Subsidence Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular and Monolithic Components.

[1]  J. Vigdorchik,et al.  Nonmodular Stems Are a Viable Alternative to Modular Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  D. Berry,et al.  Risk Factors for Subsidence of Modular Fluted Tapered Stems Used During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip Fractures. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  C. Boese,et al.  Femoral stem subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective single-centre study , 2018, International Orthopaedics.

[4]  M. Cross,et al.  Fracture risk of tapered modular revision stems: a failure analysis , 2017, Arthroplasty today.

[5]  D. Bohl,et al.  Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Monoblock Splined Tapered Grit-Blasted Titanium Stem. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  B. Masri,et al.  Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs , 2017, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  J. Clohisy,et al.  Contemporary Surgical Indications and Referral Trends in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Review. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  B. Masri,et al.  Modular tapered titanium stems in revision arthroplasty of the hip: The Risk and Causes of Stem Fracture. , 2016, The bone & joint journal.

[9]  A. Gross,et al.  Risk Factors for Subsidence of a Modular Tapered Femoral Stem Used for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  P. Lachiewicz,et al.  What is the Survivorship of Fully Coated Femoral Components in Revision Hip Arthroplasty? , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  J. Block,et al.  Hybrid Biosynthetic Autograft Extender for Use in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Safety and Clinical Effectiveness. , 2015, The open orthopaedics journal.

[12]  N. Dehghan,et al.  Proximal femoral arthroplasty in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  C. Ranawat,et al.  Reproducible fixation with a tapered, fluted, modular, titanium stem in revision hip arthroplasty at 8-15 years follow-up. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  B. Fink,et al.  Mid term results with the curved modular tapered, fluted titanium Revitan stem in revision hip replacement. , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[15]  Jacob T. Munro,et al.  Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in the Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  D. Berry,et al.  Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Modular Fluted, Tapered Stems , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  T. Hansen,et al.  Revision Hip Arthroplasty with an Extensively Porous-coated Stem - Excellent Long-term Results Also in Severe Femoral Bone Stock Loss , 2013, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[18]  B. Masri,et al.  High Survival of Modular Tapered Stems for Proximal Femoral Bone Defects at 5 to 10 Years Followup , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  A comparison of modular tapered versus modular cylindrical stems for complex femoral revisions. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  D. Regis,et al.  Femoral revision with the Wagner tapered stem: a ten- to 15-year follow-up study. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  F. Canovas,et al.  Stem subsidence after total hip revision: 183 cases at 5.9 years follow-up. , 2011, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[22]  D. Backstein,et al.  Fracture of cementless femoral stems at the mid-stem junction in modular revision hip arthroplasty systems. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  D. Ham,et al.  Management of periprosthetic femur fractures treated with distal fixation using a modular femoral stem using an anterolateral approach. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[24]  E. Garcia-Cimbrelo,et al.  Radiographic bone regeneration and clinical outcome with the Wagner SL revision stem: a 5-year to 12-year follow-up study. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[25]  C. Engh,et al.  Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: a choice for all seasons. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[26]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  S. Larsson,et al.  Early Migration Pattern of the Uncemented CLS Stem in Total Hip Arthroplasties , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  S. Sporer,et al.  Femoral Fixation in the Face of Considerable Bone Loss: The Use of Modular Stems , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  José A. Rodriguez,et al.  Revision total hip arthroplasty with proximal bone loss. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[30]  C. D. Della Valle,et al.  The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  E. Morscher,et al.  Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis , 1997, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[32]  D. Berry.  Femoral revision: distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[33]  C. Perka,et al.  The effect of anatomical positional relationships on kinetic parameters after total hip replacement , 2000, International Orthopaedics.

[34]  J. Antoniou,et al.  Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  J. Moreland,et al.  Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[36]  W. Bargar,et al.  Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[37]  J. Callaghan,et al.  The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. Results after five to seven years in a prospective study. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[38]  H. Wagner.  [A revision prosthesis for the hip joint]. , 1989, Der Orthopade.

[39]  H. Wagner.  [Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone loss]. , 1987, Der Orthopade.

[40]  P. D. Wilson,et al.  Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.