Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration

summary In an ideal world, a few overall indicators of hydrologic alteration would adequately describe the degree of hydrologic alteration caused by various forms of river regulation. Currently over 170 hydrologic indicators have been developed to describe different components of flow regimes, including the widely used Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA) that characterize the impact of river regulation on flow regimes in environmental flow studies. Many of these IHA indicators are intercorrelated, resulting in considerable information redundancy, which could lead to ineffective environmental flow management decisions. The objective of this research is to develop a small set of independent and representative hydrologic indicators that can best characterize hydrologic alteration caused by reservoirs and other forms of river regulation. Two sets of pre- and post-dam streamflow records are used: (1) based on artificial simulations of a wide range of reservoir release rules and (2) streamflow records for 189 gaging stations throughout the United States. Principal component analysis was used to address the intercorrelation among the IHA parameters. Results revealed that the recently introduced metrics termed ecodeficit and ecosurplus can provide a good overall representation of the degree of alteration of a streamflow time series. Across both datasets, 32 individual IHA statistics and several potential generalized indices, three indices based on the ecodeficit and ecosurplus explained the most variability associated with the ensemble of 32 IHA statistics.

[1]  Jenq-Tzong Shiau,et al.  COMPROMISE PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING INSTREAM FLOW UNDER MULTIOBJECTIVE WATER ALLOCATION CRITERIA 1 , 2006 .

[2]  O. Bragg,et al.  DHRAM: a method for classifying river flow regime alterations for the EC Water Framework Directive , 2005 .

[3]  David Yates,et al.  WEAP21—A Demand-, Priority-, and Preference-Driven Water Planning Model , 2005 .

[4]  R. Hirji,et al.  Environmental flows : concepts and methods , 2003 .

[5]  Brian Richter,et al.  Application of the Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration Software in Environmental Flow Setting 1 , 2007 .

[6]  D. Loucks.  Modeling and managing the interactions between hydrology, ecology and economics , 2006 .

[7]  Richard M. Vogel,et al.  Flow‐Duration Curves. I: New Interpretation and Confidence Intervals , 1994 .

[8]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[9]  Joseph J. Harrington,et al.  Effective dimensionality of environmental indicators: a principal component analysis with bootstrap confidence intervals , 1998 .

[10]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[11]  Ximing Cai,et al.  Identification of hydrologic indicators related to fish diversity and abundance: A data mining approach for fish community analysis , 2008 .

[12]  J. Olden,et al.  Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  W. Ripl.  Water: the bloodstream of the biosphere. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  Donald A. Jackson.  STOPPING RULES IN PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS: A COMPARISON OF HEURISTICAL AND STATISTICAL APPROACHES' , 1993 .

[15]  Jenq-Tzong Shiau,et al.  Pareto‐optimal solutions for environmental flow schemes incorporating the intra‐annual and interannual variability of the natural flow regime , 2007 .

[16]  R. Vogel,et al.  Relations among storage, yield, and instream flow , 2007 .

[17]  D. Hannah,et al.  Selection of river flow indices for the assessment of hydroecological change , 2007 .

[18]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[19]  J. Wayland Eheart,et al.  Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: Incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime , 2006 .

[20]  J. Olden,et al.  Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes , 2003 .

[21]  Richard M. Vogel,et al.  Storage Reservoir Behavior in the United States , 1999 .

[22]  C. Revenga,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of the World's Large River Systems , 2005, Science.

[23]  Water Resources and Environmental History , 2004 .

[24]  Richard M. Vogel,et al.  Flow duration curves II : a review of applications in water resources planning , 1995 .

[25]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[26]  F. Magilligan,et al.  Changes in hydrologic regime by dams , 2005 .

[27]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[28]  G. Dunteman.  Principal Components Analysis , 1989 .