Effects on human maximum bite force of biting on a softer or harder object.

A recent study concluded that the pulps of human incisor teeth may contain mechanoreceptors. These provide the input for a protective mechanism that reflexly limits the maximum bite force by monitoring the stress on compressed dentine. In separate experiments it was later shown that individuals can accurately detect whether they are biting on a harder or softer surface when it seemed that the only receptors which could have detected the difference must have been in the tooth pulps. Thus, pulpal mechanoreceptors may be used subconsciously to limit the maximum bite force and consciously to detect differences in hardness. If these conclusions are correct the maximum bite force should be larger when incising on a soft (rubber) surface than on a hard (acrylic) surface because when the teeth sink into the rubber the bite force is spread over a larger area, thereby reducing the local stress. A reduction in stress allows an increase in bite force. But if the tooth were previously covered with an acrylic crown, which would already reduce the stress by distributing the bite force over a large area of the incisor crown, there would be little or no difference in the maximum bite force whether biting on rubber or acrylic. The results of experiments on 15 participants confirm these predictions and support the hypothesis that the pulps of human incisors contain high-threshold mechanoreceptors.

[1]  J W Osborn,et al.  The effect of pressure on a maximum incisal bite force in man. , 1997, Archives of oral biology.

[2]  J. W. Osborn,et al.  Effect of Jaw Opening on the Direction and Magnitude of Human Incisal Bite Forces , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[3]  G. Throckmorton,et al.  Effects of local anesthesia on bite force generation and electromyographic activity. , 1991, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[4]  F. Sundström,et al.  Intradental nerve activity and jaw-opening reflex in response to mechanical deformation of cat teeth. , 1988, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[5]  J. H. Vries,et al.  The influence of local anaesthesia and occlusal surface area on the forces developed during repetitive maximal clenching efforts , 1978 .

[6]  M. Könönen,et al.  Bite force on single as opposed to all maxillary front teeth. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[7]  Richard F. Martin,et al.  Physiological properties of intradental mechanoreceptors , 1985, Brain Research.

[8]  B. Matthews,et al.  Sensory and reflex responses to tooth pulp stimulation in man , 1976, Brain Research.

[9]  J. W. Osborn,et al.  Discrimination of hardness by human teeth apparently not involving periodontal receptors. , 1998, Archives of oral biology.

[10]  G. Hellsing On the regulation of interincisor bite force in man. , 1980, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[11]  J. W. Osborn,et al.  Features of human jaw design which maximize the bite force. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  R. Orchardson,et al.  The effect of local periodontal anaesthesia on the maximum biting force achieved by human subjects. , 1980, Archives of oral biology.

[13]  C. Cox,et al.  H 3-HRP Analysis of the Nerve Supply to Primate Teeth , 1980, Journal of dental research.

[14]  Y. Lamarre,et al.  The importance of positive feedback from periodontal pressoreceptors during voluntary isometric contraction of jaw-closing muscles in man. , 1973, Journal de biologie buccale.

[15]  K. Mardia Statistics of Directional Data , 1972 .