Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design

Of all geometric shapes, a tri-oval one may be the strongest because of its capacity to bear large loads with neither rotation nor deformation. Here, we modified the external shape of a dental implant from circular to tri-oval, aiming to create a combination of high strain and low strain peri-implant environment that would ensure both primary implant stability and rapid osseointegration, respectively. Using in vivo mouse models, we tested the effects of this geometric alteration on implant survival and osseointegration over time. The maxima regions of tri-oval implants provided superior primary stability without increasing insertion torque. The minima regions of tri-oval implants presented low compressive strain and significantly less osteocyte apoptosis, which led to minimal bone resorption compared to the round implants. The rate of new bone accrual was also faster around the tri-oval implants. We further subjected both round and tri-oval implants to occlusal loading immediately after placement. In contrast to the round implants that exhibited a significant dip in stability that eventually led to their failure, the tri-oval implants maintained their stability throughout the osseointegration period. Collectively, these multiscale biomechanical analyses demonstrated the superior in vivo performance of the tri-oval implant design.

[1]  J Lindström,et al.  Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. , 1969, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  P. Branemark,et al.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Supplementum.

[3]  S. Cook,et al.  Tissue response to porous-coated implants lacking initial bone apposition. , 1988, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  L Sennerby,et al.  Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  L Sennerby,et al.  A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. , 1999, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[6]  L Sennerby,et al.  Stability measurements of one-stage Brånemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. , 1999, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[7]  N. Fujii,et al.  Tissue response to titanium implants in the rat maxilla: ultrastructural and histochemical observations of the bone-titanium interface. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[8]  Niklaus P Lang,et al.  De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  J. A. Currey,et al.  Effect of mechanical stimuli on skeletal regeneration around implants. , 2007, Bone.

[10]  J. West,et al.  Identification of stability changes for immediately placed dental implants. , 2007, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  L. Schropp,et al.  Timing of implant placement relative to tooth extraction. , 2008, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[12]  R. Strocchi,et al.  Is insertion torque correlated to bone-implant contact percentage in the early healing period? A histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of 17 human-retrieved dental implants. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[13]  Yimin Zhao,et al.  Is the osseointegration of immediately and delayed loaded implants the same?--comparison of the implant stability during a 3-month healing period in a prospective study. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  J S Hodges,et al.  Elastic properties and apparent density of human edentulous maxilla and mandible. , 2009, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[15]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro–computed tomography , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  H. Van Oosterwyck,et al.  Use of micro-CT-based finite element analysis to accurately quantify peri-implant bone strains: a validation in rat tibiae , 2012, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[17]  R. Barewal,et al.  A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the effects of three loading protocols on dental implant stability. , 2012, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  J. A. Currey,et al.  Micromotion-induced strain fields influence early stages of repair at bone-implant interfaces. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[19]  E. Valstar,et al.  Fracture risk and initial fixation of a cementless glenoid implant: The effect of numbers and types of screws , 2013, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[20]  R. Spilker,et al.  Primary cilia act as mechanosensors during bone healing around an implant. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[21]  P. Hujoel,et al.  Survival rates and bone level changes around porous oxide-coated implants (TiUnite™). , 2013, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[22]  J. Helms,et al.  A pre-clinical murine model of oral implant osseointegration. , 2014, Bone.

[23]  J. Helms,et al.  Multiscale Analyses of the Bone-implant Interface , 2015, Journal of dental research.

[24]  J. Helms,et al.  Wnt Signaling and Its Contribution to Craniofacial Tissue Homeostasis , 2015, Journal of dental research.

[25]  J. Helms,et al.  Rescuing failed oral implants via Wnt activation. , 2016, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[26]  J. Helms,et al.  Contribution of the PDL to Osteotomy Repair and Implant Osseointegration , 2017, Journal of dental research.

[27]  J. Duyck,et al.  Phosphorylated Pullulan Coating Enhances Titanium Implant Osseointegration in a Pig Model. , 2017, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[28]  K. Dirscherl,et al.  Pectin nanocoating of titanium implant surfaces ‐ an experimental study in rabbits , 2017, Clinical oral implants research.

[29]  J. Helms,et al.  Effects of Condensation on Peri-implant Bone Density and Remodeling , 2017, Journal of dental research.

[30]  J. Duyck,et al.  Titanium implant functionalization with phosphate‐containing polymers may favour in vivo osseointegration , 2017, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[31]  H. De Bruyn,et al.  Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. , 2017, Periodontology 2000.

[32]  J. Helms,et al.  Relationships among Bone Quality, Implant Osseointegration, and Wnt Signaling , 2017, Journal of dental research.

[33]  J. Helms,et al.  Biomechanics of Immediate Postextraction Implant Osseointegration , 2018, Journal of dental research.

[34]  G. Risitano,et al.  FEM Investigation of the Stress Distribution over Mandibular Bone Due to Screwed Overdenture Positioned on Dental Implants , 2018, Materials.

[35]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Long-term clinical outcome of implants with different surface modifications. , 2018, European journal of oral implantology.

[36]  G. Perinetti,et al.  Correlation between Insertion Torque and Implant Stability Quotient in Tapered Implants with Knife-Edge Thread Design , 2018, BioMed research international.