Teaching innovation in interdisciplinary environments: Toward a design thinking syllabus

An increasing number of universities offer user-centric innovation courses based on the principles of design thinking. Lecturers combine a plethora of design thinking elements in design thinking course syllabi and thereby adopt teaching styles that range from autonomy-supportive to structured. Using a balance between these two teaching styles seems most suitable to optimally engage students and provide guidance through the innovation process. To develop a syllabus for innovation courses, we draw on best practices currently being undertaken in universities worldwide and examine 11 design thinking syllabi from different departments (Engineering, Design, Business, and Information Systems). We identify 17 common and 18 unique elements of design thinking courses and related course materials. Based on our results, we propose a design thinking syllabus that includes suggestions for course objectives, course setup, assignment design, and team composition using a balance between autonomous-support and structural teaching styles.

[1]  F. Damanpour Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[2]  Vahid Garousi,et al.  Guidelines for including the grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering , 2017, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[3]  Allen S. Lee Reviewing a manuscript for publication , 1995 .

[4]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  A Human-Centric Approach to Digital Innovation Projects in Health Care: Learnings from Applying Design Thinking , 2018, PACIS.

[5]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[6]  A. Pouloudi,et al.  Stakeholder identification in inter-organizational systems: gaining insights for drug use management systems , 1997 .

[7]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  The Platform Owner’s Challenge to Capture Value – Insights from a Business-to-Business IT Platform , 2017, ICIS 2017.

[8]  M. Elmquist,et al.  Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment , 2016 .

[9]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience , 2011, Design Issues.

[10]  C. Meinel,et al.  Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in Education. , 2012 .

[11]  Johannes I.M. Halman,et al.  Platform driven development of product families: Linking theory with practice , 2001 .

[12]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[13]  J. Reeve,et al.  What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. , 2006 .

[14]  F. Dochy,et al.  The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. , 2009, The British journal of educational psychology.

[15]  Charles J. Petrie,et al.  How Deutsche Bank's IT Division Used Design Thinking to Achieve Customer Proximity , 2016, MIS Q. Executive.

[16]  Susan Gasson,et al.  Using a grounded theory approach to study online collaboration behaviors , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[18]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[19]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Benchmarking new product performance:: Results of the best practices study , 1998 .

[20]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  From generative fit to generative capacity: exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[21]  Sara L. Beckman,et al.  Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking , 2007 .

[22]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Evaluations in the Science of the Artificial - Reconsidering the Build-Evaluate Pattern in Design Science Research , 2012, DESRIST.

[23]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Service Innovation Viewed Through a Service-Dominant Logic Lens: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Analysis , 2011 .

[24]  R. Delgado Storytelling for Oppositionists and Others: A Plea for Narrative , 1989 .

[25]  Charles J. Petrie,et al.  From Palaces to Yurts: Why Requirements Engineering Needs Design Thinking , 2013, IEEE Internet Comput..

[26]  Ulla Johansson-Sköldberg,et al.  Design Thinking: Past, Present and Possible Futures , 2013 .

[27]  Colin Ware,et al.  Visual Thinking for Design , 2008 .

[28]  Donald A. Schön Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[29]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  Design Thinking and Design Management: A Research and Practice Perspective , 2009 .

[30]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Managing User Involvement in Service Innovation , 2003 .

[31]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  The Influence of Agile Practices on Performance in Software Engineering Teams: A Subgroup Perspective , 2018, SIGMIS-CPR.

[32]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  The Business Model Navigator: 55 Models That Will Revolutionise Your Business , 2014 .

[33]  E. Deci,et al.  Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. , 2010 .

[34]  J. Reeve Why Teachers Adopt a Controlling Motivating Style Toward Students and How They Can Become More Autonomy Supportive , 2009 .

[35]  Matthias Herterich,et al.  Design Thinking Methods for Service Innovation - A Delphi Study - , 2018, PACIS.

[36]  Tobias Bachmeier,et al.  Business Model Generation A Handbook For Visionaries Game Changers And Challengers , 2016 .

[37]  Jörgen Sandberg,et al.  Generating Research Questions Through Problematization , 2011 .

[38]  Rory Burke,et al.  Project Management: Planning and Control , 1994 .

[39]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Video Game Design in the MBA Curriculum: An Experiential Learning Approach for Teaching Design Thinking , 2011, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[40]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[41]  Bill Buxton,et al.  Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design , 2007 .

[42]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[43]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[44]  Pamela L. Alreck,et al.  The Survey Research Handbook , 1984 .

[45]  E. Skinner,et al.  Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. , 1993 .

[46]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[47]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  An Instrument to Assess Adults' Orientations toward Control versus Autonomy with Children: Reflections on Intrinsic Motivation and Perceived Competence. , 1981 .

[48]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Ethnography: Principles in Practice (Book). , 1984 .