The role of latency in the validity of AR simulation

It is extremely challenging to run controlled studies comparing multiple Augmented Reality (AR) systems. We use an AR simulation approach, in which a Virtual Reality (VR) system is used to simulate multiple AR systems. To investigate the validity of this approach, in our first experiment we carefully replicated a well-known study by Ellis et al. using our simulator, obtaining comparable results. We include a discussion on general issues we encountered with replicating a prior study. In our second experiment further exploring the validity of AR simulation, we investigated the effects of simulator latency on the results from experiments conducted in an AR simulator. We found simulator latency to have a significant effect on 3D tracing, however there was no interaction between simulator latency and artificial latency. Based on the results from these two experiments, we conclude that simulator latency is not inconsequential in determining task performance. Simulating visual registration is not sufficient to simulate the overall perception of registration errors in an AR system. We also need to keep simulator latency at a minimum. We discuss the impact of these results on the use of the AR simulation approach.

[1]  Tobias Höllerer,et al.  Simulation of Augmented Reality Systems in Purely Virtual Environments , 2009, 2009 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[2]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Immersion in desktop virtual reality , 1997, UIST '97.

[3]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Separating the effects of level of immersion and 3D interaction techniques , 2006, VRST '06.

[4]  Kellogg S. Booth,et al.  The importance of accurate VR head registration on skilled motor performance , 2006, Graphics Interface.

[5]  Stephen DiVerdi,et al.  Evaluating Display Types for AR Selection and Annotation , 2007, 2007 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[6]  Tobias Höllerer,et al.  A replication study testing the validity of AR simulation in VR for controlled experiments , 2009, 2009 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[7]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Simulated augmented reality windshield display as a cognitive mapping aid for elder driver navigation , 2009, CHI.

[8]  John C. Hart,et al.  The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment , 1992, CACM.

[9]  Tobias Höllerer,et al.  Evaluating the effects of tracker reliability and field of view on a target following task in augmented reality , 2009, VRST '09.

[10]  Deborah Hix,et al.  The Effects of Text Drawing Styles, Background Textures, and Natural Lighting on Text Legibility in Outdoor Augmented Reality , 2006, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Virtual Reality: How Much Immersion Is Enough? , 2007, Computer.

[12]  Bernard D. Adelstein,et al.  Factors influencing operator interaction with virtual objects viewed via head-mounted see-through displays: viewing conditions and rendering latency , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE 1997 Annual International Symposium on Virtual Reality.

[13]  Dennis Proffitt,et al.  Quantifying immersion in virtual reality , 1997, SIGGRAPH.