributes of rice: A choice experiment , 2021 .

[24]  Carmen Valor,et al.  Designed to Be Noticed: A Reconceptualization of Carbon Food Labels as Warning Labels , 2021, Sustainability.

[25]  Bui Bich Xuan.  Consumer preference for eco-labelled aquaculture products in Vietnam , 2021 .

[26]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  Mitigating climate change via food consumption and food waste: A systematic map of behavioral interventions , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[27]  S. Marette,et al.  Importance of additional information, as a complement to information coming from packaging, to promote meat substitutes: A case study on a sausage based on vegetable proteins , 2021 .

[28]  R. Birner,et al.  The potential of carbon neutral labeling to engage coffee consumers in climate change mitigation , 2021 .

[29]  Gordon Hodson,et al.  A brief nudge or education intervention delivered online can increase willingness to order a beef-mushroom burger , 2021 .

[30]  Mariarosaria Simeone,et al.  Sustainable consumption: How does social media affect food choices? , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[31]  Karolin Schmidt.  Behavioral effects of guideline-provision on climate-friendly food choices – A psychological perspective , 2020 .

[32]  Adrian W. Müller,et al.  Sustainable and healthy diets: Synergies and trade‐offs in Switzerland , 2020 .

[33]  J. M. Ramírez-Hurtado,et al.  Narrowing the gap between consumer purchasing intention and behaviour through ecolabelling: a challenge for eco-entrepreneurism , 2020 .

[34]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Shaping Physical, Economic, and Policy Components of the Food Environment to Create Sustainable Healthy Diets , 2020, Food and nutrition bulletin.

[35]  J. Bradbury,et al.  A cross-sectional survey of the readiness of consumers to adopt an environmentally sustainable diet , 2020, Nutrition Journal.

[36]  Linchuan Yang,et al.  University Students’ Purchase Intention and Willingness to Pay for Carbon-Labeled Food Products: A Purchase Decision-Making Experiment , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[37]  K. Ameer,et al.  Strategies for Sustainable Substitution of Livestock Meat , 2020, Foods.

[38]  L. Becchetti,et al.  Nudging and corporate environmental responsibility: A natural field experiment , 2020, Food Policy.

[39]  R. Mihailescu,et al.  Preferences for eco certified wines in the United States , 2020 .

[40]  Fred Lemke,et al.  The effect of traffic-light labels and time pressure on estimating kilocalories and carbon footprint of food , 2020, Appetite.

[41]  M. Kaljonen,et al.  From isolated labels and nudges to sustained tinkering: assessing long-term changes in sustainable eating at a lunch restaurant , 2020, British Food Journal.

[42]  H. Górska-Warsewicz,et al.  Towards Sustainable Private Labels—What is the Consumer Behavior Relating to Private Labels in the UK and Poland? , 2020, Sustainability.

[43]  N. Stroebele-Benschop,et al.  Effects of a documentary on consumer perception of the environmental impact of meat consumption , 2020 .

[44]  N. Langen,et al.  Sustainable changes in a worksite canteen: An exploratory study on the acceptance of guests , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[45]  S. Cardoso,et al.  Green Light for Climate-friendly Food Transitions? Communicating Legal Innovation Increases Consumer Support for Meat Curtailment Policies , 2020, Environmental Communication.

[46]  M. Escribano,et al.  Consumer Assessment of Sustainability Traits in Meat Production. A Choice Experiment Study in Spain , 2020, Sustainability.

[47]  E. Temme,et al.  A social cost-benefit analysis of meat taxation and a fruit and vegetables subsidy for a healthy and sustainable food consumption in the Netherlands , 2020, BMC Public Health.

[48]  N. Langen,et al.  When A Combination of Nudges Decreases Sustainable Food Choices Out-of-Home—The Example of Food Decoys and Descriptive Name Labels , 2020, Foods.

[49]  M. Zanini,et al.  Sustainability certifications and product preference , 2020 .

[50]  L. Camanzi,et al.  Nutrition, hedonic or environmental? The effect of front-of-pack messages on consumers' perception and purchase intention of a novel food product with multiple attributes. , 2020, Food research international.

[51]  Albert von Ow,et al.  Environmental optimization of the Swiss population’s diet using domestic production resources , 2020 .

[52]  H. Górska-Warsewicz,et al.  Impact of Food Sustainability Labels on the Perceived Product Value and Price Expectations of Urban Consumers , 2019, Sustainability.

[53]  C. Mazzocchi,et al.  Consumers’ preferences for biodiversity in vineyards: A choice experiment on wine , 2019, Wine Economics and Policy.

[54]  J. Yang,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Eco-Labeled Food in Forests: Integrated View from South Korea , 2019 .

[55]  M. Barker,et al.  Food Purchasing Decisions and Environmental Ideology: An Exploratory Survey of UK Shoppers , 2019, Sustainability.

[56]  A. Johnstone,et al.  Nudging, formulating new products, and the lifecourse: A qualitative assessment of the viability of three methods for reducing Scottish meat consumption for health, ethical, and environmental reasons , 2019, Appetite.

[57]  F. McLeay,et al.  To meat or not to meat? Comparing empowered meat consumers’ and anti-consumers’ preferences for sustainability labels , 2019, Food Quality and Preference.

[58]  Joshua Tasoff,et al.  Eating to Save the Planet: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial using Individual-Level Food Purchase Data , 2019, Food Policy.

[59]  M. Osman,et al.  Traffic light labelling of meals to promote sustainable consumption and healthy eating , 2019, Appetite.

[60]  C. Larsson,et al.  Pupils’ Participation in and Response to Sustainable Food Education in Swedish Home and Consumer Studies: A Case-Study , 2019 .

[61]  I. Vermeir,et al.  Show Me More! The Influence of Visibility on Sustainable Food Choices , 2019, Foods.

[62]  K. I. Karevold,et al.  Simple Eco-Labels to Nudge Customers Toward the Most Environmentally Friendly Warm Dishes: An Empirical Study in a Cafeteria Setting , 2019, Front. Sustain. Food Syst..

[63]  J. Shao.  Sustainable consumption in China: New trends and research interests , 2019, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[64]  E. Penz,et al.  Explaining consumer choice of low carbon footprint goods using the behavioral spillover effect in German-speaking countries , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[65]  Leena Lankoski,et al.  Promoting Sustainable Consumer Behaviour Through the Activation of Injunctive Social Norms: A Field Experiment in 19 Workplace Restaurants , 2019, Organization & Environment.

[66]  A. Lacroix,et al.  Environmental Labelling and Consumption Changes: A Food Choice Experiment , 2019, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[67]  Erin M. Silva,et al.  Attitudes of dining customers towards sustainability-related food values at a public University campus , 2019, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[68]  E. Jeong,et al.  The effect of message framings and green practices on customers’ attitudes and behavior intentions toward green restaurants , 2019, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.

[69]  Michael S. Delgado,et al.  The Promising Effect of a Green Food Label in the New Online Market , 2019, Sustainability.

[70]  K. Bissinger.  Sustainability Labels: Are Price Premia Relevant in Online Food Retailing? , 2019, Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing.

[71]  J. Leenheer,et al.  Towards more interactive and sustainable food retailing , 2019, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management.

[72]  M. Escribano,et al.  Perception of Spanish consumers towards environmentally friendly labelling in food , 2019, International Journal of Consumer Studies.

[73]  Zhifeng Gao,et al.  Eco-labeling in the Fresh Produce Market: Not All Environmentally Friendly Labels Are Equally Valued , 2018, Ecological Economics.

[74]  Liang Meng,et al.  Environmental-friendly Eco-labeling Matters: Evidences From an ERPs Study , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[75]  Gianna A. Lazzarini,et al.  How to improve consumers' environmental sustainability judgements of foods , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[76]  K. Shirahada,et al.  The impact of product labels on green preferences and perceptions of customers: an empirical study of milk products in Japan , 2018 .

[77]  D. Robinson,et al.  Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins , 2018, Sustainability Science.

[78]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  A Social Norms Intervention Going Wrong: Boomerang Effects from Descriptive Norms Information , 2018, Sustainability.

[79]  T. Næs,et al.  Young consumers' preferences for water-saving wines: An experimental study , 2018, Wine Economics and Policy.

[80]  Ernest Baskin,et al.  It's a match when green meets healthy in sustainability labeling , 2018 .

[81]  S. Chuanmin,et al.  Consumer behaviour on low-carbon agri-food purchase: a carbon labelling experimental study in China , 2018 .

[82]  K. Zander,et al.  Consumers' preferences for carbon labels and the underlying reasoning. A mixed methods approach in 6 European countries , 2017 .

[83]  K. Teichmann,et al.  A facts panel on corporate social and environmental behavior: Decreasing information asymmetries between producers and consumers through product labeling , 2017 .

[84]  Azucena Gracia,et al.  Do consumers care about European food labels? An empirical evaluation using best-worst method , 2017 .

[85]  D. Hilton,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Recall and Carbon Taxation on the Carbon Footprint of Supermarket Shopping , 2017 .

[86]  J. Maher,et al.  Experiential learning for engaging nutrition undergraduates with sustainability , 2017 .

[87]  Jennifer L. Stevens,et al.  Eat Green, Get Lean: Promoting Sustainability Reduces Consumption , 2017 .

[88]  M. Simeone,et al.  Which are the sustainable attributes affecting the real consumption behaviour? Consumer understanding and choices , 2017 .

[89]  Xiaohua Yu,et al.  Habit spillovers or induced awareness: Willingness to pay for eco-labels of rice in China , 2017 .

[90]  F. Wolff,et al.  Effects and success factors of sustainable consumption policy instruments: a comparative assessment across Europe , 2017 .

[91]  K. Menrad,et al.  Carbon information on vegetables: How does it affect the buying process? , 2017 .

[92]  S. Friel,et al.  Healthy and environmentally sustainable food choices: Consumer responses to point-of-purchase actions , 2017 .

[93]  J. Lay,et al.  Household Welfare and CO2 Emission Impacts of Energy and Carbon Taxes in Mexico , 2017 .

[94]  N. Velikova,et al.  A discrete choice experiment of the impact of consumers’ environmental values, ethical concerns, and health consciousness on food choices , 2017 .

[95]  Dong-Mo Koo,et al.  The impact of consumer confusion from eco-labels on negative WOM, distrust, and dissatisfaction , 2017 .

[96]  M. Ertz,et al.  How Consumers React to Environmental Information: An Experimental Study , 2017 .

[97]  Qing Liu,et al.  Consumer Choices and Motives for Eco-Labeled Products in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Choice Experiment , 2017 .

[98]  David Marshall,et al.  ‘Nudging’ as an architect of more responsible consumer choice in food service provision: The role of restaurant menu design , 2017 .

[99]  B. Rocchi,et al.  Environmental friendly food. Choice experiment to assess consumer's attitude toward “climate neutral” milk: the role of communication , 2017 .

[100]  Adriana Reis de Andrade Silva,et al.  Impact of sustainability labeling in the perception of sensory quality and purchase intention of chocolate consumers , 2017 .

[101]  S. Sillani,et al.  Consumer Behavior Toward Eco-Labeled Minimally Processed Fruit Product , 2017 .

[102]  Annemie Geeraerd,et al.  Qualitative assessment of eco-labels on fresh produce in Flanders (Belgium) highlights a potential intention-performance gap for the supply chain , 2017 .

[103]  M. Fabinyi.  Sustainable seafood consumption in China , 2016 .

[104]  Bodo Steiner,et al.  How does consumer knowledge affect environmentally sustainable choices? Evidence from a cross-country latent class analysis of food labels , 2016, Appetite.

[105]  J. Brezet,et al.  GetGreen Vietnam: towards more sustainable behaviour among the urban middle class , 2016 .

[106]  I. Galarraga,et al.  Using food taxes and subsidies to achieve emission reduction targets in Norway , 2016 .

[107]  F. Akaichi,et al.  Does Fair Trade Compete with Carbon Footprint and Organic Attributes in the Eyes of Consumers? Results from a Pilot Study in Scotland, The Netherlands and France , 2016 .

[108]  Bodo Steiner,et al.  Paying for sustainability: A cross-cultural analysis of consumers’ valuations of food and non-food products labeled for carbon and water footprints , 2016 .

[109]  K. Lacy,et al.  The importance of taste on dietary choice, behaviour and intake in a group of young adults , 2016, Appetite.

[110]  R. Nayga,et al.  Time preferences and food choices: Evidence from a choice experiment , 2016 .

[111]  Caroline M. Saunders,et al.  Emerging versus developed economy consumer willingness to pay for environmentally sustainable food production: a choice experiment approach comparing Indian, Chinese and United Kingdom lamb consumers , 2016 .

[112]  Shilpa S. Samant,et al.  Effects of label understanding level on consumers’ visual attention toward sustainability and process-related label claims found on chicken meat products , 2016 .

[113]  Erik Hunter,et al.  Exploring the relationship between nature sounds, connectedness to nature, mood and willingness to buy sustainable food: A retail field experiment , 2016, Appetite.

[114]  Shilpa S. Samant,et al.  Quality perception and acceptability of chicken breast meat labeled with sustainability claims vary as a function of consumers’ label-understanding level , 2016 .

[115]  L. Panzone,et al.  Media effects on sustainable food consumption. How newspaper coverage relates to supermarket expenditures , 2016 .

[116]  Shilpa S. Samant,et al.  The effect of varying educational intervention on consumers’ understanding and attitude toward sustainability and process-related labels found on chicken meat products , 2016 .

[117]  Bert Weijters,et al.  The negative footprint illusion: Perceptual bias in sustainable food consumption , 2016 .

[118]  Exploring the impacts of food label format on consumer willingness to pay for environmental sustainability : A choice experiment approach in the United Kingdom and Japan , 2016 .

[119]  Katarina Elofsson,et al.  The impact of climate information on milk demand: Evidence from a field experiment , 2016 .

[120]  Matthias Lehner.  Retail store influence on sustainable consumption behaviour , 2015 .

[121]  Davide Menozzi,et al.  Consumer attitude towards sustainable-labelled wine: an exploratory approach , 2015 .

[122]  M. Vandenbergh,et al.  Predicting consumer demand responses to carbon labels , 2015 .

[123]  R. Vecchio,et al.  Consumers' literacy and preferences for sustainability labels: an exploratory analysis on Italian young adults , 2015 .

[124]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes , 2015 .

[125]  S. Rousseau.  The role of organic and fair trade labels when choosing chocolate , 2015 .

[126]  G. Greene,et al.  The Green Eating Project: web-based intervention to promote environmentally conscious eating behaviours in US university students , 2015, Public Health Nutrition.

[127]  T. Giudice,et al.  The Effect of Information on Willingness to Pay for Canned Tuna Fish with Different Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Certification: A Pilot Study , 2015 .

[128]  H. Tjärnemo,et al.  Swedish food retailers promoting climate smarter food choices—Trapped between visions and reality? , 2015 .

[129]  N. Avena,et al.  Which Foods May Be Addictive? The Roles of Processing, Fat Content, and Glycemic Load , 2015, PloS one.

[130]  R. Vecchio,et al.  Willingness-to-pay for sustainability-labelled chocolate: an experimental auction approach , 2015 .

[131]  V. Nichèle,et al.  Taxing animal-based foods for sustainability: environmental, nutritional and social perspectives in France , 2016 .

[132]  J. Lusk,et al.  Elicitation formats and the WTA/WTP gap: A study of climate neutral foods , 2016 .

[133]  S. Downs,et al.  ‘Sustainability does not quite get the attention it deserves’: synergies and tensions in the sustainability frames of Australian food policy actors , 2014, Public Health Nutrition.

[134]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat , 2014 .

[135]  Liesbet Vranken,et al.  Food Labeling and Eco-Friendly Consumption: Experimental Evidence From a Belgian Supermarket , 2014 .

[136]  D. Tilman,et al.  Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health , 2014, Nature.

[137]  Erik Hunter,et al.  Communicating GHG mitigating food consumption in-store: An observational study of food retailers in five European countries , 2014 .

[138]  C. Valor,et al.  The Influence of Knowledge and Motivation on Sustainable Label Use , 2014 .

[139]  Víctor H. Moreira,et al.  Willingness to pay for carbon footprint on foods , 2014 .

[140]  Hannele Pulkkinen,et al.  Finnish consumer perceptions of carbon footprints and carbon labelling of food products , 2014 .

[141]  J. Buckley,et al.  Are the Dietary Guidelines for Meat, Fat, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Appropriate for Environmental Sustainability? A Review of the Literature , 2014, Nutrients.

[142]  J. Boer,et al.  “Meatless days” or “less but better”? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges , 2014, Appetite.

[143]  Wen-Bin Chiou,et al.  Fueling Green Dining Intention: The Self-Completion Theory Perspective , 2014 .

[144]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Climate policy through changing consumption choices: Options and obstacles for reducing greenhouse gas emissions , 2014 .

[145]  R. Vecchio,et al.  Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: an exploratory study on Italian consumers , 2014 .

[146]  K. Grunert,et al.  Sustainability Labels on Food Products: Consumer Motivation, Understanding and Use , 2014 .

[147]  Erin Redman,et al.  Transforming sustainable food and waste behaviors by realigning domains of knowledge in our education system , 2014 .

[148]  R. Vecchio.  Determinants of willingness-to-pay for sustainable wine: Evidence from experimental auctions , 2013 .

[149]  J. Dixon,et al.  Why sustainable and ‘nutritionally correct’ food is not on the agenda: Western Sydney, the moral arts of everyday life and public policy , 2013 .

[150]  L. Zepeda,et al.  A conceptual framework for analyzing consumers' food label preferences: An exploratory study of sustainability labels in France, Quebec, Spain and the US , 2013 .

[151]  F. Bogner,et al.  The influence of situational emotions on the intention for sustainable consumer behaviour in a student-centred intervention , 2013 .

[152]  G. Spaargaren,et al.  Consumer Responses to the Carbon Labelling of Food: A Real Life Experiment in a Canteen Practice , 2013 .

[153]  R. Nayga,et al.  Food Miles or Carbon Emissions? Exploring Labelling Preference for Food Transport Footprint with a Stated Choice Study , 2013 .

[154]  Eija Pouta,et al.  The impact of fat content, production methods and carbon footprint information on consumer preferences for minced meat , 2013 .

[155]  M. Suhrcke,et al.  Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[156]  L. Reisch,et al.  Sustainable food consumption: an overview of contemporary issues and policies , 2013 .

[157]  T. Schmit,et al.  Consumer Valuation of Environmentally Friendly Production Practices in Wines, considering Asymmetric Information and Sensory Effects , 2013 .

[158]  S. Smed,et al.  The effect of using consumption taxes on foods to promote climate friendly diets – The case of Denmark , 2013 .

[159]  L. Zepeda,et al.  Consumers' perceptions of individual and combined sustainable food labels: a UK pilot investigation , 2013 .

[160]  G. Böhm,et al.  Promoting purchases of sustainable groceries: An intervention study , 2013 .

[161]  J. Boer,et al.  Climate change and meat eating: An inconvenient couple? , 2013 .

[162]  H. Skouteris,et al.  ‘It's all about Ben10™’: children's play, health and sustainability decisions in the early years , 2013 .

[163]  Françoise Bartiaux,et al.  Are there domino effects between consumers' ordinary and ‘green’ practices? An analysis of quantitative data from a sensitisation campaign on personal carbon footprint , 2012 .

[164]  C. Saunders,et al.  Carbon labeling and consumer attitudes , 2012 .

[165]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers' willingness to act and to support policy measures , 2012 .

[166]  Yanfeng Zhou,et al.  Chinese consumers’ adoption of a ‘green’ innovation – The case of organic food , 2012 .

[167]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  Endorsing Sustainable Food Consumption: Prospects from Public Catering , 2012 .

[168]  R. Nayga,et al.  Consumers' valuation of food quality labels: The case of the European geographic indication and organic farming labels , 2012 .

[169]  C. Durham,et al.  Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization Picking Apples : Can Multi-Attribute Ecolabels Compete ? , 2012 .

[170]  David Oglethorpe,et al.  The use and usefulness of carbon labelling food: A policy perspective from a survey of UK supermarket shoppers , 2011 .

[171]  Rachel Dodds,et al.  Potential for sustainability eco‐labeling in Ontario's wine industry , 2011 .

[172]  T. Swanson,et al.  Testing for the Best Instrument to Generate Sustainable Food Consumption , 2011 .

[173]  Wilma E Waterlander,et al.  Consumer food choices: the role of price and pricing strategies , 2011, Public Health Nutrition.

[174]  R. Nayga,et al.  Welfare Effects of Food Miles Labels , 2013 .

[175]  David K. Holdsworth,et al.  Food miles: Do UK consumers actually care? , 2010 .

[176]  Masako Okamoto,et al.  Interactive effects of carbon footprint information and its accessibility on value and subjective qualities of food products , 2010, Appetite.

[177]  Patricia Allen,et al.  Beyond Organic and Fair Trade? An Analysis of Ecolabel Preferences in the United States , 2010 .

[178]  John Barrett,et al.  Distributional effects of climate change taxation: the case of the UK. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[179]  Roland W Scholz,et al.  Toward a Sustainability Label for Food Products: An Analysis of Experts' and Consumers' Acceptance , 2010, Ecology of food and nutrition.

[180]  Tim Lang,et al.  Reshaping the Food System for Ecological Public Health , 2009, Journal of hunger & environmental nutrition.

[181]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[182]  Paul T. M. Ingenbleek,et al.  Do “good” food products make others look “bad”?: Spin‐off effects of labels for sustainable food production in the consumer perception , 2008 .

[183]  I. Vermeir,et al.  Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values , 2008 .

[184]  P. Todd,et al.  Fast and frugal food choices: Uncovering individual decision heuristics , 2007, Appetite.

[185]  Jane M. F. Johnson,et al.  Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. , 2007, Environmental pollution.

[186]  Joop de Boer,et al.  Food and sustainability: Do consumers recognize, understand and value on-package information on production standards? , 2007, Appetite.

[187]  G. Grankvist,et al.  Predictors of purchase of eco-labelled food products : A panel study , 2007 .

[188]  G. Grankvist,et al.  Values and eco‐ and fair‐trade labelled products , 2007 .

[189]  M. Loureiro,et al.  Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience? , 2005 .

[190]  Andreas Diekmann,et al.  Green and Greenback , 2003 .

[191]  R. Mittelhammer,et al.  Will Consumers Pay a Premium for Eco-labeled Apples? , 2002 .

[192]  H. Murray,et al.  Promotion of sustainably produced foods: Customer response in Minnesota grocery stores , 2002 .

[193]  W. Moon,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Environmental Practices: Implications for Eco-Labeling , 2002, Land Economics.

[194]  Jill J. McCluskey,et al.  Assessing Consumer Preferences For Organic, Eco-Labeled, And Regular Apples , 2001 .

[195]  Frank Asche,et al.  MEASURING CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR ECOLABELED SEAFOOD: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON , 2001 .

[196]  Brian Dollery,et al.  Market Failure, Government Failure, Leadership and Public Policy , 1997 .

[197]  T. Lang.  Food Policy , 1940, Nature.