Investigation of the effects of different nanoparticle additionals on the mechanical properties of silicone elastomer used in maxillofacial prosthesis

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in the mechanical properties of silicone elastomer used in the production of maxillofacial prostheses with the addition of 3 different nanoparticles (TiO2-SiO2-ZnO). Material and Method: TiO2-SiO2-ZnO nanoparticles were added to the A part of the M511 Platinum (Technovent Ltd., England) silicone elastomer at a rate of 2% by weight. Test specimens were produced in sizes by ASTM D412 standards for tensile strength and percent elongation, ASTM D624 for tear strength, and ASTM D2240-68 for hardness testing. For each mechanical test, 4 groups were formed together with the control group and 3 other groups to which nanoparticles were added, and a total of 132 samples were produced, 11 samples for each group (n=11), (N=132). The data of tensile strength, elongation percentage, and tear strength tests were analyzed by Shapiro Wilk's and/or Kolmogorov Smirnov/Mann Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis-H tests; for the hardness test, the values ​​in each group showed a normal distribution within themselves, hardness test was analyzed with Oneway ANOVA/Tukey HSD tests. Results: The addition of TiO2 and SiO2 to the silicone elastomer significantly increased the tensile strength compared to the other groups (p

[1]  M. Goiato,et al.  Influence of adding nanoparticles on the hardness, tear strength, and permanent deformation of facial silicone subjected to accelerated aging. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  H. Nakajima,et al.  Mechanical, antibacterial and bond strength properties of nano-titanium-enriched glass ionomer cement , 2015, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[3]  Sara M. Zayed,et al.  Effect of Surface Treated Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles on Some Mechanical Properties of Maxillofacial Silicone Elastomer , 2014, International journal of biomaterials.

[4]  L. Shao,et al.  Biomechanical properties of nano-TiO(2) addition to a medical silicone elastomer: the effect of artificial ageing. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[5]  D. Watts,et al.  Mechanical properties and bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  C. Kurtoglu,et al.  Effect of tulle on the mechanical properties of a maxillofacial silicone elastomer. , 2008, Dental materials journal.

[7]  V. Fialka-Moser,et al.  Cancer rehabilitation: particularly with aspects on physical impairments. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[8]  L. Gettleman,et al.  Effect of adhesive retention of maxillofacial prostheses. Part 2: Time and reapplication effects. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  P. Tarantili,et al.  Properties of Maxillofacial Silicone Elastomers Reinforced with Silica Powder , 1998, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[10]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Physical properties of three maxillofacial materials as a function of accelerated aging. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  J. Wolfaardt,et al.  Osseointegrated Alloplastic versus Autogenous Ear Reconstruction: Criteria for Treatment Selection , 1994, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  D J Castleberry,et al.  An assessment of recent advances in external maxillofacial materials. , 1980, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  A. Koran,et al.  Dimensional Stability of Elastomers for Maxillofacial Applications , 1979, Journal of dental research.