Reproducing complex simulations of economic impacts of climate change with lower-cost emulators

Abstract. Process-based models are powerful tools for simulating the economic impacts of climate change, but they are computationally expensive. In order to project climate-change impacts under various scenarios, produce probabilistic ensembles, conduct online coupled simulations, or explore pathways by numerical optimization, the computational and implementation cost of economic impact calculations should be reduced. To do so, in this study, we developed various emulators that mimic the behaviours of simulation models, namely economic models coupled with bio/physical-process-based impact models, by statistical regression techniques. Their performance was evaluated for multiple sectors and regions. Among the tested emulators, those composed of artificial neural networks, which can incorporate non-linearities and interactions between variables, performed better particularly when finer input variables were available. Although simple functional forms were effective for approximating general tendencies, complex emulators are necessary if the focus is regional or sectoral heterogeneity. Since the computational cost of the developed emulators is sufficiently small, they could be used to explore future scenarios related to climate-change policies. The findings of this study could also help researchers design their own emulators in different situations.

[1]  S. Kanae,et al.  Cooling Water Sufficiency in a Warming World: Projection Using an Integrated Assessment Model and a Global Hydrological Model , 2018, Water.

[2]  Michael F. Wehner,et al.  Half a degree additional warming, prognosis and projected impacts (HAPPI): background and experimental design , 2017 .

[3]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1989, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[4]  Qian Zhou,et al.  Economic Consequences of Cooling Water Insufficiency in the Thermal Power Sector under Climate Change Scenarios , 2018, Energies.

[5]  Dieter Gerten,et al.  Emulating global climate change impacts on crop yields , 2015 .

[6]  F. Piontek,et al.  A trend-preserving bias correction – the ISI-MIP approach , 2013 .

[7]  R. Tol Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change. Part 1: Benchmark Estimates , 2002 .

[8]  Ken’ichi Matsumoto Climate change impacts on socioeconomic activities through labor productivity changes considering interactions between socioeconomic and climate systems , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[9]  T. Yokohata,et al.  Economic implications of climate change impacts on human health through undernourishment , 2016, Climatic Change.

[10]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  The Marginal Damage Costs of Different Greenhouse Gases: An Application of FUND , 2014 .

[11]  Kenji Tanaka,et al.  Over 5,000 years of ensemble future climate simulations by 60-km global and 20-km regional atmospheric models , 2017 .

[12]  Reto Knutti,et al.  Improved pattern scaling approaches for the use in climate impact studies , 2015 .

[13]  Jean Chateau,et al.  Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .

[14]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Long-term economic benefits of stabilizing warming without overshoot – the ENGAGE model intercomparison , 2021 .

[15]  Andrea Castelletti,et al.  A general framework for Dynamic Emulation Modelling in environmental problems , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  Saharon Rosset,et al.  Leakage in data mining: formulation, detection, and avoidance , 2011, TKDD.

[17]  P. Harrison,et al.  Combining qualitative and quantitative understanding for exploring cross-sectoral climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability in Europe , 2013, Regional Environmental Change.

[18]  Thomas Sterner,et al.  Few and Not So Far Between: A Meta-analysis of Climate Damage Estimates , 2017 .

[19]  Ana Iglesias,et al.  Physical and economic consequences of climate change in Europe , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  J. Weyant Some Contributions of Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change , 2017, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[21]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[22]  M. Tamura,et al.  Global assessment of the effectiveness of adaptation in coastal areas based on RCP/SSP scenarios , 2019, Climatic Change.

[23]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[24]  M. Burke,et al.  Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production , 2015, Nature.

[25]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Revisiting the social cost of carbon , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  S. Hales,et al.  Heat-related mortality risk model for climate change impact projection , 2013, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine.

[27]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading , 2020, Nature.

[28]  Qian Zhou,et al.  Economic consequences of global climate change and mitigation on future hydropower generation , 2018, Climatic Change.

[29]  T. Iizumi,et al.  Macroeconomic Impacts of Climate Change Driven by Changes in Crop Yields , 2018, Sustainability.

[30]  Alex J. Cannon,et al.  Statistical emulation of streamflow projections from a distributed hydrological model: Application to CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate projections for British Columbia, Canada , 2014 .

[31]  Kiyoshi Takahashi,et al.  Avoided economic impacts of energy demand changes by 1.5 and 2 °C climate stabilization , 2018 .

[32]  Shinichiro Fujimori,et al.  Development of a global computable general equilibrium model coupled with detailed energy end-use technology , 2014 .

[33]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[34]  T. Iizumi,et al.  Responses of crop yield growth to global temperature and socioeconomic changes , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Ian P. Holman,et al.  Climate change impact modelling needs to include cross-sectoral interactions , 2016 .

[36]  Y. Honda,et al.  Cost of preventing workplace heat-related illness through worker breaks and the benefit of climate-change mitigation , 2017 .

[37]  Y. Hirabayashi,et al.  Quantifying the effect of autonomous adaptation to global river flood projections: application to future flood risk assessments , 2018 .

[38]  M. Kainuma,et al.  SSP3: AIM implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .

[39]  Ian Harris,et al.  Pattern scaling using ClimGen: monthly-resolution future climate scenarios including changes in the variability of precipitation , 2016, Climatic Change.

[40]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture , 2014, Climatic Change.

[41]  Wolfgang Lutz,et al.  The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100 , 2017, Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions.

[42]  T. Stocker,et al.  Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2012 .

[43]  A. Ito,et al.  MIROC-INTEG-LAND version 1: a global biogeochemical land surface model with human water management, crop growth, and land-use change , 2020, Geoscientific Model Development.

[44]  T. Oki,et al.  Dependence of economic impacts of climate change on anthropogenically directed pathways , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[45]  Kiyoshi Takahashi,et al.  Quantifying the economic impact of changes in energy demand for space heating and cooling systems under varying climatic scenarios , 2016, Palgrave Communications.

[46]  N. Stern The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[47]  Delavane B. Diaz,et al.  Quantifying the economic risks of climate change , 2017 .

[48]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  New Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change , 1998 .