Quantitative image analysis: software systems in drug development trials.

Multi-dimensional image analysis is being used increasingly to arrive at surrogate end-points for drug development trials. Various imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and ultrasound are used to analyze treatments for diseases such as cancer, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, and Alzheimer's disease. However, extracting information from images can be tedious and is prone to high user variability. The medical image analysis community is moving towards advanced software systems specifically designed for drug development trials. These systems can automatically identify the anatomy of interest in medical images (segmentation methods), can compare the anatomy over time or between patients (registration methods) and allow the quantitative extraction of anatomical features and the integration of the data and results into a database management system, automatically tracking the changes made to the data (audit trail generation). In this article, we present a case study using a prototype system that is used for quantifying multiple sclerosis lesions from multivariate MRI.

[1]  C C Glüer,et al.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. , 1994, Radiology.

[2]  Andrew S. Glassner,et al.  Graphics Gems , 1990 .

[3]  R. Bajcsy,et al.  Elastically Deforming 3D Atlas to Match Anatomical Brain Images , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Image Segmentation Using Deformable Models , 2000 .

[5]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High-resolution MRI and micro-FE for the evaluation of changes in bone mechanical properties during longitudinal clinical trials: application to calcaneal bone in postmenopausal women after one year of idoxifene treatment. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  Temporal Changes in Brain Volume and Cognition in a Randomized Treatment Trial of Vascular Dementia , 2001, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[7]  Sankar K. Pal,et al.  A review on image segmentation techniques , 1993, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  D. Paty,et al.  Interferon beta‐1b is effective in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis , 1993, Neurology.

[10]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  R. Killiany,et al.  Quantitative follow‐up of patients with multiple sclerosis using MRI: Reproducibility , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  S Saini,et al.  Quantitative measurements of medical images for pharmaceutical clinical trials: comparison between on-site and off-site assessments. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Andrzej Materka,et al.  Two-phase active contour method for semiautomatic segmentation of the heart and blood vessels from MRI images for 3D visualization. , 2002, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[14]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[15]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Automatic "pipeline" analysis of 3-D MRI data for clinical trials: application to multiple sclerosis , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Laurent D. Cohen,et al.  Global Minimum for Active Contour Models: A Minimal Path Approach , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[17]  Isaac N. Bankman,et al.  Handbook of Medical Imaging. Processing and Analysis , 2002 .

[18]  Arnold W. M. Smeulders,et al.  Interaction in the segmentation of medical images: A survey , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  J. Udupa,et al.  Shape-based interpolation of multidimensional objects. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[20]  J E Wickham,et al.  Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate? , 1996, British journal of urology.

[21]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  User-Steered Image Segmentation Paradigms: Live Wire and Live Lane , 1998, Graph. Model. Image Process..

[22]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Using serial registered brain magnetic resonance imaging to measure disease progression in Alzheimer disease: power calculations and estimates of sample size to detect treatment effects. , 2000, Archives of neurology.

[23]  D R Haynor,et al.  Partial volume tissue classification of multichannel magnetic resonance images-a mixel model. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[24]  W Huda,et al.  Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS). , 1994, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[25]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[26]  J K Udupa,et al.  MR image analysis in multiple sclerosis. , 2000, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[27]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Automated Hippocampal Segmentation by Regional Fluid Registration of Serial MRI: Validation and Application in Alzheimer's Disease , 2001, NeuroImage.

[28]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  The determinants of change in tibial cartilage volume in osteoarthritic knees. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[29]  T. Stammberger,et al.  Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: Computational method and reproducibility in the living , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Current methods in medical image segmentation. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[31]  G A Ateshian,et al.  Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[32]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Elastic registration of 3D cartilage surfaces from MR image data for detecting local changes in cartilage thickness , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality image registration techniques , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[34]  W. Shabana,et al.  Reducing inter-observer variation in thyroid volume calculation using a new formula and technique. , 2003, European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[35]  M. Rudin,et al.  From anatomy to the target: Contributions of magnetic resonance imaging to preclinical pharmaceutical research , 2001, The Anatomical record.

[36]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A survey of medical image registration , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[37]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Accurate, Robust, and Automated Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Brain Change Analysis , 2002, NeuroImage.

[38]  J. Besag.  On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures , 1986 .

[39]  P J Elliott,et al.  Interactive region and volume growing for segmenting volumes in MR and CT images. , 1994, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[40]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Automated multi-moda lity image registration based on information theory , 1995 .

[41]  T Stammberger,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[42]  R P Velthuizen,et al.  MRI segmentation: methods and applications. , 1995, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[43]  G. Comi,et al.  Intraobserver and interobserver variability in schemes for estimating volume of brain lesions on MR images in multiple sclerosis. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[44]  A. Miller,et al.  Reporting results of cancer treatment , 1981, Cancer.

[45]  Role of MR imaging in clinical research studies. , 2001, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[46]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[47]  Saara Totterman,et al.  Accuracy and reproducibility of manual and semiautomated quantification of MS lesions by MRI , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[48]  Paul S. Heckbert,et al.  A seed fill algorithm , 1990 .