The comparative efficacy of 2D- versus 3D-based media design for influencing spatial visualization skills

This study explored the effects of 2D- versus 3D-based media representations on the influence of the spatial visualization ability of undergraduate science majors. A pre-test/post-test comparison-group experiment was conducted with 23 participants involved in the study. Participating students were randomly assigned either to the interactive 3D media representation group (n=13) or the conventional 2D media representation group (n=10); learning materials in both groups deliver the same information to students, but employ different media representations. All the activities were performed in a self-paced, web-based instructional system. The results of ANCOVA analysis showed statistically insignificant difference between groups in terms of students' post-test scores on the spatial visualization ability test with the students' pre-test scores as the covariate. However, a medium effect size was observed in favor of the 3D group in terms of practical significance. As a pilot study with a small sample size aiming to probe the research direction of this problem, the result of medium-sized effect magnitude is likely to implicate that the discrepancy of different representational design on students' performance of spatial ability assessment is noteworthy. Future study of this nature appears to merit further replications and investigations.

[1]  R. Mayer,et al.  Three Facets of Visual and Verbal Learners: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Style, and Learning Preference. , 2003 .

[2]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[3]  Guey-Fa Chiou,et al.  An empirical exploration of using Wiki in an English as a second language course , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05).

[4]  Larry G. Daniel,et al.  Statistical Significance Testing: A Historical Overview of Misuse and Misinterpretation with Implications for the Editorial Policies of Educational Journals , 1998 .

[5]  Chun-Yen Chang,et al.  Adaptive presentation for effective Web-based learning of 3D content , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings..

[6]  N. Cole.  Conceptions of Educational Achievement , 1990 .

[7]  R Eyal,et al.  Spatial ability and learning the use of an angled laparoscope in a virtual environment. , 2001, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[8]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Confounding in Educational Computing Research , 1985 .

[9]  S. Olkun.  Making connections: improving spatial abilities with engineering drawing activities , 2003 .

[10]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Distinguishing Qualitatively Different Kinds of Learning Using Log Files and Learning Curves , 2005 .

[11]  Donald L. Fisher,et al.  Tutoring 3-dimensional visual skills: Dynamic adaptation to cognitive level , 2003 .

[12]  Susanne P. Lajoie.  Individual Differences in Spatial Ability: Developing Technologies to Increase Strategy Awareness and Skills , 2003, Educational Psychologist.

[13]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[14]  Oh Nam Kwon.  Fostering Spatial Visualization Ability through Web-Based Virtual-Reality Program and Paper-Based Program , 2003, Human.Society@Internet 2003.

[15]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  WHAT IS NEXT IN THE MEDIA AND METHODS DEBATE , 2003 .

[16]  Tun Hussein,et al.  Effect of Instructions on Spatial Visualisation Ability in Civil Engineering Students , 2002 .

[17]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[18]  Chun-Yen Chang,et al.  A web-based tutoring system with styles-matching strategy for spatial geometric transformation , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[19]  R. Kozma.  Learning with Media , 1991 .

[20]  Chun-Yen Chang,et al.  Teaching earth sciences: Should we implement teacher-directed or student-controlled CAI in the secondary classroom? , 2003 .

[21]  Charles Potter,et al.  SPATIAL ABILITY, VISUAL IMAGERY AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN ENGINEERING GRAPHICS , 2001 .

[22]  GEORGE M. BODNER,et al.  The Purdue Visualization of Rotations Test , 1997 .

[23]  E. Pellicer.  Anchored Instruction and Its Relationship to Situated Cognition , 1990 .

[24]  Patti Koenig Koehler.  FastScript3D: a JavaScript companion to Java3D , 2003, SIGGRAPH '03.

[25]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[26]  Patrick E. Connolly,et al.  The Addition Of Coordinate Axes To The Purdue Spatial Visualization Test Visualization Of Rotations: A Study At Two Universities , 1999 .

[27]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Reassessing Aptitude: Introduction to a Special Issue in Honor of Richard E. Snow , 2003, Educational Psychologist.

[28]  Hasmik Mehranian,et al.  Evaluating the Feasibility of Learning Student Models from Data , 2005 .

[29]  Kinshuk,et al.  Designing multimedia support for situated learning , 2003, Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies.

[30]  Lawrence J. Najjar.  Multimedia information and learning , 1996 .

[31]  Thomas Huk,et al.  The Influence Of Visual Spatial Ability On The Attitude of Users Towards High-Quality 3D-animations In Hypermedia Learning Environments , 2003 .

[32]  R. Clark.  Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[33]  Chun-Yen Chang,et al.  The Impact of Different Forms of Multimedia CAI on Students' Science Achievement , 2002 .

[34]  A. Paivio.  Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[35]  James E. McLean,et al.  The Role of Statistical Significance Testing In Educational Research , 1998 .

[36]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .