Application of transonic codes to aeroelastic modeling of airfoils including active controls

A study is performed using aeroelastic modeling to investigate the stability behavior of airfoils in small-disturbance transonic flow. Two conventional airfoils, NACA 64.A006 and NACA 64A010, and a supercritical airfoil, MBB A-3, are considered. Three sets of unsteady aerodynamic data are computed using three different transonic codes (LTRAN2-NLR, LTRAN2-HI, and USTS) for comparison purposes. Stability results obtained using a constant matrix, state-space, aeroelastic model are presented in a root-locus format. Use of the state-space model is demonstrated through application to flutter suppression using active controls. Aeroelastic effects due to simple, constant gain, partial feedback, control laws that utilize displacement, velocity, and acceleration sensing are studied using a variety of control gains. Calculations are also performed using linear subsonic aerodynamic theory to reveal the differences between including and not including transonic effects in the aeroelastic model. Aeroelastic stability behavior of these airfoils is physically interpreted and discussed in detail.

[1]  T. Y. Yang,et al.  Viscous effects on transonic airfoil stability and response , 1986 .

[2]  John T. Batina.  Unsteady Transonic Flow Calculations for Two-Dimensional Canard-Wing Configurations , 1986 .

[3]  R. Vepa.  Finite state modeling of aeroelastic systems , 1977 .

[4]  John W. Edwards,et al.  Active Flutter Control Using Generalized Unsteady Aerodynamic Theory , 1978 .

[5]  R. Houwink,et al.  Results of an improved version of LTRAN2 for computing unsteady airloads on airfoils oscillating in transonic flow , 1979 .

[6]  I. Abel,et al.  An analytical technique for predicting the characteristics of a flexible wing equipped with an active flutter-suppression system and comparison with wind-tunnel data , 1979 .

[7]  Robert M. Bennett,et al.  Time-marching transonic flutter solutions including angle-of-attack effects , 1983 .

[8]  T. Y. Yang,et al.  Transonic flutter and response analyses of two 3-degree-of-freedom airfoils , 1982 .

[9]  Kristin A. Hessenius,et al.  Validation of LTRAN2-HI by comparison with unsteady transonic experiment , 1982 .

[10]  T. Yang,et al.  Transonic time-response analysis of three D.O.F. conventional and supercritical airfoils , 1982 .

[11]  Francis D Sevart,et al.  Development of Active Flutter Suppression Wind Tunnel Testing Technology , 1975 .

[12]  J. W. Edwards,et al.  Applications of Laplace transform methods to airfoil motion and stability calculations , 1979 .

[13]  E. Nissim,et al.  Active Controls for Flutter Suppression and Gust Alleviation in Supersonic Aircraft , 1980 .

[14]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  An Elementary Explanation of the Flutter Mechanism with Active Feedback Controls , 1979 .

[15]  T. Y. Yang,et al.  Transonic time responses of the MBB A-3 supercritical airfoil including active controls , 1985 .