Walking the tightrope: Expectations and standards in personal genomics

[1]  Natalie de Souza.  Genomics: The ENCODE project , 2012, Nature Methods.

[2]  G. Testa,et al.  Consuming genomes: scientific and social innovation in direct-to-consumer genetic testing , 2012 .

[3]  C. McBride,et al.  Association between health-service use and multiplex genetic testing , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[4]  L. McGoey.  Strategic unknowns: towards a sociology of ignorance , 2012 .

[5]  E. Lander,et al.  The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  G Lippi,et al.  Direct‐to‐consumer testing: more risks than opportunities , 2011, International journal of clinical practice.

[7]  N. Schork,et al.  Genomic information as a behavioral health intervention: can it work? , 2011, Personalized medicine.

[8]  Lawrence Busch,et al.  Standards: Recipes for Reality , 2011 .

[9]  A. Cambon-Thomsen,et al.  Genetic Testing and Common Disorders: How to Assess Relevance and Possibilities , 2011 .

[10]  Sjoerd Bakker,et al.  Arenas of expectations for hydrogen technologies , 2011 .

[11]  Simin Liu,et al.  Building Genetic Scores to Predict Risk of Complex Diseases in Humans: Is It Possible? , 2010, Diabetes.

[12]  W. Hall,et al.  Being More Realistic about the Public Health Impact of Genomic Medicine , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[13]  M. Richards.  Reading the runes of my genome: a personal exploration of retail genetics , 2010 .

[14]  Michelle L. McGowan,et al.  Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users , 2010, New genetics and society.

[15]  A. Loconto,et al.  Standards, techno-economic networks, and playing fields: Performing the global market economy , 2010 .

[16]  Sivan Tamir.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: ethical-legal perspectives and practical considerations. , 2010, Medical law review.

[17]  Nancy R Cook,et al.  Association between a literature-based genetic risk score and cardiovascular events in women. , 2010, JAMA.

[18]  Richard R Sharp,et al.  Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[19]  M. Khoury,et al.  Personal utility and genomic information: Look before you leap , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[20]  J. Witte,et al.  The Scientific Foundation for Personal Genomics: Recommendations from a National Institutes of Health–Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Multidisciplinary Workshop , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[21]  Tao Wang,et al.  Social Networkers' Attitudes Toward Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing , 2009, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[22]  Linda Avey,et al.  A Pragmatic Consideration of Ethical Issues Relating to Personal Genomics , 2009, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[23]  C. Groves.  Nanotechnology, Contingency and Finitude , 2009 .

[24]  M. Tomasson.  Legal, ethical, and conceptual bottlenecks to the development of useful genomic tests. , 2009, Annals of health law.

[25]  Amy L. McGuire,et al.  An unwelcome side effect of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: raiding the medical commons. , 2008, JAMA.

[26]  M. Wadman.  Gene-testing firms face legal battle , 2008, Nature.

[27]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[28]  Francis S Collins,et al.  The genome gets personal--almost. , 2008, JAMA.

[29]  Muin J Khoury,et al.  A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[30]  Londa Schiebinger,et al.  Agnotology : the making and unmaking of ignorance , 2008 .

[31]  Nik Brown,et al.  Shifting Tenses: Reconnecting Regimes of Truth and Hope , 2007 .

[32]  Barbara Adam,et al.  Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics , 2007 .

[33]  Gail Javitt,et al.  ASHG Statement* on Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in the United States , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  Javier Lezaun,et al.  Creating a New Object of Government , 2006 .

[35]  Mads Borup,et al.  The sociology of expectations in science and technology , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[36]  P. Palladino,et al.  Between truth and hope: on Parkinson’s disease, neurotransplantation and the production of the ‘self’ , 2005 .

[37]  Reed Tuckson,et al.  Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society , 2005 .

[38]  D. Gamota,et al.  Anticipatory Standards and the Commercialization of Nanotechnology , 2003 .

[39]  David Ahlstrom,et al.  Technology assessment: a socio-cognitive perspective , 1997 .

[40]  T. Porter,et al.  Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life , 1996 .