Reaction and colonization of common bean genotypes by Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. Flaccumfaciens

Bacterial wilt is one of the main diseases of common beans and the use of cultivars with some level of resistance is fundamental for an adequate disease management. The reaction of 54 common bean genotypes to Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens (Cff) was evaluated, and the colonization of cultivars and obstruction of primary xylem vessels at the petiole base were assessed. In greenhouse and laboratory tests, resistance was detected in the cultivars IAC Diplomata, IAC Alvorada, IAC Imperador, IPR Corujinha, and IPR Tangara, and in the lines P5-4-4-1 and C4-5-4-1-2. The Cff colonization rate was also slower in the resistant cultivars (IAC Diplomata, IAC Carioca Tybata, and IAC Carioca Pyata) and the percentage of obstruction of primary xylem vessels at the petiole base lower than in the susceptible cultivars (IAC Carioca and Perola).

[1]  Nilton Rocha Leal,et al.  Identificação de fontes de resistência e avaliação de métodos de inoculação de Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens em feijão-de-vagem , 2015 .

[2]  J. L. M. Coimbra,et al.  Seleção precoce em plantas segregantes de feijoeiro para resistência à murcha de Curtobacterium , 2012 .

[3]  A. F. Guidolin,et al.  Sources of resistance to Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens in common bean accessions , 2011 .

[4]  Rodovia Admar Gonzaga Herança da resistência em feijoeiro à murcha causada por Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens , 2011 .

[5]  Eppo Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens. [Distribution map]. , 2010 .

[6]  J. L. M. Coimbra,et al.  Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens: etiologia,detecção e medidas de controle , 2010 .

[7]  A. Maringoni,et al.  PLANT-TO-SEED TRANSMISSION OF CURTOBACTERIUM FLACCUMFACIENS pv. FLACCUMACIENS IN A DRY BEAN CULTIVAR , 2009 .

[8]  T. Hsieh,et al.  Resurgence of bacterial wilt of common bean in North America , 2009 .

[9]  R. Rodrigues,et al.  Identification of resistance sources and evaluation of Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flacumfacceins inoculation methods in snap bean , 2009 .

[10]  V. D. Souza,et al.  Análise ultraestrutural da interação de Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens em genótipos de feijoeiro , 2008 .

[11]  C. Colombo,et al.  IAC-Alvorada and IAC-Diplomata: new common bean cultivars , 2008 .

[12]  M. F. Ito,et al.  Resistência genética em genótipos de feijoeiro a Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens , 2006 .

[13]  A. C. Maringoni,et al.  Murcha-de-curtobacterium do feijoeiro no Estado de Santa Catarina e reação de genótipos a Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens , 2006 .

[14]  A. Maringoni,et al.  Semi-selective culture medium for Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens isolation from bean seeds , 2006 .

[15]  L. C. Fazuoli,et al.  Avaliação da suscetibilidade à xylella fastidiosa emdiferentes espécies de cafeeiro , 2005 .

[16]  J. R. Fonseca,et al.  New sources of resistance to bacterial wilt identified in dry bean germplasm collection , 2004 .

[17]  Iac Carioca COMPORTAMENTO DE CULTIVARES DE FEIJOEIRO COMUM À MURCHA-DE-CURTOBACTERIUM* , 2002 .

[18]  M. Nicole,et al.  Cytochemistry of defense responses in cassava infected by Xanthomonas campestris pv. manihotis , 1996 .

[19]  Laurence V. Madden,et al.  Introduction to Plant Disease Epidemiology , 1990 .

[20]  R. Nelson Genetics of Horizontal Resistance to Plant Diseases , 1978 .

[21]  F. Hedges A BACTERIAL WILT OF THE BEAN CAUSED BY BACTERIUM FLACCUMFACIENS NOV. SP. , 1922, Science.