The Influence of Humidity, Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration, and Condensation on the Inactivation of Geobacillus stearothermophilus Spores with Hydrogen Peroxide Vapor

The study presented here examined the factors influencing the effectiveness of surface decontamination with hydrogen peroxide vapor. The impact of relative humidity and hydrogen peroxide gas concentrations was investigated and compared to a dew point analysis of these various sterilant atmospheres. For this purpose, a series of different H2O2 decontamination cycles were developed and tested for antimicrobial effectiveness using biological indicators inoculated with greater than 106 spores of Geobacillus stearothermophilus. The results indicate that an increasing concentration of hydrogen peroxide in the gas phase and higher humidity levels result in a faster inactivation of the test organisms. The higher the H2O2 gas phase concentration was, the more independent the inactivation effect from the humidity level. At lower H2O2 concentrations, the same kill was achieved with higher humidity. Subvisible condensation was found to be necessary for short inactivation times, but condensation in the visible range did not further enhance the sporicidal activity. The molecular deposition of water and hydrogen peroxide on the target surface represents the determining factor for microbial inactivation, whereas the hydrogen peroxide concentration in the gas phase is of secondary importance.

[1]  David Watling,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the condensation of hydrogen peroxide gas and water vapour as used in surface decontamination. , 2002, PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology.

[2]  C N Haas,et al.  Estimation of microbial densities from dilution count experiments , 1989, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[3]  R. Heckert,et al.  Efficacy of vaporized hydrogen peroxide against exotic animal viruses , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  M. H. McCrady,et al.  The Numerical Interpretation of Fermentation-Tube Results , 1915 .

[5]  W. G. Cochran,et al.  Estimation of bacterial densities by means of the "most probable number". , 1950, Biometrics.

[6]  Alexandra Stärk,et al.  Effect of carrier materials on the resistance of spores of Bacillus stearothermophilus to gaseous hydrogen peroxide. , 2003, PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology.

[7]  M. Alexander Most-Probable-Number Method for Microbial Populations , 1965 .

[8]  Ross A. Caputo,et al.  Design and operational qualification of a vapor-phase hydrogen peroxide Biological Indicator Evaluator Resistometer (BIER) unit , 2003 .

[9]  T. Inoue,et al.  Resistance of common environmental spores of the genus Bacillus to vapor hydrogen peroxide. , 1998, PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology.

[10]  G. Moruzzi,et al.  The expanded application of most probable number to the quantitative evaluation of extremely low microbial count. , 2006, PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology.

[11]  D. Vesley,et al.  Vapor-phase hydrogen peroxide as a surface decontaminant and sterilant , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[12]  Telework Supports General information , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics-Taiwan (ICCE-TW).

[13]  A. D. Russell,et al.  Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance , 1999, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.