Breast cancer genomes from CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation carriers lack somatic TP53 mutations and display a unique structural variant size distribution profile
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. Hollestelle | Wendy J. C. Prager-van der Smissen | M. Smid | A. Broeks | M. Adank | M. Hooning | S. Cornelissen | J. Collée | A. M. Trapman-Jansen | A. Timmermans | K. Ruigrok-Ritstier | M. Schreurs | Marjanka K. Schmidt | Aida Marsal Garcia | J. Martens
[1] M. Smid,et al. Lost by Transcription: Fork Failures, Elevated Expression, and Clinical Consequences Related to Deletions in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2022, International journal of molecular sciences.
[2] R. Eeles,et al. Functional Analysis Identifies Damaging CHEK2 Missense Variants Associated with Increased Cancer Risk , 2021, Cancer research.
[3] Nadezhda T. Doncheva,et al. The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein–protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets , 2020, Nucleic Acids Res..
[4] E. Winer,et al. TBCRC 048: Phase II Study of Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer and Mutations in Homologous Recombination-Related Genes. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[5] F. Feng,et al. Non-BRCA DNA Damage Repair Gene Alterations and Response to the PARP Inhibitor Rucaparib in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Analysis From the Phase II TRITON2 Study , 2020, Clinical Cancer Research.
[6] J. Martens,et al. Pan-cancer landscape of homologous recombination deficiency , 2020, Nature Communications.
[7] Icgc,et al. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes , 2017, bioRxiv.
[8] Z. Szallasi,et al. Correlation of homologous recombination deficiency induced mutational signatures with sensitivity to PARP inhibitors and cytotoxic agents , 2019, Genome Biology.
[9] S. Sleijfer,et al. The genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer highlights changes in mutation and signature frequencies , 2019, Nature Genetics.
[10] J. Reis-Filho,et al. The Landscape of Somatic Genetic Alterations in Breast Cancers from CHEK2 Germline Mutation Carriers , 2019, JNCI cancer spectrum.
[11] Ville Mustonen,et al. The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer , 2018, Nature.
[12] S. Sleijfer,et al. Pan-cancer whole genome analyses of metastatic solid tumors , 2018, bioRxiv.
[13] Rui Bi,et al. The Landscape of Somatic Genetic Alterations in Breast Cancers From ATM Germline Mutation Carriers. , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[14] Anneke A. vd Wurff,et al. Gene length corrected trimmed mean of M-values (GeTMM) processing of RNA-seq data performs similarly in intersample analyses while improving intrasample comparisons , 2018, BMC Bioinformatics.
[15] B. Taylor,et al. Genome doubling shapes the evolution and prognosis of advanced cancers , 2018, Nature Genetics.
[16] M. Stratton,et al. Universal Patterns of Selection in Cancer and Somatic Tissues , 2018, Cell.
[17] Peter J. Park,et al. Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing , 2018, bioRxiv.
[18] M. Look,et al. IGF1R signaling drives antiestrogen resistance through PAK2/PIX activation in luminal breast cancer , 2018, Oncogene.
[19] R. Verhaak,et al. The Tandem Duplicator Phenotype Is a Prevalent Genome-Wide Cancer Configuration Driven by Distinct Gene Mutations , 2017, bioRxiv.
[20] E. Cuppen,et al. MutationalPatterns: comprehensive genome-wide analysis of mutational processes , 2017, bioRxiv.
[21] E. Lander,et al. A mutational signature reveals alterations underlying deficient homologous recombination repair in breast cancer , 2017, Nature Genetics.
[22] E. Birney,et al. HRDetect is a predictor of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiency based on mutational signatures , 2017, Nature Medicine.
[23] Michael Jones,et al. Age- and Tumor Subtype-Specific Breast Cancer Risk Estimates for CHEK2*1100delC Carriers. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[24] E. Birney,et al. Breast cancer genome and transcriptome integration implicates specific mutational signatures with immune cell infiltration , 2016, Nature Communications.
[25] J. Foekens,et al. The 29.5 kb APOBEC3B Deletion Polymorphism Is Not Associated with Clinical Outcome of Breast Cancer , 2016, PloS one.
[26] V. Seshan,et al. FACETS: allele-specific copy number and clonal heterogeneity analysis tool for high-throughput DNA sequencing , 2016, Nucleic acids research.
[27] David C. Jones,et al. Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole genome sequences , 2016, Nature.
[28] J. Martens,et al. Genomic profiling of CHEK2*1100delC-mutated breast carcinomas , 2015, BMC Cancer.
[29] A. Sieuwerts,et al. Sensitivity to systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer in CHEK2 1100delC mutation carriers , 2015, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.
[30] Edwin Cuppen,et al. Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats , 2015, Bioinform..
[31] D. Delia,et al. CHK2 kinase in the DNA damage response and beyond , 2014, Journal of molecular cell biology.
[32] A Hollestelle,et al. Survival and contralateral breast cancer in CHEK2 1100delC breast cancer patients: impact of adjuvant chemotherapy , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.
[33] Wei Shi,et al. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features , 2013, Bioinform..
[34] David T. W. Jones,et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.
[35] Thomas R. Gingeras,et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner , 2013, Bioinform..
[36] S. Cross,et al. CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity in women with breast cancer associated with early death, breast cancer-specific death, and increased risk of a second breast cancer. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[37] A. Børresen-Dale,et al. Mutational Processes Molding the Genomes of 21 Breast Cancers , 2012, Cell.
[38] J. Lubiński,et al. Different CHEK2 germline mutations are associated with distinct immunophenotypic molecular subtypes of breast cancer , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[39] J. Foekens,et al. Gene expression profiling assigns CHEK2 1100delC breast cancers to the luminal intrinsic subtypes , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[40] D. Greco,et al. Breast tumors from CHEK2 1100delC-mutation carriers: genomic landscape and clinical implications , 2011, Breast Cancer Research.
[41] M. Yin,et al. Mice with the CHEK2*1100delC SNP are predisposed to cancer with a strong gender bias , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[42] Noriaki Ohuchi,et al. Prediction of breast cancer prognosis by gene expression profile of TP53 status , 2008, Cancer science.
[43] Brad T. Sherman,et al. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources , 2008, Nature Protocols.
[44] M. Yin,et al. The breast cancer susceptibility allele CHEK2*1100delC promotes genomic instability in a knock-in mouse model. , 2007, Mutation research.
[45] J. Peterse,et al. Breast cancer survival and tumor characteristics in premenopausal women carrying the CHEK2*1100delC germline mutation. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[46] Cheng Li,et al. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. , 2007, Biostatistics.
[47] Jiandong Chen,et al. MDM2 interaction with nuclear corepressor KAP1 contributes to p53 inactivation , 2005, The EMBO journal.
[48] M. Schutte,et al. Tumour characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer patients carrying the germline CHEK2*1100delC variant , 2004, Journal of Medical Genetics.
[49] Nazneen Rahman,et al. CHEK2*1100delC and susceptibility to breast cancer: a collaborative analysis involving 10,860 breast cancer cases and 9,065 controls from 10 studies. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.
[50] J. Klijn,et al. Excess Risk for Contralateral Breast Cancer in CHEK2*1100delC Germline Mutation Carriers , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[51] Hilde van der Togt,et al. Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..
[52] R. Eeles,et al. Increasing evidence that germline mutations in CHEK2 do not cause Li‐Fraumeni syndrome , 2002, Human mutation.
[53] E. Appella,et al. Chk2‐deficient mice exhibit radioresistance and defective p53‐mediated transcription , 2002, The EMBO journal.
[54] P. Jeggo,et al. Chk2 Is a Tumor Suppressor That Regulates Apoptosis in both an Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM)-Dependent and an ATM-Independent Manner , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[55] O. Kallioniemi,et al. A CHEK2 genetic variant contributing to a substantial fraction of familial breast cancer. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.
[56] Nazneen Rahman,et al. Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2*1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations , 2002, Nature Genetics.
[57] R. Vossen,et al. Complete sequencing of TP53 predicts poor response to systemic therapy of advanced breast cancer. , 2000, Cancer research.
[58] S. Elledge,et al. DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint kinase Chk2. , 2000, Science.
[59] K. Isselbacher,et al. Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. , 1999, Science.
[60] L. Holmberg,et al. The p53 gene in breast cancer: prognostic value of complementary DNA sequencing versus immunohistochemistry. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[61] K. Heimdal,et al. Prognostic significance of TP53 alterations in breast carcinoma. , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.
[62] A. Craft,et al. p53 germline mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome , 1991, The Lancet.
[63] W. Blattner,et al. Germ-line transmission of a mutated p53 gene in a cancer-prone family with Li–Fraumeni syndrome , 1990, Nature.