Selection Conflicts, Gene Expression, and Codon Usage Trends in Yeast

Synonymous codon usage in yeast appears to be influenced by natural selection on gene expression, as well as regional variation in compositional bias. Because of the large number of potential targets of selection (i.e., most of the codons in the genome) and presumed small selection coefficients, codon usage is an excellent model for studying factors that limit the effectiveness of selection. We use factor analysis to identify major trends in codon usage for 5836 genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The primary factor is strongly correlated with gene expression, consistent with the model that a subset of codons allows for more efficient translation. The secondary factor is very strongly correlated with third codon position GC content and probably reflects regional variation in compositional bias. We find that preferred codon usage decreases in the face of three potential limitations on the effectiveness of selection: reduced recombination rate, increased gene length, and reduced intergenic spacing. All three patterns are consistent with the Hill–Robertson effect (reduced effectiveness of selection among linked targets). A reduction in gene expression in closely spaced genes may also reflect selection conflicts due to antagonistic pleiotropy.

[1]  J. Hey,et al.  The effects of mutation and natural selection on codon bias in the genes of Drosophila. , 1994, Genetics.

[2]  G. Piganeau,et al.  Hill-Robertson interference is a minor determinant of variations in codon bias across Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[3]  J. Hey,et al.  Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila. , 2002, Genetics.

[4]  M. Gouy,et al.  Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. , 1982, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Relationship of codon bias to mRNA concentration and protein length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Yeast.

[6]  Etsuko N. Moriyama,et al.  Codon Usage Bias and tRNA Abundance in Drosophila , 1997, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[7]  F. Wright.  The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. , 1990, Gene.

[8]  P. Sharp,et al.  Codon usage and gene expression level in Dictyostelium discoideum: highly expressed genes do 'prefer' optimal codons. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  Paul M. Sharp,et al.  Codon usage in Caenorhabditis elegans: delineation of translational selection and mutational biases , 1994, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  John A Birdsell,et al.  Integrating genomics, bioinformatics, and classical genetics to study the effects of recombination on genome evolution. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  P. Brown,et al.  Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. , 1997, Science.

[12]  M. Aguadé,et al.  Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. , 1999, Genetics.

[13]  R. Paro,et al.  Multi-author Review¶Epigenetic control of transcription¶Introduction: the genetics of epigenetics , 1998, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[14]  J. Gillespie.  Genetic drift in an infinite population. The pseudohitchhiking model. , 2000, Genetics.

[15]  T. Ohta.  Slightly Deleterious Mutant Substitutions in Evolution , 1973, Nature.

[16]  J. Bennetzen,et al.  Codon selection in yeast. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  L. Duret,et al.  Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  M. Kreitman,et al.  Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection. , 2002, Genetics.

[19]  T. Ikemura.  Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  Wen-Hsiung Li.  Models of nearly neutral mutations with particular implications for nonrandom usage of synonymous codons , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[21]  H. Akashi.  Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. , 1994, Genetics.

[22]  S. Schaeffer,et al.  Natural selection and the frequency distributions of "silent" DNA polymorphism in Drosophila. , 1997, Genetics.

[23]  H. Akashi,et al.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. , 1995, Genetics.

[24]  G. McVean,et al.  The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation. , 2000, Genetics.

[25]  P. Sharp,et al.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  A. West,et al.  Insulators and boundaries: versatile regulatory elements in the eukaryotic genome. , 2001, Science.

[27]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Science.

[28]  J. Hey,et al.  Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[29]  T. Ikemura.  Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. , 1985, Molecular biology and evolution.

[30]  L. Duret,et al.  Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Etsuko N. Moriyama,et al.  Gene length and codon usage bias in Drosophila melanogaster, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli , 1998, Nucleic Acids Res..

[32]  D C Shields,et al.  "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[33]  L. Duret,et al.  Statistical analysis of vertebrate sequences reveals that long genes are scarce in GC-rich isochores , 1995, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[34]  P. Sharp,et al.  Synonymous codon usage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1991, Yeast.

[35]  P. Brown,et al.  Global mapping of meiotic recombination hotspots and coldspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  J. Felsenstein.  The evolutionary advantage of recombination. , 1974, Genetics.

[37]  A. Eyre-Walker,et al.  Patterns of Base Composition Within the Genes of Drosophila melanogaster , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[38]  B. Barrell,et al.  Life with 6000 Genes , 1996, Science.

[39]  G Bernardi,et al.  The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates. , 1985, Science.

[40]  M. Kreitman,et al.  The Nonrandom Location of Synonymous Codons Suggests That Reading Frame-Independent Forces Have Patterned Codon Preferences , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[41]  C. Kurland,et al.  Growth rate-optimised tRNA abundance and codon usage. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  A. Pavesi,et al.  Transfer RNA gene redundancy and translational selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  Adam Eyre-Walker,et al.  Recombination and mammalian genome evolution , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  G Bernardi,et al.  Isochores and the evolutionary genomics of vertebrates. , 2000, Gene.

[45]  S. Elgin,et al.  Chromatin organization and transcriptional control of gene expression in Drosophila. , 2000, Gene.

[46]  R. Kliman.  Recent Selection on Synonymous Codon Usage in Drosophila , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.