The Development of a Virtual Reality Training Curriculum for Colonoscopy

Objectives: The development of a structured virtual reality (VR) training curriculum for colonoscopy using high-fidelity simulation. Background: Colonoscopy requires detailed knowledge and technical skill. Changes to working practices in recent times have reduced the availability of traditional training opportunities. Much might, therefore, be achieved by applying novel technologies such as VR simulation to colonoscopy. Scientifically developed device-specific curricula aim to maximize the yield of laboratory-based training by focusing on validated modules and linking progression to the attainment of benchmarked proficiency criteria. Methods: Fifty participants comprised of 30 novices (<10 colonoscopies), 10 intermediates (100 to 500 colonoscopies), and 10 experienced (>500 colonoscopies) colonoscopists were recruited to participate. Surrogates of proficiency, such as number of procedures undertaken, determined prospective allocation to 1 of 3 groups (novice, intermediate, and experienced). Construct validity and learning value (comparison between groups and within groups respectively) for each task and metric on the chosen simulator model determined suitability for inclusion in the curriculum. Results: Eight tasks in possession of construct validity and significant learning curves were included in the curriculum: 3 abstract tasks, 4 part-procedural tasks, and 1 procedural task. The whole-procedure task was valid for 11 metrics including the following: “time taken to complete the task” (1238, 343, and 293 s; P < 0.001) and “insertion length with embedded tip” (23.8, 3.6, and 4.9 cm; P = 0.005). Learning curves consistently plateaued at or beyond the ninth attempt. Valid metrics were used to define benchmarks, derived from the performance of the experienced cohort, for each included task. Conclusions: A comprehensive, stratified, benchmarked, whole-procedure curriculum has been developed for a modern high-fidelity VR colonoscopy simulator.

[1]  D. Rattner,et al.  Endoscopic simulator curriculum improves colonoscopy performance in novice surgical interns as demonstrated in a swine model , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  Siwan Thomas-Gibson,et al.  Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training. , 2010, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[3]  Mark Benson,et al.  Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. , 2010, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  The impact of constructive feedback on training in gastrointestinal endoscopy using high-fidelity virtual-reality simulation: a randomised controlled trial , 2009, Gut.

[5]  A. Darzi,et al.  Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2009, The British journal of surgery.

[6]  G. Maddern,et al.  A Systematic Review of Skills Transfer After Surgical Simulation Training , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[7]  K. Nnoaham,et al.  Modelling future capacity needs and spending on colonoscopy in the English bowel cancer screening programme , 2008, Gut.

[8]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  Proving the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Simulation for Training in Laparoscopic Surgery , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[9]  Erik J. Schoon,et al.  Expert and construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II endoscopy simulator for colonoscopy , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  Framework for systematic training and assessment of technical skills. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[11]  R. Reznick,et al.  Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  J. Johanson,et al.  Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  David Greenwald,et al.  Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. , 2006, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[14]  Adam Dubrowski,et al.  Teaching Surgical Skills: What Kind of Practice Makes Perfect?: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[15]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  An Evidence-Based Virtual Reality Training Program for Novice Laparoscopic Surgeons , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[16]  G. Hoff,et al.  Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group , 2005, Gut.

[17]  A. Ziv,et al.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review , 2005, Medical teacher.

[18]  Robert E Sedlack,et al.  Computer simulation training enhances patient comfort during endoscopy. , 2004, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[19]  Elizabeth Lyden,et al.  The time and financial impact of training fellows in endoscopy , 2000, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[20]  F J Carter,et al.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators , 2006, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[21]  N. Charness,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[22]  Sher ry Folsom-Meek,et al.  Human Performance , 2020, Nature.