A Comparison of In-Class Learner Engagement Across Lecture, Problem-Based Learning, and Team Learning Using the STROBE Classroom Observation Tool

Background: Having recently introduced team learning into the preclinical medical curriculum, evidence of the relative impact of this instructional method on in-class learner engagement was sought. Purpose: To compare patterns of engagement behaviors among learners in class sessions across 3 distinct instructional methods: lecture, problem-based learning (PBL), and team learning. Methods: Trained observers used the STROBE classroom observation tool to measure learner engagement in 7 lecture, 4 PBL, and 3 team learning classrooms over a 12-month period. Proportions of different types of engagement behaviors were compared using chi-square. Results: In PBL and team learning, the amount of learner-to-learner engagement was similar and much greater than in lecture, where most engagement was of the learner-to-instructor and self-engagement types. Also, learner-to-instructor engagement appeared greater in team learning than in PBL. Conclusions: Observed engagement behaviors confirm the potential of team learning to foster engagement similar to PBL, but with greater faculty input.

[1]  Charles C. Bonwell,et al.  Using active learning in college class : a range of options for faculty , 1996 .

[2]  Anne S. Goodsell.  Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. , 1992 .

[3]  C. L. Seidel,et al.  Application of team learning in a medical physiology course. , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[4]  L. Berkson.  Problem‐based learning: have the expectations been met? , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  M. Albanese,et al.  Problem‐based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Innovation in large lectures—teaching for active learning , 1997 .

[7]  J. Colliver.  Effectiveness of Problem‐based Learning Curricula: Research and Theory , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[8]  R. Tamblyn,et al.  Problem-based learning : an approach to medical education , 1980 .

[9]  R. Kraft.  Group-Inquiry Turns Passive Students Active. , 1985 .

[10]  D. T. Vernon,et al.  Does problem‐based learning work? A meta‐analysis of evaluative research , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  L. Trevena,et al.  Self-directed learning in population health. a clinically relevant approach for medical students. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[12]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making: A longitudinal study. , 1991 .

[13]  K. Smith.  Cooperative learning: Making “groupwork” work , 1996 .

[14]  Arthur Kaufman,et al.  Implementing problem-based medical education : lessons from successful innovations , 1985 .

[15]  L. Dee Fink,et al.  Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching , 2002 .

[16]  L. Dee Fink,et al.  Designing Effective Group Activities: Lessons for Classroom Teaching and Faculty Development , 1997 .

[17]  B. Richards,et al.  An Initial Experience with “Team Learning” in Medical Education , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.