Changing the Geography of Opportunity by Expanding Residential Choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux Program

Abstract The concept of “geography of opportunity” suggests that where individuals live affects their opportunities. While multivariate analyses cannot control completely for individual self‐selection to neighborhoods, this article examines a residential integration program—the Gautreaux program—in which low‐income blacks are randomly assigned to middle‐income white suburbs or low‐income mostly black urban areas. Compared with urban movers, adult suburban movers experience higher employment but no different wages or hours worked, and suburban mover youth do better on several educational measures and, if not in college, are more likely to have jobs with good pay and benefits. The two groups of youth are equally likely to interact with peers, but suburban movers are much more likely to interact with whites and only slightly less likely to interact with blacks. The article considers how attrition might affect the observations and speculates about the program's strengths and pitfalls.

[1]  George Galster,et al.  The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework , 1995 .

[2]  J. E. Kaufman,et al.  The Education and Employment of Low-Income Black Youth in White Suburbs , 1992 .

[3]  J. Kasarda.  Inner‐city concentrated poverty and neighborhood distress: 1970 to 1990 , 1993 .

[4]  Lawrence M. Mead,et al.  Beyond entitlement : the social obligations of citizenship , 1985 .

[5]  J. Rosenbaum,et al.  Low-Income Black Children in White Suburban Schools: A Study of School and Student Responses , 1987 .

[6]  S. Bianchi,et al.  Barriers to the Racial Integration of Neighborhoods: The Detroit Case , 1979 .

[7]  W. Wilson.  The truly disadvantaged : the inner city, the underclass, and public policy , 1988 .

[8]  Douglas S. Massey,et al.  Trends in the residential segregation of blacks Hispanics and Asians: 1970-1980. , 1987 .

[9]  James E. Rosenbaum.  Social implications of educational grouping , 1980 .

[10]  C. Davis,et al.  Gautreaux housing demonstration : an evaluation of its impact on participating households , 1979 .

[11]  J. Rosenbaum,et al.  White suburban schools' responses to low-income black children: Sources of successes and problems , 1988 .

[12]  O. Lewis.  The culture of poverty , 1963, Scientific American.

[13]  M. Patchen,et al.  Black White Contact in Schools: Its Social and Academic Effects , 1981 .

[14]  B. Berry.  The open housing question: Race and housing in Chicago, 1966-1976 , 1979 .

[15]  A. Mood,et al.  Equality of Educational Opportunity. , 1967 .

[16]  G. Orfield.  The Chicago Study of Access and Choice in Higher Education: A Report to the Illinois Senate Committee on Higher Education. , 1984 .

[17]  James E. Rosenbaum.  Chapter 8: Social Implications of Educational Grouping , 1980 .

[18]  James E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Employment and earnings of low-income blacks who move to middle-class suburbs , 1991 .

[19]  William H. Frey,et al.  Changes in the segregation of whites from blacks during the 1980s: small steps toward a more integrated society. , 1994 .

[20]  James E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Voluntary Racial Integration in a Magnet School , 1978, The School Review.

[21]  W. Hawley.  Effective School Desegregation: Equity, Quality, and Feasibility , 1981 .

[22]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Making Inequality: The Hidden Curriculum of High School Tracking. , 1978 .

[23]  Norman Miller,et al.  School Desegregation: A Long-Term Study. , 1975 .

[24]  H. Schuman,et al.  Survey-Based Experiments on White Racial Attitudes Toward Residential Integration , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  J. Oakes,et al.  Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. , 1986 .

[26]  Clarence N. Stone,et al.  Housing vouchers for the poor : lessons from a national experiment , 1982 .

[27]  Carl Simpson,et al.  School Desegregation: Outcomes for Children. , 1976 .