An approach to the EuP Directive and the application of the economic eco-design for complex products

Current changes in European Union legislation forces design engineers to incorporate sustainable thinking, environmental protection and eco-design into their design considerations. Many companies are concerned that integrating the eco-design principle into their product design process could result in increasing product cost and a loss of their competitive edge. Within this paper recent and possible future developments of the ‘eco-design of energy using products’ (EuP) Directive are discussed as well as the effects this has on companies. The main outcome of this research is the development of a design decision methodology that helps the design engineer of complex products to apply the eco-design principles without a trade-off on economic issues. The paper explains how the framework takes into account the product hierarchy and supports changes to the product design. Furthermore the paper presents an example of how the basics of the methodology are applied to a small household item.

[1]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[2]  Helen Lewis,et al.  Design + Environment: A Global Guide to Designing Greener Goods , 2017 .

[3]  Jahau Lewis Chen,et al.  The conflict-problem-solving CAD software integrating TRIZ into eco-innovation , 2004 .

[4]  Leigh Patrick Holloway.  A methodology and support tool for environmentally conscious design and manufacture. , 1997 .

[5]  Guo Q. Huang,et al.  Design for X : concurrent engineering imperatives , 1996 .

[6]  A. Nee,et al.  A proposed tool to integrate environmental and economical assessments of products , 2003 .

[7]  Rajesh Jugulum,et al.  Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) , 2008 .

[8]  Stephen Siang Guan Lee,et al.  ECoDE – An Environmental Component Design Evaluation Tool , 2002, Engineering with Computers.

[9]  Kosuke Ishii,et al.  PRODUCT END-OF-LIFE STRATEGY CATEGORIZATION DESIGN TOOL , 1999 .

[10]  Gunter Ladewig,et al.  The Theory Of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) , 2001 .

[11]  Guido Berti,et al.  A Combined DFMA and TRIZ approach to the simplification of product structure , 2004 .

[12]  Michael Smith,et al.  The Natural Advantage of Nations: Business Opportunities, Innovations and Governance in the 21st Century , 2004 .

[13]  Olaf A.M. Fisscher,et al.  Organizing product-oriented environmental management from a firm's perspective , 2002 .

[14]  M. Schuckert,et al.  LCA as a Tool in the Design Process of Parts, Products and Systems , 1998 .

[15]  Kun-Mo Lee,et al.  Comparison of four methods for integrating environmental and economic aspects in the end-of-life stage of a washing machine , 2006 .

[16]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[17]  Han Brezet,et al.  Communicating the eco-efficiency of products and services by means of the eco-costs/value model , 2002 .

[18]  Barbara C. Lippiatt,et al.  Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability (BEES): Software for Selecting Cost-Effective Green Building Products | NIST , 2001 .

[19]  D. Alting,et al.  The Life Cycle Concept as a Basis for Sustainable Industrial Production , 1993 .