A comparison of visual‐ and stereo‐video based fish community assessment methods in tropical and temperate marine waters of Western Australia

Robust assessments of abundance and diversity are essential components of research programs aimed at detecting changes in marine fish assemblages through space and time. This study examined the comparability of Underwater Visual Census (UVC), and Diver Operated stereo-Video (Stereo-DOV) datasets collected across a wide latitudinal range (15°) on coral reefs and temperate rocky shores. There were some differences between methods with regards to both species richness and abundance, with UVC consistently recording higher meas ures of species richness. Differences were most pronounced at tropical locations where these measures were high. Differences in the characteristics of fish assemblages were primarily driven by UVC differentiating between scarid and pomacentrid species and detecting more cryptic species. When examined at higher taxo nomic or functional levels however, there was greater comparability between the assemblages recorded by each method, particularly in temperate locations. The UVC method also recorded higher abundances of species tar geted by fishers in tropical/sub-tropical locations, and subsequently obtained a much higher proportion of length measurements for these species. Data collected using stereo-DOV took 2-3 times longer to obtain than with UVC due to extensive post-processing time required by the stereo-DOV method. This study shows that data collected by the two methods are most comparable in temperate locations, or when examined at higher taxonomic/functional levels. Comparisons should however be more cautious in higher diversity locations, or when assessing at finer taxonomic resolution. When assessing the suitability of either method, availability of time, funding, and relevant expertise should be primary considerations.

[1]  Z. Caldwell.  Reef Fish Monitoring Techniques: Assessing the Possibility of Producing Comparable Data through a Standardized Method , 2011 .

[2]  R. Millar,et al.  Detection of spatial variability in relative density of fishes: comparison of visual census, angling, and baited underwater video , 2000 .

[3]  Juergen Noll,et al.  The Power of Monitoring , 2004, German Law Journal.

[4]  R. Myers.  Micronesian reef fishes : a comprehensive guide to the coral reef fishes of Micronesia , 1999 .

[5]  A. Pearce,et al.  Influence of the Leeuwin current on recruitment of tropical reef fishes at Rottnest Island, western Australia , 1994 .

[6]  E. Harvey,et al.  From fronds to fish: the use of indicators for ecological monitoring in marine benthic ecosystems, with case studies from temperate Western Australia , 2011, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[7]  G. Shedrawi,et al.  Assessing reef fish assemblage structure: how do different stereo-video techniques compare? , 2010 .

[8]  S. Wilson,et al.  Responses of reef fish communities to coral declines on the Great Barrier Reef , 2008 .

[9]  Stephen A. Bortone,et al.  Visual Census of Reef Fish Assemblages: A Comparison of Slate, Audio, and Video Recording Devices , 1991 .

[10]  Phil Culverhouse,et al.  Time to automate identification , 2010, Nature.

[11]  Euan S. Harvey,et al.  Potential of video techniques to monitor diversity, abundance and size of fish in studies of Marine Protected Areas , 2003 .

[12]  Comparisons of abundance of coral‐reef fish: Catch and effort surveys vs visual census , 1998 .

[13]  Gary A. Kendrick,et al.  Differences in fish assemblages from different reef habitats at Hamelin Bay, south-western Australia , 2003 .

[14]  Euan S. Harvey,et al.  A Review of Underwater Stereo-Image Measurement for Marine Biology and Ecology Applications , 2009 .

[15]  Euan S. Harvey,et al.  A Comparison of the Accuracy and Precision of Measurements from Single and Stereo-Video Systems , 2002 .

[16]  Raymond N. Gorley,et al.  PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER. Guide to software and statistical methods , 2008 .

[17]  M. Pratchett,et al.  Maintenance of fish diversity on disturbed coral reefs , 2009, Coral Reefs.

[18]  G. Shedrawi,et al.  Cost-efficient sampling of fish assemblages: comparison of baited video stations and diver video transects , 2010 .

[19]  A. Cheal,et al.  Comparing visual counts of coral reef fish: implications of transect width and species selection , 1997 .

[20]  E. Harvey,et al.  A comparison of temperate reef fish assemblages recorded by three underwater stereo-video techniques , 2005 .

[21]  G. Cresswell,et al.  Observations of a south-flowing current in the southeastern Indian Ocean , 1980 .

[22]  Gary A. Kendrick,et al.  A comparison of underwater visual distance estimates made by scuba divers and a stereo-video system: implications for underwater visual census of reef fish abundance , 2004 .

[23]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[24]  Euan S. Harvey,et al.  Influence of Range, Angle of View, Image Resolution and Image Compression on Underwater Stereo-Video Measurements: High-Definition and Broadcast-Resolution Video Cameras Compared , 2010 .

[25]  P. Auster,et al.  Effects of mat morphology on large Sargassum-associated fishes: observations from a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) and free-floating video camcorders , 1998, Environmental Biology of Fishes.