Effects of task interdependence on the relationship between helping behavior and group performance.

The authors examine whether task interdependence moderates the relationship between the helping form of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and group performance. In a laboratory study, 62 groups with 3 members each completed a card-sequencing activity in which the level of task interdependence among group members was manipulated. Independent evaluators assessed helping by viewing videotapes of the groups' interactions during the sequencing activities. Performance was measured as a combined function of group speed and accuracy. Two prior field studies reported contradictory results regarding the impact of helping on group performance. Results from this study suggest that task interdependence may explain these results, and that the relationship between helping and group performance depends on the level of task interdependence required of group members.

[1]  L. James.  Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[2]  Onne Janssen,et al.  Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation , 2003 .

[3]  William G. Dyer,et al.  Team Building: Current Issues and New Alternatives , 1994 .

[4]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Sales Unit Effectiveness , 1994 .

[5]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[7]  J. L. Crawford,et al.  Predecisional information seeking and subsequent conformity in the social influence process. , 1972 .

[8]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[9]  R. Liden,et al.  Task Interdependence as a Moderator of the Relation Between Group Control and Performance , 1997 .

[10]  David Mazursky.  Temporal instability in the salience of behavioral intention predictors , 1990 .

[11]  D. Organ.  Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. , 1988 .

[12]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  Organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing perspectives of supervisors and subordinates across four international samples , 1999 .

[13]  R. Mahurin,et al.  Application of Hick's Law of Response Speed in Alzheimer and Parkinson Diseases , 1993, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Attribution of the "causes" of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. , 1975 .

[15]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[16]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings , 1995 .

[17]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[18]  Larry J. Williams,et al.  Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work. , 1996 .

[19]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[20]  Elizabeth C. Ravlin,et al.  The Design and Activation of Self-Regulating Work Groups , 1987 .

[21]  W. Borman,et al.  Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance , 1993 .

[22]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research , 2000 .

[23]  John R. Deckop,et al.  Getting More Than You Pay For: Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Pay-For-Performance Plans , 1999 .

[24]  Brian P. Niehoff,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Their Relationship to Organizational Effectiveness , 2000 .

[25]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[26]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  Can Group Self-Management Mean a Loss of Personal Control: Triangulating a Paradox , 1986 .

[27]  Donal E. Carlston,et al.  The recall and use of traits and events in social inference processes , 1980 .

[28]  J. P. Near,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR: ITS NATURE AND ANTECEDENTS , 1983 .

[29]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Cooperation, Competition, and Team Performance: Toward a Contingency Approach , 2003 .

[30]  Hal B. Gregersen,et al.  Task interdependence and extrarole behavior : a test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility , 1991 .

[31]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[32]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1997 .

[33]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: exploring the impact of task interdependence. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[35]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[36]  Elizabeth Wolfe Morrison,et al.  Role Definitions and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Importance of the Employee's Perspective , 1994 .

[37]  Gerben S. van der Vegt,et al.  Effects of Perceived Skill Dissimilarity and Task Interdependence on Helping in Work Teams , 2005 .

[38]  Martin M. Greller,et al.  Sources of feedback: A preliminary investigation , 1975 .

[39]  T. Wall,et al.  Outcomes of Autonomous Workgroups: A Long-Term Field Experiment , 1986 .

[40]  Dennis W. Organ,et al.  COGNITIVE VERSUS AFFECTIVE DETERMINANTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR , 1989 .

[41]  E. Thomas.  Effects of Facilitative Role Interdependence on Group Functioning , 1957 .

[42]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  Comparing Correlations Based on Individual-Level and Aggregated Data , 1993 .

[43]  Daniel J. Brass.  Technology and the structuring of jobs: Employee satisfaction, performance, and influence , 1985 .

[44]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Quantity and Quality of Work Group Performance , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  D. Krebs,et al.  Altruism: An examination of the concept and a review of the literature. , 1970 .

[46]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  The Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams: A Quasi-Experiment , 1994 .

[47]  Robert L. Hamblin,et al.  Interdependence, differential rewarding, and productivity. , 1963 .

[48]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Attributions of the "causes" of group performance as an alternative explanation of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and organizational performance. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Informational Dissimilarity and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Intrateam Interdependence and Team Identification , 2003 .

[50]  K. Murphy.  Personnel Selection in Organizations , 1992 .

[51]  Daniel J. Koys.  The Effects of Employee Satisfaction, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Turnover on Organizational Effectiveness , 2001 .

[52]  P. Bobko.  Removing Assumptions of Bipolarity: Towards Variation and Circularity , 1985 .

[53]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[54]  J. Bloodgood,et al.  Citizenship Behavior and The Creation of Social Capital in Organizations , 2002 .

[55]  M. Kiggundu.  Task interdependence and job design: test of a theory. , 1983, Organizational behavior and human performance.