In this work, the values of decentralized (onsite) systems that avoid investments in idle capacity within wastewater plans are quantitatively justified using the specific net present value (SNPV) approach. SNPV is a currently proposed criterion in environmental engineering economics that is defined as the net present value of the cost per unit of service or per population equivalent (PE). The SNPV approach was reintroduced with bugs fixed and then applied to the economic analysis of the capital and operating costs of one-stage completed central plants, stage-expanded central plants, and decentralized treatment facilities. The results show that under a demand growth scenario, the central plant will inevitably reach idle capacity, which can be reduced by a staged expansion. However, the staged expansion plan will lose the economies of scale and, hence, is only viable under projections of a low or moderate price inflation rate or high demand growth rate. Onsite treatment systems can theoretically achieve 100% utilization. Assuming that the capital costs per PE of the onsite and central systems are equal, the former is economically favorable in most cases of price inflation as a result of its cost saving on idle capacity. Onsite treatment systems can be viable even though their capital expenditures per PE are higher than that of a comparable centralized option as to a capital investment. This finding suggests wide opening of onsite technology choices. Use of the SNPV showed that average operating expenses of centralized plants decrease as demand growth rates increase as a benefit of economies of scale, whereas those of onsite treatment systems depend only on price inflation. Semi-decentralized systems feature both the financial advantage of the onsite system (capital investment) and the superiority of centralized systems (operation and maintenance); thus, it is worth consideration. The results of this study illustrate not only the value of decentralized systems but also the value of the SNPV approach in the planning of wastewater services, especially in areas undergoing high demand growth.
[1]
Jeonghwan Kim,et al.
Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer--can this be achieved?
,
2011,
Environmental science & technology.
[2]
M Maurer,et al.
Specific net present value: an improved method for assessing modularisation costs in water services with growing demand.
,
2009,
Water research.
[3]
Donald G. Newnan.
Engineering Economic Analysis
,
2017
.
[4]
Frank Crundwell,et al.
Finance for Engineers: Evaluation and Funding of Capital Projects
,
2008
.
[5]
P A Wilderer.
Sustainable water management in rural and peri-urban areas: what technology do we need to meet the UN millennium development goals?
,
2005,
Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.
[6]
Ousmane Sow,et al.
Capital and Operating Costs of Full-Scale Fecal Sludge Management and Wastewater Treatment Systems in Dakar, Senegal
,
2012,
Environmental science & technology.
[7]
May A. Massoud,et al.
Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries.
,
2009,
Journal of environmental management.
[8]
J. S. Dajani,et al.
ON THE CENTRALIZATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES1
,
1972
.
[9]
Milton Friedman,et al.
Inflation: Causes and Consequences
,
1963
.
[10]
M. Maurer,et al.
Source separation: will we see a paradigm shift in wastewater handling?
,
2009,
Environmental science & technology.
[11]
Peter A. Wilderer,et al.
Decentralized and centralized wastewater management: a challenge for technology developers
,
2000
.