Metal artifact reduction techniques for single energy CT and dual-energy CT with various metal materials

Objective: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of reduction metal artifacts using kV-CT image with the single-energy based metal artefact reduction (SEMAR) technique by single-energy reconstruction, monochromatic CT and rED reconstructed by dual-energy reconstruction. Methods: Seven different metal materials (brass, aluminum, copper, stainless, steel, lead and titanium) were placed inside the water-based PMMA phantom. After DECT-based scan, the artefact index (AI) were evaluated with the kV-CT images with and without SEMAR by single-energy reconstruction, and raw-data based electron density (rED), monochromatic CT images by dual-energy reconstruction. Moreover, the AI with evaluated with rED and the converted ED images from the kV-CT and monochromatic CT images. Results: The minimum average value of the AI with all-metal inserts was approximately 80 keV. The AI without SEMAR was larger than that with SEMAR for the 80 kV and 135 kV CT images. In the comparison of the AI for the rED and ED images that were converted from 80 kV and 135 kV CT images with and without SEMAR, the monochromatic CT images of the PMMA phantom with inserted metal materials at 80 keV revealed that the kV-CT with SEMAR reduced the metal artefact substantially. Conclusion: The converted ED from the kV-CT and monochromatic CT images could be useful for a comparison of the AI using the same contrast scale. The kV-CT image with SEMAR by single-energy reconstruction was found to substantially reduce metal artefact. Advances in knowledge: The effectiveness of reduction of metal artifacts using single-energy based metal artefact reduction (SEMAR) technique and dual-energy CT (DECT) was evaluated the electron density conversion techniques.

[1]  Ernst Klotz,et al.  Stress myocardial perfusion: imaging with multidetector CT. , 2014, Radiology.

[2]  Dominik Fleischmann,et al.  Computed tomography—old ideas and new technology , 2011, European Radiology.

[3]  Eric J. Tkaczyk,et al.  Monochromatic CT image representation via fast switching dual kVp , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Val M Runge,et al.  Metal Artifact Reduction in Pelvic Computed Tomography With Hip Prostheses: Comparison of Virtual Monoenergetic Extrapolations From Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and an Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in a Phantom Study , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[5]  James C. Williams,et al.  Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[6]  Accuracy of the raw-data-based effective atomic numbers and monochromatic CT numbers for contrast medium with a dual-energy CT technique. , 2017, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  Sachio Kuribayashi,et al.  Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: improved image quality as compared with that obtained with conventional 120-kVp CT. , 2011, Radiology.

[8]  A. Macovski,et al.  Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[9]  Barbara Dobler,et al.  Influence of metallic dental implants and metal artefacts on dose calculation accuracy , 2015, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[10]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Impact of Single-Energy Metal Artifact Reduction on CT image quality in patients with dental hardware , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[11]  Fabian Bamberg,et al.  Metal Artifact Reduction by Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Using Energetic Extrapolation: A Systematically Optimized Protocol , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[12]  Sebastian Bickelhaupt,et al.  Reduction of metal artifacts from hip prostheses on CT images of the pelvis: value of iterative reconstructions. , 2013, Radiology.

[13]  Joon Koo Han,et al.  Usefulness of a metal artifact reduction algorithm for orthopedic implants in abdominal CT: phantom and clinical study results. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  S. Pan,et al.  Value and Clinical Application of Orthopedic Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in CT Scans after Orthopedic Metal Implantation , 2017, Korean journal of radiology.

[15]  Todd R McNutt,et al.  The impact of dental metal artifacts on head and neck IMRT dose distributions. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  Jin-Suck Suh,et al.  Metal artefact reduction in gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy CT with and without metal artefact reduction software , 2012, European Radiology.

[17]  S. Mori,et al.  Single-energy metal artefact reduction with CT for carbon-ion radiation therapy treatment planning. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  Francesco C Stingo,et al.  An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  P. Babyn,et al.  Metal Artifact Reduction: Added Value of Rapid-Kilovoltage-Switching Dual-Energy CT in Relation to Single-Energy CT in a Piglet Animal Model. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Julia F. Barrett,et al.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[21]  J. L. Lehr,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of a dual energy CT system. , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.