Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures

Sutures are classified into non-absorbable and absorbable, and mechanical properties of these materials vary by the composition. Knotting induces decrease in mechanical properties. The objective of this study was to measure the tensile and knot security properties depending on the type and caliber of sutures. Changes in properties after tensile loading were measured with absorbable sutures. Tensile properties such as maximum tensile load, elongation rate, stiffness and energy absorbed before breakage of seven kinds of surgical sutures were measured. Absorbable sutures were immersed in 37 °C Hank’s balanced salt solution up to 14 days under the tensile load of 100 g/thread, and properties were measured again. Knot was formed with surgeon’s knot method, and tensile properties were measured. Five specimens were tested for each condition. Values were analyzed with one- or two-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05). Maximum tensile load of seven sutures (caliber = 4-0) ranged from 10.0 N to 14.3 N. In non-absorbable sutures, the type of suture material influenced the tensile properties (P < 0.05). In absorbable sutures, the maximum tensile load after tensile loading decreased, which was significant in chromic catgut (CC). Knot security of seven sutures (caliber = 4-0) ranged from 8.7 N to 11.9 N. Type of non-absorbable suture influenced knot security (P < 0.05), and the synthetic monofilament materials showed a tendency to be untied easily. Since no single suture material possesses all of the requirements, proper type and caliber suture should be selected based on this study.

[1]  I. Trail,et al.  An evaluation of suture materials used in tendon surgery. , 1989, Journal of hand surgery.

[2]  J. Labagnara,et al.  A Review of Absorbable Suture Materials in Head & Neck Surgery and Introduction of Monocryl: A New Absorbable Suture , 1995, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[3]  A. Sağlam,et al.  Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[4]  R. Moy,et al.  Commonly used suture materials in skin surgery. , 1991, American family physician.

[5]  D. Prabhat,et al.  Ear nose throat , 1999 .

[6]  J. Unger,et al.  The effect of number of throws on knot security with nonidentical sliding knots. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Mechanical properties of biodegradable polymer sutures coated with bioactive glass , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[8]  L. Gottlieb,et al.  Mechanical comparison of 10 suture materials before and after in vivo incubation. , 1994, The Journal of surgical research.

[9]  R. Zdrahala Small Caliber Vascular Grafts. Part I: State of the Art , 1996, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[10]  T. Davis,et al.  A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repair. , 2005, The Journal of hand surgery.

[11]  Robert B. Anderson,et al.  Strength and Knot Security of Braided Polyester and Caprolactone/Glycolide Suture , 2004, Foot & ankle international.

[12]  M. Kaess,et al.  Biodegradation of Absorbable Sutures in Body Fluids and pH Buffers , 2004, European Surgical Research.

[13]  R. Shaw,et al.  A prospective clinical evaluation of the longevity of resorbable sutures in oral mucosa. , 1996, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[14]  R. Moy,et al.  Commonly used suturing techniques in skin surgery. , 1991, American family physician.

[15]  T. Nolan,et al.  Primary mass closure of midline incisions with a continuous polyglyconate monofilament absorbable suture. , 1990 .

[16]  R. Bodmeier,et al.  Physicomechanical properties of biodegradable poly(D,L-lactide) and poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) films in the dry and wet states. , 2000, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[17]  J. McPherson,et al.  Effect of the wicking behavior of multifilament sutures. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.