A game-theoretic analysis of the ESP game

“Games with a Purpose” are interactive games that users play because they are fun, with the added benefit that the outcome of play is useful work. The ESP game, developed byy von Ahn and Dabbish [2004], is an example of such a game devised to label images on the web. Since labeling images is a hard problem for computer vision algorithms and can be tedious and time-consuming for humans, the ESP game provides humans with incentive to do useful work by being enjoyable to play. We present a simple game-theoretic model of the ESP game and characterize the equilibrium behavior in our model. Our equilibrium analysis supports the fact that users appear to coordinate on low effort words. We provide an alternate model of user preferences, modeling a change that could be induced through a different scoring method, and show that equilibrium behavior in this model coordinates on high-effort words. We also give sufficient conditions for coordinating on high-effort words to be a Bayesian-Nash equilibrium. Our results suggest the possibility of formal incentive design in achieving desirable system-wide outcomes for the purpose of human computation, complementing existing considerations of robustness against cheating and human factors.

[1]  H. Levy,et al.  Efficiency analysis of choices involving risk , 1969 .

[2]  B. Moldovanu,et al.  The Optimal Allocation of Prizes in Contests , 2001 .

[3]  Manuel Blum,et al.  Peekaboom: a game for locating objects in images , 2006, CHI.

[4]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Rethinking the ESP game , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Crowdsourcing and knowledge sharing: strategic user behavior on taskcn , 2008, EC '08.

[6]  Arunava Sen,et al.  Ordinally Bayesian incentive compatible voting rules , 2004 .

[7]  Manuel Blum,et al.  Improving accessibility of the web with a computer game , 2006, CHI.

[8]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Designing incentives for online question and answer forums , 2009, EC '09.

[9]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Optimal Design of Crowdsourcing Contests , 2009, ICIS.

[10]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Designing games with a purpose , 2008, CACM.

[11]  Jane Yung-jen Hsu,et al.  KissKissBan: a competitive human computation game for image annotation , 2010, HCOMP '09.

[12]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Labeling images with a computer game , 2004, AAAI Spring Symposium: Knowledge Collection from Volunteer Contributors.

[13]  Ruggiero Cavallo,et al.  Efficient crowdsourcing contests , 2012, AAMAS.

[14]  Jane Yung-jen Hsu,et al.  The PhotoSlap Game: Play to Annotate , 2007, AAAI.

[15]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Questions in, knowledge in?: a study of naver's question answering community , 2009, CHI.

[16]  ConitzerVincent,et al.  The ACM transactions on economics and computation , 2013 .

[17]  Milan Vojnovic,et al.  Crowdsourcing and all-pay auctions , 2009, EC '09.

[18]  Patrick Hummel,et al.  A game-theoretic analysis of rank-order mechanisms for user-generated content , 2011, EC '11.

[19]  David A. Forsyth,et al.  Matching Words and Pictures , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[20]  Luis von Ahn,et al.  Matchin: eliciting user preferences with an online game , 2009, CHI.

[21]  Jane Yung-jen Hsu,et al.  PhotoSlap: A Multi-player Online Game for Semantic Annotation , 2007, AAAI.

[22]  Edith Law,et al.  Input-agreement: a new mechanism for collecting data using human computation games , 2009, CHI.

[23]  G. Zipf Selected Studies of the Principle of Relative Frequency in Language , 2014 .

[24]  Manuel Blum,et al.  Verbosity: a game for collecting common-sense facts , 2006, CHI.

[25]  Shuchi Chawla,et al.  Optimal crowdsourcing contests , 2012, SODA 2012.

[26]  Dipjyoti Majumdar,et al.  Ordinally Bayesian Incentive Compatible Stable Matching , 2003 .

[27]  Luis von Ahn Games with a Purpose , 2006, Computer.

[28]  Kuan-Ta Chen,et al.  On formal models for social verification , 2009, HCOMP '09.

[29]  C. d'Aspremont,et al.  Ordinal Bayesian incentive compatible representations of committees , 1988 .

[30]  R. Preston McAfee,et al.  Incentivizing high-quality user-generated content , 2011, WWW.

[31]  M. Kearns,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Coloring Problem on Human Subject Networks , 2006, Science.

[32]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[33]  C ParkesDavid,et al.  A game-theoretic analysis of the ESP game , 2013 .

[34]  Benny Moldovanu,et al.  Contest architecture , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[35]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something , 2008, WWW.