Generation and nonclassicality of entangled states via the interaction of two three-level atoms with a quantized cavity field assisted by a driving external classical field

The interaction of two identical three-level atoms of the types $$V,\,\varXi $$V,Ξ and $$\varLambda $$Λ with a quantized cavity field as well as a driving external classical field is studied. Under two certain unitary transformations, the system is converted to a typical form of the Jaynes–Cummings model for two three-level atoms. The exact analytical solutions of the wave function for different considered atom–field systems are exactly obtained with the help of the Laplace transform technique, when the atoms are initially prepared in the topmost excited state and the quantized field is in a coherent state. In order to examine the nonclassicality features of the deduced states, the dynamics of the entanglement between subsystems is discussed via two well-known measures, namely, von Neumann entropy of the reduced state and negativity. In addition, we pay attention to the temporal behavior of quantum statistics of the photons of the field and squeezing phenomenon. Meanwhile, the influence of the external classical field on the latter physical quantities is analyzed in detail. The results show that the mentioned quantities can be sensitively controlled via the external classical field. Also, numerical computations imply the fact that the nonclassicality features in $$\varXi $$Ξ-type three-level atomic system is more visible than the other two configurations. In addition, it is shown that in the particular case of $$\varLambda $$Λ-type atomic system, the rank of the reduced density matrix of the three-level atoms is no larger than three, so that negativity fully captures the entanglement of this system and that such entanglement is distillable.

[1]  Measurable bounds for entanglement of formation , 2010 .

[2]  M. S. Zubairy,et al.  Quantum optics: Dedication , 1997 .

[3]  Zeilinger,et al.  Violations of local realism by two entangled N-dimensional systems are stronger than for two qubits , 2000, Physical review letters.

[4]  A. Behjat,et al.  Dynamics of Entropy and Nonclassicality Features of the Interaction between a ⋄-type Four-Level Atom and a Single-Mode Field in the Presence of Intensity-Dependent Coupling and Kerr Nonlinearity , 2014, 1408.2968.

[5]  H Bechmann-Pasquinucci,et al.  Quantum cryptography with 3-state systems. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[6]  G. Tóth,et al.  Entanglement detection , 2008, 0811.2803.

[7]  P. M. Echternach,et al.  Nanomechanical measurements of a superconducting qubit , 2009, Nature.

[8]  C. P. Sun,et al.  Scalable superconducting qubit circuits using dressed states , 2006, cond-mat/0606178.

[9]  Agarwal,et al.  Nonclassical character of states exhibiting no squeezing or sub-Poissonian statistics. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[10]  Pérès Separability Criterion for Density Matrices. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[11]  D. Bruß,et al.  Optimal eavesdropping in cryptography with three-dimensional quantum states. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[12]  B. Shore,et al.  Coherent population transfer among quantum states of atoms and molecules , 1998 .

[13]  Carmichael,et al.  Dynamic Stark effect for the Jaynes-Cummings system. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[14]  Chi-Hang Lam,et al.  Superconducting charge qubits : the roles of self and mutual inductances , 2001 .

[15]  Hosny Ammar Hessian,et al.  Entanglement and purity loss for the system of two 2-level atoms in the presence of the Stark shift , 2011, Quantum Inf. Process..

[16]  H. Walther,et al.  Preparing pure photon number states of the radiation field , 2000, Nature.

[17]  N. D. Mermin,et al.  Bell Inequalities with a Range of Violation that Does Not Diminish as the Spin Becomes Arbitrarily Large , 1982 .

[18]  Elliott H. Lieb,et al.  Extended Quantum Conditional Entropy and Quantum Uncertainty Inequalities , 2012, 1204.0825.

[19]  Franco Nori,et al.  Scalable quantum computing with Josephson charge qubits. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[20]  Cook,et al.  Possibility of direct observation of quantum jumps. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[21]  Peter L. Knight,et al.  Fluctuations and entropy in models of quantum optical resonance , 1988 .

[22]  Kuklinski,et al.  Strong squeezing in the Jaynes-Cummings model. , 1988, Physical review. A, General physics.

[23]  Weinfurter,et al.  Quantum cryptography with entangled photons , 1999, Physical review letters.

[24]  Gavrielides,et al.  Degenerate quantum-beat laser: Lasing without inversion and inversion without lasing. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[25]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  Quantum Entanglement , 2020, Quantum Mechanics.

[26]  Strongly driven one-atom laser and decoherence monitoring , 2007, quant-ph/0702054.

[27]  D. Walls,et al.  Squeezed states of the electromagnetic field: Introduction to feature issue , 1987 .

[28]  G. Vidal,et al.  Computable measure of entanglement , 2001, quant-ph/0102117.

[29]  Combining Jaynes-Cummings and anti-Jaynes-Cummings dynamics in a trapped-ion system driven by a laser , 2005 .

[30]  R. Loudon Quantum Statistics of Linear and Nonlinear Optical Phenomena , 1984 .

[31]  N. D. Mermin,et al.  Quantum mechanics vs local realism near the classical limit: A Bell inequality for spin s , 1980 .

[32]  M. Hatami,et al.  Dynamics of entanglement of a three-level atom in motion interacting with two coupled modes including parametric down conversion , 2014, 1407.7851.

[33]  Barnett,et al.  Information theory, squeezing, and quantum correlations. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[34]  Mohammad Kazem Tavassoly,et al.  Generation of some entangled states of the cavity field , 2015, Quantum Inf. Process..

[35]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit , 2004, Science.

[36]  Harris,et al.  Observation of electromagnetically induced transparency. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[37]  Blatt,et al.  Laser cooling of trapped three-level ions: Designing two-level systems for sideband cooling. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[38]  M. R. Hooshmandasl,et al.  Entanglement dynamics and position-momentum entropic uncertainty relation of a Λ-type three-level atom interacting with a two-mode cavity field in the presence of nonlinearities , 2013, 1303.4106.

[39]  E. Sudarshan,et al.  Time evolution of unstable quantum states and a resolution of Zeno's paradox , 1977 .

[40]  R. Zait Nonclassical statistical properties of a three-level atom interacting with a single-mode field in a Kerr medium with intensity dependent coupling , 2003 .

[41]  Satyabrata Adhikari,et al.  Entanglement witness operator for quantum teleportation. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[42]  M. Horodecki,et al.  Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions , 1996, quant-ph/9605038.

[43]  G. Vidal,et al.  Operational criterion and constructive checks for the separability of low-rank density matrices , 2000, quant-ph/0002089.

[44]  F. W. Cummings,et al.  Stimulated Emission of Radiation in a Single Mode , 1965 .

[45]  Y. Makhlin,et al.  Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices , 2000, cond-mat/0011269.

[46]  Simón Peres-horodecki separability criterion for continuous variable systems , 1999, Physical review letters.

[47]  M. Hillery Squeezing of the square of the field amplitude in second harmonic generation , 1987 .

[48]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  Volume of the set of separable states , 1998, quant-ph/9804024.

[49]  B. Buck,et al.  Solution of the Heisenberg equations for an atom interacting with radiation , 1984 .

[50]  M. Tavassoly,et al.  Tripartite entanglement dynamics and entropic squeezing of a three-level atom interacting with a bimodal cavity field , 2014, 1407.7716.

[51]  K. Jacobs,et al.  Statistical Inference, Distinguishability of Quantum States, And Quantum Entanglement , 1997, quant-ph/9703025.

[52]  Knight,et al.  Properties of displaced number states. , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[53]  C. Gardiner,et al.  Squeezing of intracavity and traveling-wave light fields produced in parametric amplification , 1984 .

[54]  Gilles Nogues,et al.  Coherent Operation of a Tunable Quantum Phase Gate in Cavity QED , 1999 .

[55]  B. Buck,et al.  Exactly soluble model of atom-phonon coupling showing periodic decay and revival , 1981 .

[56]  J. Siewert,et al.  Negativity as an estimator of entanglement dimension. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[57]  L. Mandel,et al.  Sub-Poissonian photon statistics in resonance fluorescence. , 1979, Optics letters.

[58]  N. Bohr II - Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[59]  Ardehali Hidden variables and quantum-mechanical probabilities for generalized spin-s systems. , 1991, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[60]  M. Tavassoly,et al.  Number-phase entropic squeezing and nonclassical properties of a three-level atom interacting with a two-mode field: intensity-dependent coupling, deformed Kerr medium, and detuning effects , 2013, 1407.7109.

[61]  Elliott H. Lieb,et al.  Entropy inequalities , 1970 .

[62]  W. Wootters Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits , 1997, quant-ph/9709029.

[63]  H. Baghshahi,et al.  Entanglement, quantum statistics and squeezing of two Ξ-type three-level atoms interacting nonlinearly with a single-mode field , 2014, 1408.2965.

[64]  C. H. Bennett,et al.  Quantum Information and Computation , 1995 .

[65]  G. Agarwal,et al.  Strong-driving-assisted multipartite entanglement in cavity QED. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[66]  Andrew D Greentree,et al.  Maximizing the Hilbert space for a finite number of distinguishable quantum states. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[67]  Timothy C. Ralph,et al.  A Guide to Experiments in Quantum Optics, 2nd, Revised and Enlarged Edition , 2004 .

[68]  S. J. Akhtarshenas,et al.  Entanglement dynamics and decoherence of an atom coupled to a dissipative cavity field , 2010, 1003.2706.

[69]  M. Wolf,et al.  Bound entangled Gaussian states. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[70]  Hood,et al.  Measurement of conditional phase shifts for quantum logic. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[71]  J. Eberly,et al.  Theory of Spontaneous-Emission Line Shape in an Ideal Cavity , 1983 .

[72]  P. Mahapatra,et al.  Electromagnetically induced grating in a three-level Ξ-type system driven by a strong standing wave pump and weak probe fields , 2006 .

[73]  A. Behjat,et al.  Entropy squeezing and atomic inversion in the k-photon Jaynes—Cummings model in the presence of the Stark shift and a Kerr medium: A full nonlinear approach , 2014, 1408.2975.

[74]  M. S. Abdalla,et al.  Dynamics of an atom coupled through a parametric frequency converter with quantum and classical fields , 2010 .

[75]  E. Jaynes,et al.  Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser , 1962 .

[76]  A. Obada,et al.  Collapse-revival phenomenon for different configurations of a three-level atom interacting with a field via multi-photon process and nonlinearities , 2014 .

[77]  M. Tavassoly,et al.  Dynamics of entropy and nonclassical properties of the state of a Λ-type three-level atom interacting with a single-mode cavity field with intensity-dependent coupling in a Kerr medium , 2012, 1204.2675.

[78]  F. Nori,et al.  Superconducting Circuits and Quantum Information , 2005, quant-ph/0601121.

[79]  Zhengang Shi,et al.  Scheme for n phase gates operation and one-step preparation of highly entangled cluster state , 2012 .

[80]  K. Schwab,et al.  Quantum measurement of a coupled nanomechanical resonator–Cooper-pair box system , 2003, cond-mat/0301252.

[81]  M. Kafatos Bell's theorem, quantum theory and conceptions of the universe , 1989 .

[82]  E. Schrödinger Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[83]  Franco Nori,et al.  Controllable coupling between flux qubits. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[84]  Ashraf Emission spectra of a Lambda -type quantum-beat three-level atom. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[85]  Atoms versus photons as carriers of quantum states , 2012, 1210.4298.

[86]  M. Tavassoly,et al.  Quantum entanglement and position–momentum entropic squeezing of a moving Lambda-type three-level atom interacting with a single-mode quantized field with intensity-dependent coupling , 2013, 1407.7690.

[87]  William K. Wootters,et al.  Entanglement of formation and concurrence , 2001, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[88]  P. Knight,et al.  The Jaynes-Cummings Model , 1993 .

[89]  G. Bjork,et al.  Entanglement invariant for the double Jaynes-Cummings model , 2007, 0706.3813.

[90]  M. S. Zubairy,et al.  Quantum optics: Frontmatter , 1997 .

[91]  L. Childs A concrete introduction to higher algebra , 1978 .

[92]  A. Obada,et al.  Entanglement of a multi-photon three-level atom interacting with a single-mode field in the presence of nonlinearities , 2012 .

[93]  Erik Lucero,et al.  Emulation of a Quantum Spin with a Superconducting Phase Qudit , 2009, Science.