Locating End-Effector Tips in Robotic Micromanipulation

In robotic micromanipulation, end-effector tips must be first located under microscopy imaging before manipulation is performed. The tip of micromanipulation tools is typically a few micrometers in size and highly delicate. In all existing micromanipulation systems, the process of locating the end-effector tip is conducted by a skilled operator, and the automation of this task has not been attempted. This paper presents a technique to automatically locate end-effector tips. The technique consists of programmed sweeping patterns, motion history image end-effector detection, active contour to estimate end-effector positions, autofocusing and quad-tree search to locate an end-effector tip, and, finally, visual servoing to position the tip to the center of the field of view. Two types of micromanipulation tools (micropipette that represents single-ended tools and microgripper that represents multiended tools) were used in experiments for testing. Quantitative results are reported in the speed and success rate of the autolocating technique, based on over 500 trials. Furthermore, the effect of factors such as imaging mode and image processing parameter selections was also quantitatively discussed. Guidelines are provided for the implementation of the technique in order to achieve high efficiency and success rates.

[1]  Md. Atiqur Rahman Ahad,et al.  Motion history image: its variants and applications , 2012, Machine Vision and Applications.

[2]  Brahim Tamadazte,et al.  Robotic Micromanipulation and Microassembly Using Monoview and Multiscale Visual Servoing , 2011, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[3]  Yajing Shen,et al.  Micro- and Nanomechatronics , 2010, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[4]  Ryad Benosman,et al.  Asynchronous Event-Based Visual Shape Tracking for Stable Haptic Feedback in Microrobotics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[5]  Bradley J Nelson,et al.  Autofocusing in computer microscopy: Selecting the optimal focus algorithm , 2004, Microscopy research and technique.

[6]  Harry E. Stephanou,et al.  Micro and Meso Scale Robotic Assembly , 2004 .

[7]  Clement Leung,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Locomotive Behavior of Human Sperm Head and Tail , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  T. Yamaura,et al.  Image-based autonomous micromanipulation system for arrangement of spheres in a scanning electron microscope , 2004 .

[9]  Sim Heng Ong,et al.  Autofocusing for tissue microscopy , 1993, Image Vis. Comput..

[10]  Zhuo Yang Fast Template Matching Based on Normalized Cross Correlation with Centroid Bounding , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation.

[11]  E. R. Davies,et al.  Machine vision - theory, algorithms, practicalities , 2004 .

[12]  Kazuhiro Hotta,et al.  Automatic Particle Detection and Counting by One-Class SVM from Microscope Image , 2008, ICONIP.

[13]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[14]  Zheng Gong,et al.  Locating end-effector tips in automated micromanipulation , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  William L. Cleghorn,et al.  Vision-based measurement of microassembly forces , 2006 .

[16]  Dan O. Popa,et al.  Micro and Mesoscale Robotic Assembly , 2004 .

[17]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Active Release of Microobjects Using a MEMS Microgripper to Overcome Adhesion Forces , 2009, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[18]  B. Nelson,et al.  Monolithically Fabricated Microgripper With Integrated Force Sensor for Manipulating Microobjects and Biological Cells Aligned in an Ultrasonic Field , 2007, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[19]  Hamid Krim,et al.  A Shearlet Approach to Edge Analysis and Detection , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Microscale and nanoscale robotics systems [Grand Challenges of Robotics] , 2007, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.