Numerical parametric study on CO2 capture by indirect thermal swing adsorption

Abstract Post-combustion CO 2 capture remains one of the most-challenging issue to lower CO 2 emissions of existing power plants or heavy industry installations because of strong economy and energy efficiency aspects. The major issue comes from CO 2 dilution (4% for NGCC and 14% for PC) and the high flow rates to be treated. Furthermore, CO 2 purity has to be higher than 95% with recovery at 90%, to match the transportation/injection requirements. The MEA absorption process remains the reference today but its energy consumption (about 3 MJ/kg CO2 ) and the amine consumption are still challenging drawbacks. The interest of CO 2 capture by indirect TSA (Temperature Swing Adsorption) was demonstrated experimentally in a previous work. The aim of this paper is to present the results of a numerical parametric study. Two main parameters are explored: the desorption temperature (100–200 °C) and the purge flow rate (0.1–0.5 Ndm 3  min −1 ). Four performance indicators are evaluated: CO 2 purity, recovery, productivity and specific energy consumption. Results show that purity above 95% can be achieved. Keeping the 95% target, it is possible to achieve recovery at 81% with productivity at 57.7 g CO2 /kg ads  h and a specific energy consumption of 3.23 MJ/kg CO2 , which is less than for the reference MEA process. Comparison with other adsorption processes exhibits that this process has good potential especially since some improvements are still expected from further research.

[1]  F. Meunier,et al.  Influence of the Presence of CO2 in the Feed of an Indirect Heating TSA Process for VOC Removal , 2003 .

[2]  Francis Meunier,et al.  Carbon dioxide capture by indirect thermal swing adsorption using 13X zeolite , 2006 .

[3]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Effect of process parameters on power requirements of vacuum swing adsorption technology for CO2 capture from flue gas , 2008 .

[4]  Tatsuo Kabata,et al.  Technology for removing carbon dioxide from power plant flue gas by the physical adsorption method , 1996 .

[5]  Yu Wang,et al.  Adsorption Equilibrium of Carbon Dioxide and Water Vapor on Zeolites 5A and 13X and Silica Gel: Pure Components , 2009 .

[6]  Francis Meunier,et al.  Experimental Investigation on CO2 Post−Combustion Capture by Indirect Thermal Swing Adsorption Using 13X and 5A Zeolites , 2008 .

[7]  M. LeVan,et al.  Adsorption Equilibrium of Binary Mixtures of Carbon Dioxide and Water Vapor on Zeolites 5A and 13X , 2010 .

[8]  F. Meunier,et al.  Temperature Swing Adsorption Process with Indirect Cooling and Heating , 2002 .

[9]  Kee-Kahb Koo,et al.  CO2 recovery from flue gas by PSA process using activated carbon , 2001 .

[10]  G. Versteeg,et al.  CO2 capture from power plants. Part I: A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine , 2007 .

[11]  Cheng-Tung Chou,et al.  Carbon dioxide recovery by vacuum swing adsorption , 2004 .

[12]  R. T. Yang,et al.  Comparison of Activated Carbon and Zeolite 13X for CO2 Recovery from Flue-Gas by Pressure Swing Adsorption , 1995 .

[13]  Nabil Tlili,et al.  Carbon dioxide capture and recovery by means of TSA and/or VSA , 2009 .

[14]  Cecilia Askham Nyland 8th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8) , 2006 .

[15]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Capture of CO2 from high humidity flue gas by vacuum swing adsorption with zeolite 13X , 2008 .

[16]  James A. Ritter,et al.  Stripping PSA cycles for CO2 recovery from flue gas at high temperature using a hydrotalcite-like adsorbent , 2006 .

[17]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Optimization of Pressure Swing Adsorption and Fractionated Vacuum Pressure Swing Adsorption Processes for CO2 Capture , 2005 .

[18]  F. Meunier,et al.  Adsorption of gas mixtures in TSA adsorbers under various heat removal conditions , 2004 .

[19]  Armin D. Ebner,et al.  New Pressure Swing Adsorption Cycles for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration , 2005 .

[20]  Yeong-Koo Yeo,et al.  Optimal operation of the pressure swing adsorption (PSA) process for CO2 recovery , 2003 .

[21]  Mohamed Kanniche,et al.  Screening of flowsheet modifications for an efficient monoethanolamine (MEA) based post-combustion CO2 capture , 2011 .

[22]  Soon-Haeng Cho,et al.  Numerical Analysis on the Power Consumption of the PSA Process for Recovering CO2 from Flue Gas , 2002 .

[23]  Takanori Suzuki,et al.  Recovery of Carbon Dioxide from Stack Gas by Piston-Driven Ultra-Rapid PSA , 1997 .