Effective CRISPRa-mediated control of gene expression in bacteria must overcome strict target site requirements

In bacterial systems, CRISPR-Cas transcriptional activation (CRISPRa) has the potential to dramatically expand our ability to regulate gene expression, but we currently lack a complete understanding of the rules for designing effective guide RNA target sites. We have identified multiple features of bacterial promoters that impose stringent requirements on bacterial CRISPRa target sites. Most importantly, we found that shifting a gRNA target site by 2-4 bases along the DNA target can cause a nearly complete loss in activity. The loss in activity can be rescued by shifting the target site 10-11 bases, corresponding to one full helical turn. Practically, our results suggest that it will be challenging to find a gRNA target site with an appropriate PAM sequence at precisely the right position at arbitrary genes of interest. To overcome this limitation, we demonstrate that a dCas9 variant with expanded PAM specificity allows activation of promoters that cannot be activated by S. pyogenes dCas9. These results provide a roadmap for future engineering efforts to further expand and generalize the scope of bacterial CRISPRa.

[1]  David R. Liu,et al.  Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity , 2018, Nature.

[2]  J. Carothers,et al.  Synthetic CRISPR-Cas gene activators for transcriptional reprogramming in bacteria , 2018, Nature Communications.

[3]  Max A. Horlbeck,et al.  Genome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation , 2014, Cell.

[4]  Baojun Wang,et al.  Engineered CRISPRa enables programmable eukaryote-like gene activation in bacteria , 2019, Nature Communications.

[5]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  Dimeric lac repressors exhibit phase-dependent co-operativity. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  Kevin L. Griffith,et al.  A comprehensive alanine scanning mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli transcriptional activator SoxS: identifying amino acids important for DNA binding and transcription activation. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  J. Keasling,et al.  Engineering Cellular Metabolism , 2016, Cell.

[8]  Alexandro E. Trevino,et al.  Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex , 2014, Nature.

[9]  J. Imlay,et al.  The regulation and role of the periplasmic copper, zinc superoxide dismutase of Escherichia coli , 1999, Molecular microbiology.

[10]  F. Rojo Repression of Transcription Initiation in Bacteria , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  Chase L. Beisel,et al.  Deciphering, Communicating, and Engineering the CRISPR PAM. , 2017, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Francisco Bolivar,et al.  Engineering Escherichia coli to overproduce aromatic amino acids and derived compounds , 2014, Microbial Cell Factories.

[13]  Peter D. Karp,et al.  The EcoCyc database: reflecting new knowledge about Escherichia coli K-12 , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  N. Perrimon,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Cas9 Activators Across Multiple Species , 2016, Nature Methods.

[15]  U. Alon,et al.  A comprehensive library of fluorescent transcriptional reporters for Escherichia coli , 2006, Nature Methods.

[16]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Principles of genetic circuit design , 2014, Nature Methods.

[17]  C. Gross,et al.  Multiple sigma subunits and the partitioning of bacterial transcription space. , 2003, Annual review of microbiology.

[18]  Ishita M. Shah,et al.  Novel protein--protein interaction between Escherichia coli SoxS and the DNA binding determinant of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit: SoxS functions as a co-sigma factor and redeploys RNA polymerase from UP-element-containing promoters to SoxS-dependent promoters during oxidative stress. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression , 2013, Cell.

[20]  Virgil A Rhodius,et al.  Regulon and promoter analysis of the E. coli heat-shock factor, sigma32, reveals a multifaceted cellular response to heat stress. , 2006, Genes & development.

[21]  Araceli M. Huerta,et al.  Genome-Wide Identification of Transcription Start Sites, Promoters and Transcription Factor Binding Sites in E. coli , 2009, PloS one.

[22]  Meghdad Hajimorad,et al.  BglBrick vectors and datasheets: A synthetic biology platform for gene expression , 2011, Journal of biological engineering.

[23]  D. Clark,et al.  Regulation of the ldhA gene, encoding the fermentative lactate dehydrogenase of Escherichia coli. , 2001, Microbiology.

[24]  J. Gore,et al.  Random sequences rapidly evolve into de novo promoters , 2018, Nature Communications.

[25]  Lei S. Qi,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 in Genome Editing and Beyond. , 2016, Annual review of biochemistry.

[26]  U. Alon,et al.  A Genome-Wide Analysis of Promoter-Mediated Phenotypic Noise in Escherichia coli , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[27]  A. Kolb,et al.  The CRP–cAMP complex and downregulation of the glnAp2 promoter provides a novel regulatory linkage between carbon metabolism and nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[28]  C. Gross,et al.  Conserved and Variable Functions of the σE Stress Response in Related Genomes , 2005, PLoS biology.

[29]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Diversity and evolution of class 2 CRISPR–Cas systems , 2017, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[30]  R. Weiss,et al.  CRISPR transcriptional repression devices and layered circuits in mammalian cells , 2014, Nature Methods.

[31]  N. M. Kredich,et al.  DNA sequences of the cysK regions of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli and linkage of the cysK regions to ptsH , 1988, Journal of bacteriology.

[32]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[34]  S. Busby,et al.  Spacing requirements for Class I transcription activation in bacteria are set by promoter elements , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  S. Busby,et al.  Activation and repression of transcription initiation in bacteria. , 2001, Essays in biochemistry.

[36]  T. D. Schneider,et al.  Interdependence of the position and orientation of SoxS binding sites in the transcriptional activation of the class I subset of Escherichia coli superoxide‐inducible promoters , 1999, Molecular microbiology.

[37]  James M. Carothers,et al.  Digital logic circuits in yeast with CRISPR-dCas9 NOR gates , 2017, Nature Communications.

[38]  N. Perrimon,et al.  Highly-efficient Cas9-mediated transcriptional programming , 2015, Nature Methods.