Efficiency of B-mode Ultrasound and Strain Elastography in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of ultrasonography (US), especially when combined with strain elastography (SE), in differentiating between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes (LNs). Methods Forty-one LNs were examined by B-mode US, power Doppler US, and SE. The following imaging features were analyzed: shape, echogenicity, echogenic hilum, calcification, intranodal vascular pattern, elasticity scores (5 categories), and strain ratio. The average strain ratio was calculated as the mean strain of the adjacent sternocleidomastoid muscle divided by the mean strain of the target LN. The results of the US and SE features were compared with the histopathologic findings. Results The imaging features that were significantly associated with malignant LNs were an increased short-to-long axis diameter ratio, abnormal or absence of hilum, microcalcification, type 2-3-4 vascularity, 3-4-5 elasticity scores, and a high level of strain ratio (P < 0.05). The cutoff value of the strain index was detected as 1.18. According to this, there was a significant difference (P = 0.004) in the strain index between benign and malignant LNs. Conclusions Strain elastography is useful in differentiating between benign and malignant cervical LNs, thereby informing decisions to perform a biopsy and/or surgery, and facilitating follow-up.

[1]  D. Yousem,et al.  Central nodal necrosis and extracapsular neoplastic spread in cervical lymph nodes: MR imaging versus CT. , 1992, Radiology.

[2]  M. Badawy,et al.  Can ultrasound elastography distinguish metastatic from reactive lymph nodes in patients with primary head and neck cancers , 2014 .

[3]  Ying Xiao,et al.  Ultrasound elastography: Its potential role in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[4]  Chi-Te Wang,et al.  Real-time ultrasound elastography: an assessment of enlarged cervical lymph nodes , 2013, European Radiology.

[5]  D. Hahn,et al.  Multivariate analysis of the adjustment of the colour Duplex unit for the differential diagnosis of lymph node alterations , 1999, European Radiology.

[6]  S. Dudea,et al.  Ultrasonography of superficial lymph nodes: benign vs. malignant. , 2012, Medical ultrasonography.

[7]  Tatsuya Higashi,et al.  Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography--initial experience. , 2007, Radiology.

[8]  Katsuhide Ito,et al.  Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  K. Ryu,et al.  Cervical Lymph Node Imaging Reporting and Data System for Ultrasound of Cervical Lymphadenopathy: A Pilot Study. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  A. Ahuja,et al.  Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy: is power Doppler sonography routinely indicated? , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[12]  Hui Wang,et al.  Value of ultrasound elastography in assessment of enlarged cervical lymph nodes. , 2012, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.