Using Stylistic Properties of Ad Pictures to Communicate with Consumers

Many researchers claim that pictures can impart descriptive concepts through their choice of stylistic properties, such as the orientation of depicted objects or the camera angle used. Yet little empirical research has explored if this is so, how readily or when such concepts are discerned, and/or whether these concepts can affect viewers' perceptions. In two studies we show that stylistic properties of ad pictures can communicate descriptive concepts that affect perceptions. However, this appears to occur only when viewers engage in ample processing of the ad and the accessibility of an appropriate descriptive concept is heightened, independent of the stylistic property. (c) 2005 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..

[1]  Paul Messaris,et al.  Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising , 1996 .

[2]  Richard Staelin,et al.  The Information Processing of Pictures in Print Advertisements , 1983 .

[3]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Evaluating persuasion-enhancing techniques from a resource-matching perspective , 1997 .

[4]  R. Batra,et al.  When the Mind Blinks: Attentional Limitations to the Perception of Sequential Visual Images: Jane E. Raymond , 2003 .

[5]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Visual and Verbal Rhetorical Figures Under Directed Processing Versus Incidental Exposure to Advertising , 2003 .

[6]  E. Hatcher.  Visual Metaphors: A Methodological Study in Visual Communication , 1989 .

[7]  S. Kreitler,et al.  Psychology of the arts , 1974 .

[8]  Gita Venkataramani Johar,et al.  Consumer Involvement and Deception from Implied Advertising Claims , 1995 .

[9]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[10]  D. Stapel,et al.  The effects of diffuse and distinct affect. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  S. Kreitler,et al.  Psychology of the arts , 1974 .

[12]  Manfredo Massironi,et al.  The psychology of graphic images , 2001 .

[13]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? , 2000 .

[14]  Laura A. Peracchio,et al.  Getting an angle in advertising: The effect of camera angle on product evaluations. , 1992 .

[15]  Rudolf Arnheim,et al.  The Power Of The Center , 1982 .

[16]  David H. Silvera,et al.  Judgment by Quantity , 1994 .

[17]  Donis A. Dondis.  A primer of visual literacy , 1973 .

[18]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  Affect Monitoring and the Primacy of Feelings in Judgment , 2001 .

[19]  Christie L. Nordhielm.  The Influence of Level of Processing on Advertising Repetition Effects , 2002 .

[20]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[21]  Roy Paul Nelson.  The design of advertising , 1981 .

[22]  R. Kraft,et al.  The influence of camera angle on comprehension and retention of pictorial events , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Linda M. Scott,et al.  Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric , 1994 .

[24]  Manfredo Massironi,et al.  The Psychology of Graphic Images: Seeing, Drawing, Communicating , 2001 .

[25]  Arthur J. Kover.  Copywriters' Implicit Theories of Communication: An Exploration , 1995 .

[26]  Laura A. Peracchio,et al.  How Ambiguous Cropped Objects in Ad Photos Can Affect Product Evaluations , 1994 .

[27]  Joshua Meyrowitz,et al.  Multiple Media Literacies , 1998 .

[28]  R. Batra,et al.  Visual Persuasion : Mental Imagery Processing and Emotional Experiences , 2003 .