Generalized likelihood ratio test for modified replacement model in hyperspectral imaging detection

Abstract The replacement model, which assumes that the abundances sum up to one, is often advocated for subpixel target detection in hyperspectral imaging, and various detection schemes based on this model have been developed in the literature. However, in practical situations, this unitary constraint may be too strong due to possible attenuation of the target bidirectional reflectance distribution function, signature mismatches or impediments in the radiometric corrections. The aim of this paper is to improve the replacement-model detection algorithms by relaxing this unitary constraint. To this end, we propose to consider a modified replacement model. One step and two steps generalized likelihood ratio tests are developed for this new model and compared to standard solutions through numerical simulations. An application to real data shows the improvement offered by the proposed approach.

[1]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Orthogonal subspace projection (OSP) revisited: a comprehensive study and analysis , 2005, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  Da-Wen Sun,et al.  Hyperspectral imaging for food quality analysis and control , 2010 .

[3]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Kernel RX-algorithm: a nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  James Theiler,et al.  Clustering to improve matched filter detection of weak gas plumes in hyperspectral thermal imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Philippe Gamet,et al.  HYPXIM — A hyperspectral satellite defined for science, security and defence users , 2011, 2011 3rd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS).

[6]  Daniel R. Fuhrmann,et al.  A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector , 1992 .

[7]  N. S. Trahair,et al.  Evaluation of apparent surface reflectance estimation methodologies , 1995 .

[8]  Robert Koprowski Processing of Hyperspectral Medical Images: Applications in Dermatology Using Matlab® , 2016 .

[9]  Vincent Roy Hybrid algorithm for hyperspectral target detection , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Stefania Matteoli,et al.  Hyperspectral Airborne “Viareggio 2013 Trial” Data Collection for Detection Algorithm Assessment , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Eustace L. Dereniak,et al.  Hyperspectral imaging for astronomy and space surviellance , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[12]  Anthony B. Hill,et al.  Mine detection experiments using hyperspectral sensors , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  E. J. Kelly An Adaptive Detection Algorithm , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[14]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  Adaptive subspace detectors , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[15]  François Vincent,et al.  One-Step Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test for Subpixel Target Detection in Hyperspectral Imaging , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[17]  W. Verhoef,et al.  Simulation of hyperspectral and directional radiance images using coupled biophysical and atmospheric radiative transfer models , 2003 .

[18]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Is there a best hyperspectral detection algorithm? , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.