Negotiation as a Challenge Problem for Virtual Humans

We argue for the importance of negotiation as a challenge problem for virtual human research, and introduce a virtual conversational agent that allows people to practice a wide range of negotiation skills. We describe the multi-issue bargaining task, which has become a de facto standard for teaching and research on negotiation in both the social and computer sciences. This task is popular as it allows scientists or instructors to create a variety of distinct situations that arise in real-life negotiations, simply by manipulating a small number of mathematical parameters. We describe the development of a virtual human that will allow students to practice the interpersonal skills they need to recognize and navigate these situations. An evaluation of an early wizard-controlled version of the system demonstrates the promise of this technology for teaching negotiation and supporting scientific research on social intelligence.

[1]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  SmartBody: behavior realization for embodied conversational agents , 2008, AAMAS.

[2]  Haydn Jones,et al.  All together now , 1995 .

[3]  Rui Li,et al.  Predicting video-conferencing conversation outcomes based on modeling facial expression synchronization , 2015, 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG).

[4]  Jonathan Gratch,et al.  An Effective Conversation Tactic for Creating Value over Repeated Negotiations , 2015, AAMAS.

[5]  Koen V. Hindriks,et al.  Creating human-machine synergy in negotiation support systems: towards the pocket negotiator , 2008, HuCom.

[6]  Louis-Philippe Morency,et al.  Mutual Behaviors during Dyadic Negotiation: Automatic Prediction of Respondent Reactions , 2013, 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction.

[7]  Reid Hastie,et al.  Judgment tasks and biases in negotiation , 1990 .

[8]  Hal Movius,et al.  The Effectiveness of Negotiation Training , 2008 .

[9]  David DeVault,et al.  Toward Natural Turn-Taking in a Virtual Human Negotiation Agent , 2015, AAAI Spring Symposia.

[10]  P. Carnevale,et al.  A Nasty but Effective Negotiation Strategy: Misrepresentation of a Common-Value Issue , 1997 .

[11]  Gardner Murphy,et al.  Experimental social psychology. , 1934 .

[12]  J. Nash.  THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[13]  Paula J. Durlach,et al.  BiLAT: A Game-Based Environment for Practicing Negotiation in a Cultural Context , 2009, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[14]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Collaborative Plans for Complex Group Action , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Gerben A. van Kleef,et al.  The Interpersonal Effects of Anger and Happiness on Negotiation Behavior and Outcomes , 2003 .

[16]  Jonathan Gratch,et al.  The effect of expression of anger and happiness in computer agents on negotiations with humans , 2011, AAMAS.

[17]  Anton Leuski,et al.  All Together Now - Introducing the Virtual Human Toolkit , 2013, IVA.

[18]  H. Chad Lane,et al.  Teaching Negotiation Skills through Practice and Reflection with Virtual Humans , 2006, Simul..

[19]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[20]  Jonathan Gratch,et al.  Negotiation Strategies with Incongruent Facial Expressions of Emotion Cause Cardiovascular Threat , 2013 .

[21]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  What Do People Value When They Negotiate? Mapping the Domain of Subjective Value in Negotiation , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  Nonverbal Behavior Generator for Embodied Conversational Agents , 2006, IVA.

[23]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Virtual Reality Negotiation Training Increases Negotiation Knowledge and Skill , 2012, IVA.

[24]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Evaluating practical negotiating agents: Results and analysis of the 2011 international competition , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[25]  O’Connor,et al.  Groups and Solos in Context: The Effects of Accountability on Team Negotiation. , 1997, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[26]  Jonathan Gratch,et al.  Opponent Modeling for Virtual Human Negotiators , 2015, IVA.

[27]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Investigating the benefits of automated negotiations in enhancing people's negotiation skills , 2009, AAMAS.

[28]  David R. Traum,et al.  Multi-party, Multi-issue, Multi-strategy Negotiation for Multi-modal Virtual Agents , 2008, IVA.

[29]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[30]  David DeVault,et al.  Incremental interpretation and prediction of utterance meaning for interactive dialogue , 2011, Dialogue Discourse.

[31]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  NEGOTIATION AND MEDIATION , 1992 .

[32]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neural signatures of strategic types in a two-person bargaining game , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Avi Rosenfeld,et al.  NegoChat: a chat-based negotiation agent , 2014, AAMAS.

[34]  J. Mills,et al.  Experimental social psychology , 1972 .

[35]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Sacred values and conflict over Iran’s nuclear program , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.