[Evolution of electrohysterogram signals synchronization according to term of pregnancy: interest for preterm labor diagnosis].

OBJECTIVES Our study focuses on the analysis of the uterine electromyogram recorded on women during pregnancy. We were interested in evaluating the synchronization of this electrical signal at various terms in order to follow evolution of synchronization as labor approaches. This study attempts to deepen our understanding of the myometrial maturation close to labor and to provide reliable parameters for improving preterm labor diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a prospective study by recording the electrical signals of physiological uterine contractions (causing no delivery) on 16 pregnant women. We then calculated the non-linear correlation coefficient h(2) to estimate synchronization between EMG signals collected for each contraction. We expressed the results by grouping synchronization values by class of term in order to study the evolution of this coefficient along gestation. This study has been approved by the ethical committee of our hospital. RESULTS Our results show a non-significant increase of the h(2) value along term. There is however a trend towards an increase of the synchronization of EMG signals as labor approaches but not enough to conclude definitively. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION With a confirmation of the increase of h(2) along term, the study of the synchronization of uterine electrical activity could be an important clue to support the notion of myometrial maturation close to labor. Synchronization analysis could also be a promising parameter for reliable diagnosis of preterm labor.

[1]  J. Terrien,et al.  Spatial analysis of uterine EMG signals: Evidence of increased in synchronization with term , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  G. Wolfs,et al.  An Electromyographic Study of the Human Uterus During Labor , 1971, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  H. Kuriyama,et al.  Specific features of smooth muscle cells recorded from the placental region of the myometrium of pregnant rats , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  F. Wendling,et al.  Des sources neuronales aux signaux EEG : modèle et interprétation des activités épileptiques , 2009 .

[5]  Brynjar Karlsson,et al.  Uterine electromyogram database and processing function interface: An open standard analysis platform for electrohysterogram signals , 2010, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[6]  S. Mansour,et al.  Uterine EMG : Experimental And Mathematical Determination Of The Relationship Between Internal And External Recordings , 1991, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Volume 13: 1991.

[7]  Sandy Rihana,et al.  Preterm labour detection by use of a biophysical marker: the uterine electrical activity , 2007, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

[8]  W. Maner,et al.  Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions. , 2007, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[9]  C. Marque,et al.  Traitement de l'électromyogramme utérin pour la caractérisation des contractions pendant la grossesse , 1999 .

[10]  William L. Maner,et al.  Identification of Human Term and Preterm Labor using Artificial Neural Networks on Uterine Electromyography Data , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  C. Marque,et al.  Uterine EMG spectral analysis and relationship to mechanical activity in pregnant monkeys , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[12]  C. Marque,et al.  Use of the electrohysterogram signal for characterization of contractions during pregnancy , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  M. Lucovnik,et al.  Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  R. Garfield,et al.  Appearance of gap junctions in the myometrium of women during labor. , 1981, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  Roberto Romero,et al.  Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth , 2008, The Lancet.

[16]  Dorothee E. Marossero,et al.  Monitoring Contractions in Obese Parturients: Electrohysterography Compared With Traditional Monitoring , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  Catherine Marque,et al.  Surveillance des grossesses à risque par électromyographie utérine , 1995 .

[18]  M. Pajntar,et al.  Electromyographic Activity of the Uterus Above the Placental Implantation Site , 1999, Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.

[19]  G. Saade,et al.  Methods and Devices for the Management of Term and Preterm Labor , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.