Neighborhood income and individual education: effect on survival after myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of neighborhood-level income and individual-level education with post-myocardial infarction (MI) mortality in community patients. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS From November 1, 2002, through May 31, 2006, 705 (mean+/-SD age, 69+/-15 years; 44% women) residents of Olmsted County, MN, who experienced an MI meeting standardized criteria were prospectively enrolled and followed up. The neighborhood's median household income was estimated by census tract data; education was self-reported. Demographic and clinical variables were obtained from the medical records. RESULTS Living in a less affluent neighborhood and having a low educational level were both associated with older age and more comorbidity. During follow-up (median, 13 months), 155 patients died. Neighborhood income (hazard ratio [HR], 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-3.12; for lowest [median, $34,205] vs highest [median, $60,652] tertile) and individual education (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.47-3.32; for <12 vs >12 years) were independently associated with mortality risk. Adjustment for demographics and various post-MI prognostic indicators attenuated these estimates, yet excess risk persisted for low neighborhood income (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.08-2.45). Modeled as a continuous variable, each $10,000 increase in annual income was associated with a 10% reduction in mortality risk (adjusted HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99). CONCLUSION In this geographically defined cohort of patients with MI, low individual education and poor neighborhood income were associated with a worse clinical presentation. Poor neighborhood income was a powerful predictor of mortality even after controlling for a variety of potential confounding factors. These data confirm the socioeconomic disparities in health after MI.

[1]  P. Austin,et al.  Effects of socioeconomic status on access to invasive cardiac procedures and on mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  C. Torp‐Pedersen,et al.  Mortality after acute myocardial infarction according to income and education , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[3]  K. Pickett,et al.  Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[4]  A. Diez-Roux,et al.  Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[5]  B. Gersh,et al.  Race, sex, poverty, and the medical treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. , 2000, Circulation.

[6]  L. Melton,et al.  History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. , 1996, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[7]  P. Martikainen,et al.  Pathways between socioeconomic determinants of health , 2004, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[8]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Impact of medication therapy discontinuation on mortality after myocardial infarction. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  W. Hadden,et al.  The increasing disparity in mortality between socioeconomic groups in the United States, 1960 and 1986. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  F. Van de Werf,et al.  External validity of clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Effects of socioeconomic status on mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, The American journal of medicine.

[12]  B. Gersh,et al.  Socioeconomic status and outcome following acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  C. Viscoli,et al.  Functional Recovery after Myocardial Infarction in Men: The Independent Effects of Social Class , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  J. Killian,et al.  Participation bias assessment in a community-based study of myocardial infarction, 2002-2005. , 2007, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[15]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Long-Term Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction Is Lower in More Deprived Neighborhoods , 2005, Circulation.

[16]  D. Gray,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation: socially deprived patients are less likely to attend but patients ineligible for thrombolysis are less likely to be invited , 1999, Heart.

[17]  Fred S Apple,et al.  European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology guidelines for redefinition of myocardial infarction: how to use existing assays clinically and for clinical trials. , 2002, American heart journal.

[18]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[19]  L. Chambless,et al.  Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  L. Mosca,et al.  The association between educational level and risk of cardiovascular disease fatality among women with cardiovascular disease. , 2005, Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health.

[21]  J Bound,et al.  Use of census-based aggregate variables to proxy for socioeconomic group: evidence from national samples. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[22]  A. Timmis,et al.  Socioeconomic differentials in recurrent ischaemia and mortality after acute myocardial infarction , 2001, Heart.

[23]  P. Austin,et al.  Socioeconomic Status and Mortality after Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  A. P. de Leon,et al.  Neighborhood Socioeconomic Context, Individual Income and Myocardial Infarction , 2006, Epidemiology.

[25]  Jack V Tu,et al.  Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  J. Killian,et al.  Secular Trends in Deaths From Cardiovascular Diseases: A 25-Year Community Study , 2006, Circulation.

[27]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Relation of education to sudden death after myocardial infarction. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  W. Weaver,et al.  Socioeconomic Status Is an Important Determinant of the Use of Invasive Procedures After Acute Myocardial Infarction in New York State , 2000, Circulation.

[29]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Comparison of long-term outcome after acute myocardial infarction in patients never graduated from high school with that in more educated patients. Multicenter Investigation of the Limitation of Infarct Size (MILIS). , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[30]  J. Feinglass,et al.  Health Literacy and Mortality Among Elderly Persons , 2007 .

[31]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Poverty, process of care, and outcome in acute coronary syndromes. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction: Prospective Evaluation in the Community , 2006, Circulation.

[33]  M. Metzler,et al.  Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. , 2005, JAMA.

[34]  V. Salomaa,et al.  Relation of socioeconomic position to the case fatality, prognosis and treatment of myocardial infarction events; the FINMONICA MI Register Study , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[35]  P. Sorlie,et al.  Mortality Effects of Community Socioeconomic Status , 1997, Epidemiology.

[36]  Kristina Sundquist,et al.  Neighborhood socioeconomic environment and incidence of coronary heart disease: a follow-up study of 25,319 women and men in Sweden. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[37]  D. Black.  Inequalities in health : report / of a research working group , 1980 .

[38]  S. Robert.  SOCIOECONOMIC POSITION AND HEALTH: The Independent Contribution of Community Socioeconomic Context1 , 1999 .

[39]  S. Normand,et al.  Socioeconomic disparities in outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, American heart journal.

[40]  T. Wan,et al.  Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Disadvantaged Populations , 2001 .