At first sight: A high-level pop out effect for faces

To determine the nature of face perception, several studies used the visual search paradigm, whereby subjects detect an odd target among distractors. When detection reaction time is set-size independent, the odd element is said to "pop out", reflecting a basic mechanism or map for the relevant feature. A number of previous studies suggested that schematic faces do not pop out. We show that natural face stimuli do pop out among assorted non-face objects. Animal faces, on the other hand, do not pop out from among the same assorted non-face objects. In addition, search for a face among distractors of another object category is easier than the reverse search, and face search is mediated by holistic face characteristics, rather than by face parts. Our results indicate that the association of pop out with elementary features and lower cortical areas may be incorrect. Instead, face search, and indeed all feature search, may reflect high-level activity with generalization over spatial and other property details.

[1]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Eccentricity Bias as an Organizing Principle for Human High-Order Object Areas , 2002, Neuron.

[2]  P Jolicoeur,et al.  Impact of Quality of the Image, Orientation, and Similarity of the Stimuli on Visual Search for Faces , 1994, Perception.

[3]  N. Kanwisher.  Faces and places: of central (and peripheral) interest , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  R. A. Haaf,et al.  A facial dimension in visual discrimination by human infants. , 1967, Child development.

[5]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[7]  B. Julesz,et al.  Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences. , 1987, Spatial vision.

[8]  S. Dakin.  Orientation variance as a quantifier of structure in texture. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[9]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  D. Purcell,et al.  It Takes a Confounded Face to Pop Out of a Crowd , 1996, Perception.

[11]  D. Perrett,et al.  Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Feature asymmetries in visual search: Effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency , 1998, Vision Research.

[13]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area , 1998, Cognition.

[14]  S. Bentin,et al.  Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces , 2002, Cognition.

[15]  A. Treisman.  Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  A. Treisman.  Preattentive processing in vision , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[18]  Bonnie L. Angelone,et al.  Visual search for a socially defined feature: What causes the search asymmetry favoring cross-race faces? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  T. Hendler,et al.  A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  J. Keenan,et al.  Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia , 2002, Neurology.

[21]  D. Levine,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A defect in visual configural processing , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[22]  M. Tovée,et al.  The responses of neurons in the temporal cortex of primates, and face identification and detection , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[24]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Features and objects in visual processing , 1986 .

[28]  J. Findlay,et al.  Face Detection in Peripheral Vision: Do Faces Pop Out? , 1997, Perception.

[29]  A. Reeves,et al.  The roles of distractor noise and target certainty in search: A signal detection model , 2004, Vision Research.

[30]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.

[31]  H. Nothdurft.  Faces and Facial Expressions do not Pop Out , 1993, Perception.

[32]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[33]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  On the perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[36]  Pattern and space perception in young infants. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[37]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. , 1991, Psychological review.

[38]  B. Julesz.  A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  E. Warrington,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Facial Recognition in Patients with Unilateral Cerebral Lesions , 1967 .

[40]  G. Rousselet,et al.  Is it an animal? Is it a human face? Fast processing in upright and inverted natural scenes. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[41]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  N. Hammond.  The Emergence of Maya Civilization , 1986 .

[43]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Representation of Objects in the Human Occipital and Temporal Cortex , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  M J Farah,et al.  Second-order relational properties and the inversion effect: Testing a theory of face perception , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  M. Tarr,et al.  FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.