Surface modification of electrospun polycaprolactone nanofiber meshes by plasma treatment to enhance biological performance.

A critical aspect in the development of biomaterials is the optimization of their surface properties to achieve an adequate cell response. In the present work, electrospun polycaprolactone nanofiber meshes (NFMs) are treated by radio-frequency (RF) plasma using different gases (Ar or O(2)), power (20 or 30 W), and exposure time (5 or 10 min). Morphological and roughness analysis show topographical changes on the plasma-treated NFMs. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results indicate an increment of the oxygen-containing groups, mainly --OH and --C==O, at the plasma-treated surfaces. Accordingly, the glycerol contact angle results demonstrate a decrease in the hydrophobicity of plasma-treated meshes, particularly in the O(2)-treated ones. Three model cell lines (fibroblasts, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts) are used to study the effect of plasma treatments over the morphology, cell adhesion, and proliferation. A plasma treatment with O(2) and one with Ar are found to be the most successful for all the studied cell types. The influence of hydrophilicity and roughness of those NFMs on their biological performance is discussed. Despite the often claimed morphological similarity of NFMs to natural extracellular matrixes, their surface properties contribute substantially to the cellular performance and therefore those should be optimized.

[1]  R. Misra,et al.  Biomaterials , 2008 .

[2]  H. S. Azevedo,et al.  Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: present status and some moving trends , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[3]  Nuno M Neves,et al.  Electrospun nanostructured scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. , 2007, Nanomedicine.

[4]  Martin Schuler,et al.  Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[5]  Young Min Ju,et al.  Surface modification of biodegradable electrospun nanofiber scaffolds and their interaction with fibroblasts , 2007, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[6]  B. Größner-Schreiber,et al.  Focal adhesion contact formation by fibroblasts cultured on surface-modified dental implants: an in vitro study. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  K. Wilson,et al.  Characterisation of electrospun polystyrene scaffolds for three-dimensional in vitro biological studies. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[8]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Statistical demonstration of the relative effect of surface chemistry and roughness on human osteoblast short-term adhesion , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[9]  J. Xue,et al.  Study on hydrophilicity of polymer surfaces improved by plasma treatment , 2006 .

[10]  Dietmar W Hutmacher,et al.  Evaluation of a hybrid scaffold/cell construct in repair of high-load-bearing osteochondral defects in rabbits. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[11]  Z. Gugala,et al.  Attachment, growth, and activity of rat osteoblasts on polylactide membranes treated with various low-temperature radiofrequency plasmas. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[12]  A. Salgado,et al.  Nano- and micro-fiber combined scaffolds: A new architecture for bone tissue engineering , 2005, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[13]  A. Holländer Surface oxidation inside of macroscopic porous polymeric materials , 2005 .

[14]  Richard Tuli,et al.  Multilineage differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in a three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[15]  M. Kotaki,et al.  Guided bone regeneration membrane made of polycaprolactone/calcium carbonate composite nano-fibers. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[16]  W. Linhart,et al.  Response of primary fibroblasts and osteoblasts to plasma treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surfaces , 2005, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[17]  Dayin Hou,et al.  Surface modification of polymer nanofibres by plasma treatment , 2005 .

[18]  D. Landolt,et al.  Differential regulation of osteoblasts by substrate microstructural features. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[19]  D. Martin,et al.  Nanomedicine , 2005, BMJ.

[20]  Seeram Ramakrishna,et al.  Potential of nanofiber matrix as tissue-engineering scaffolds. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[21]  Shen‐guo Wang,et al.  Bulk and surface modifications of polylactide , 2005, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[22]  Laura A. Smith,et al.  Nano-fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2004, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[23]  Seeram Ramakrishna,et al.  Electrospun nanofiber fabrication as synthetic extracellular matrix and its potential for vascular tissue engineering. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[24]  Yuqing Wan,et al.  Characterization of surface property of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) after oxygen plasma treatment. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[25]  Won Ho Park,et al.  Electrospinning of silk fibroin nanofibers and its effect on the adhesion and spreading of normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts in vitro. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[26]  S. Ramakrishna,et al.  Characterization of neural stem cells on electrospun poly(L-lactic acid) nanofibrous scaffold , 2004, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[27]  Wan-Ju Li,et al.  Biological response of chondrocytes cultured in three-dimensional nanofibrous poly(ϵ-caprolactone) scaffolds† , 2003 .

[28]  M. Kotaki,et al.  A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites , 2003 .

[29]  Kee Woei Ng,et al.  Elastic cartilage engineering using novel scaffold architectures in combination with a biomimetic cell carrier. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[30]  L. Ambrosio,et al.  Osteoblast growth and function in porous poly epsilon -caprolactone matrices for bone repair: a preliminary study. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[31]  Xuesi Chen,et al.  Ultrafine fibers electrospun from biodegradable polymers , 2003 .

[32]  M. Heintze,et al.  Analysis of functional groups on the surface of plasma-treated carbon nanofibers , 2003, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[33]  Shen‐guo Wang,et al.  Enhanced cell affinity of poly (D,L-lactide) by combining plasma treatment with collagen anchorage. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[34]  N. Brown,et al.  Modification of the surface properties of a polypropylene (PP) film using an air dielectric barrier discharge plasma , 2002 .

[35]  Junying Chen,et al.  Plasma-surface modification of biomaterials , 2002 .

[36]  J. Gilman,et al.  Nanotechnology , 2001 .

[37]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[38]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  The relative influence of the topography and chemistry of TiAl6V4 surfaces on osteoblastic cell behaviour. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[39]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[40]  T. Kojo,et al.  Effect of surface roughness on proliferation and alkaline phosphatase expression of rat calvarial cells cultured on polystyrene. , 1999, Bone.

[41]  B. Boyan,et al.  Effect of surface roughness and composition on costochondral chondrocytes is dependent on cell maturation state , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[42]  C J Murphy,et al.  Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[43]  C. Lohmann,et al.  Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[44]  H. Lee,et al.  Interaction of Different Types of Cells on Polymer Surfaces with Wettability Gradient. , 1998, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[45]  P. Tresco,et al.  Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[46]  Y. Ikada,et al.  Blends of aliphatic polyesters. II. Hydrolysis of solution‐cast blends from poly(L‐lactide) and poly(E‐caprolactone) in phosphate‐buffered solution , 1998 .

[47]  D. Reneker,et al.  Nanometre diameter fibres of polymer, produced by electrospinning , 1996 .

[48]  Y. Ikada,et al.  Blends of aliphatic polyesters. I. Physical properties and morphologies of solution-cast blends from poly(DL-lactide) and poly(ε-caprolactone) , 1996 .

[49]  T. Groth,et al.  Studies on cell-biomaterial interaction: role of tyrosine phosphorylation during fibroblast spreading on surfaces varying in wettability. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[50]  C. Chan,et al.  Polymer surface modification by plasmas and photons , 1996 .

[51]  J. Y. Martin,et al.  Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation, matrix production, and differentiation depends on the state of cell maturation. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[52]  Jeffrey A. Hubbell,et al.  Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering , 1995, Bio/Technology.

[53]  B D Boyan,et al.  Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[54]  H Alexander,et al.  Effect of surface plasma treatment on the chemical, physical, morphological, and mechanical properties of totally absorbable bone internal fixation devices. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[55]  J. Kivilahti,et al.  Effect of surface processing on the attachment, orientation, and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium. , 1992, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[56]  C. Chu,et al.  Plasma surface modification of synthetic absorbable sutures. , 1992, Journal of applied biomaterials : an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials.

[57]  R. W. Bussian,et al.  Short-term cell-attachment rates: a surface-sensitive test of cell-substrate compatibility. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[58]  J. Forrester,et al.  Comparison of Systolic Blood Pressure Measurements by Auscultation and Visual Manometer Needle Jump , 2019, International journal of exercise science.

[59]  G L Kimmel,et al.  Aliphatic polyesters II. The degradation of poly (DL-lactide), poly (epsilon-caprolactone), and their copolymers in vivo. , 1981, Biomaterials.

[60]  Andreas Greiner,et al.  Nanoprocessing of polymers: applications in medicine, sensors, catalysis, photonics , 2005 .

[61]  T. Duc,et al.  Surface structural studies of polyethylene, polypropylene and their copolymers with ToF SIMS , 1994 .

[62]  J. H. Lee,et al.  A wettability gradient as a tool to study protein adsorption and cell adhesion on polymer surfaces. , 1993, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[63]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  Plasma surface modification of polymers for improved adhesion: a critical review , 1993 .