Connecting Science and Mathematics: The Nature of Proof and Disproof in Science and Mathematics

Disagreements exist among textbook authors, curriculum developers, and even among science and mathematics educators/researchers regarding the meanings and roles of several key nature-of-science (NOS) and nature-of-mathematics (NOM) terms such as proof, disproof, hypotheses, predictions, theories, laws, conjectures, axioms, theorems, and postulates. To assess the extent to which these disagreements may exist among high school science and mathematics teachers, a 14-item survey of the meanings and roles of the above terms was constructed and administered to a sample of science and mathematics teachers. As expected, the science teachers performed better than the mathematics teachers on the NOS items (44.1 versus 24.7%, respectively) and the mathematics teachers performed better than the science teachers on the NOM items (59.0 versus 26.1%, respectively). Nevertheless, responses indicated considerable disagreement and/or lack of understanding among both groups of teachers concerning the meanings/roles of proof and disproof and several other key terms. Therefore it appears that these teachers are poorly equipped to help students gain understanding of these key terms. Classroom use of the If/and/then/Therefore pattern of argumentation, which is employed in this paper to explicate the hypothesis/conjecture testing process, might be a first step toward rectifying this situation.

[1]  Mary Tiles,et al.  Astronomy and Mathematics in Ancient China: The Zhou Bi Suan Jing (review) , 1997 .

[2]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[3]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Proofs and Refutations: Frontmatter , 1976 .

[4]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: A response to Alters , 1997 .

[5]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[6]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  On the Uses of Rigorous Proof. (Book Reviews: Proofs and Refutations. The Logic of Mathematical Discovery) , 1977 .

[7]  R. Hersh.  What is Mathematics, Really? , 1998 .

[8]  J. Olson,et al.  The Nature of Science in International Science Education Standards Documents , 1998 .

[9]  Anton E. Lawson.  The Neurological basis of learning, development and discovery: implications for science and mathematics instruction / Anton E. Lawson , 2003 .

[10]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science , 2002 .

[11]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and Refutations , 1963 .

[12]  Morris Kline,et al.  Mathematics for the Nonmathematician , 1985 .

[13]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning , 2005 .

[14]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  What is the role of induction and deduction in reasoning and scientific inquiry , 2005 .

[15]  C. Hempel.  Philosophy of Natural Science , 1966 .

[16]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  The Nature and Development of Scientific Reasoning: A Synthetic View , 2004 .

[17]  Brian Alters,et al.  Whose nature of science , 1997 .

[18]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Language and thought , 2005 .

[19]  P. Dass,et al.  Understanding the Nature of Scientific Enterprise (NOSE) through a Discourse with Its History: The Influence of an Undergraduate ‘History of Science’ Course , 2005 .

[20]  James Woodward,et al.  Biological invasions as global environmental change , 1996 .

[21]  James Woodward,et al.  Conduct, Misconduct and the Structure of Science , 1996 .

[22]  Howard Kahane.  logic and Philosophy , 1969 .

[23]  Fou-Lai Lin,et al.  The Features and Relationships of Reasoning, Proving and Understanding Proof in Number Patterns , 2004 .

[24]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[25]  William F. McComas,et al.  The nature of science in science education : rationales and strategies , 1998 .

[26]  Reuben Hersh,et al.  What is Mathematics , 2000 .

[27]  Marios Pittalis,et al.  Proofs through Exploration in Dynamic Geometry Environments , 2004 .

[28]  Joan Ferrini-Mundy,et al.  Principles and Standards for School Mathematics: A Guide for Mathematicians , 2000 .

[29]  Amy Roth McDuffie,et al.  One course is not enough : Preservice elementary teachers' retention of improved views of nature of science , 2006 .

[30]  Morris Kline.  Mathematics and the Search for Knowledge , 1985 .

[31]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[32]  W. McComas,et al.  A Textbook Case of the Nature of Science: Laws and Theories in the Science of Biology , 2003 .